Staredit Network

For all we knew, you would have said yes to keep us on our toes .

I agree it's not the most thought-out experiment, but rigging the polls is good for you and you'll know for a fact how the system works. I doesn't seem like DEAD even cares much for his loss of position.


Ok, 'wigger', start typing properly or you get warned/banned. I think that purposely typing idiotically is in the rulebook. Even if its not, when admins get annoyed, you get banned.


Wise words .

False dichotomy. There's an option C: You still think he's a worthless human being.

When's the last time you saw him make a fun map? Or an interesting post? He lives to be DEAD weight AHKEKEKEKE

Who cares... let him stay =) Wasting other peoples time has never been a crime. <<Rhymes, so it must be true.

You arn't proving me wrong you are only proving him wrong, i merely edited one word from his sentence.

And that isn't true i do still respect you.

"how is day justified?"
It's justified by improving SEN without harming SEN. If it does harm SEN, then please explain how.
[edit]Besides the poll-rigging of course. But that's beside the point of whether or not double-accounting is inherantly 'bad'.[/edit]

On the other hand, should we be banning you for speknig lek tis cuz si hadr 2 reede?
If you say no, you can be quiet now, please.
There is a rule about intelligable posts.

He does a bit. But I think that if Moose hired him _ a radical, to moderate forums, why did Moose demote him now?

Because it shows that the administration is not cracking down on multiple accounts. In this instance, he gave his reasons why he did it and he was fired/suspended. Why does it bother you so much?

If the rule being broken can be considered an experiment due to lack of response by higher-ups, then yes. But if you were to spam like hell and claim you were experimenting to see how the Mods would react, then you're stupid completely out of line; everyone knows how the Mods react to spam.

In this case, people have always been claiming that the Admins catch multiple accounts, but nothing has ever shown that. We rarely hear of people being caught - we only hear of people turning themselves in. And now we can see why, thanks to DTBK catching DEAD.

I was talking about the purposely terrible grammar.

Ah I know, I just quoted you because you had the last corrected response.

And I'm glad I'm still respected by someone.

As for the intelligible post rule, it should be enforced all over this website.

There is a rule for intelligable posts, but there is also a rule about multi accounting.

A rule is a rule, no matter what the excuse if you break it then you should go punished. Just because DEAD had a 'valid' excuse doesn't mean he should get half his suspension reduced.

He was still suspended, though - despite the length. He did also lose his staff position. That's a pretty big punishment to me. Remember the whole OSMap/LegacyWeapon thing? Its just like that.

DEAD's a respected member and a former staff member. I think that removing his position is crueler then a temporary suspension. A pointless suspension.

@Devlin - I still respect you .

I can't believe you would even feel wronged by that XD You'll probably be in ADDITION to the ten random members The policy is about pursuing 'justice', not following obscure guidelines to the letter.

Oh, now you understood that he had a valid excuse. We're gettin' progress.

"A rule is a rule" is quite stupid. Why? Because all the rules are broken ALL THE TIME (even multiple times in this discussion, besides that guy talking 1n 1n73Rn3T 1nGl1$h). I can't imagine SEN if all the rules were followed "by the book". Can you? Please share if you do.

Gee. Thanks for completely ignoring my other post.
Allow me to link:
http://www.staredit.net/index.php?showtopic=36005&st=40#


So, because I used a second account to post when I was unable to access my main one, despite having cleared it up with the staff, and never having exploited it to do anything that cannot be done with a single account, I should be punished?

http://www.staredit.net/index.php?showtopic=36016&hl=#
OMG TEH SPAMZOR BANBANBAN

*DevliN patiently waits for a reason as to why this isn't considered spam.

Thanks, Centreri. You're a pretty cool dude, too.

Yes he lost his moderation, but that isn't that big a punishment, a 16 day suspension is more of a punishment. What does he learn from 8 days?

His loss of power is permanent. A suspension is temporary. You are an idiot stupid person.

ROFL RESPECTED BY WHO? What has he ever done?

Created at least 2 CTF maps, GTA classic, widely regarded as the best GTA map of them all, and other maps. He loves SEN, has proper grammar, and was an exemplary moderator. You'll find that's more then you did or what the majority of all active members on SEN and half of the staff members on SEN did.

You cleared it up with the staff, obviously you shouldn't be banned if they are aware.

What does he learn from 16 days? Two weeks away from SEN will ironically prompt him to make another account to check up (if he really cares that much).

And actually, what does he have to learn from anyway? Not to waste time making more than one account?

ADDITION:


I'm sure in time moose will re-hire him as a moderator.

Pointless? So you're F0R breaking rules?



Isn't that considered a flame, regardless that you struck it through? Anyways, why are you justifying the fact that it's okay to break rules with an excuse that it was an experiment? What if an old banned member came back under a different psudonym and did good instead of bad? They'd still be banned regardless because they "double accounted" even if they were being productive that time around.

How can you justify breaking the rules?