Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2005-02-19 at 18:15:20
Map I made. It isn't steallar but I think it does. Interesting thing is that the starting minerals are small amounts and if you want to do much you have to venture out and control the resources in the middle of the map. You can be a turtle and stay in your easily-defendable starting spot but you'll run out of resources fast.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Yenku on 2005-02-19 at 18:45:34
interesting, ive never seen a map like this. its pretty cool, but a tad unbalanced. I like it tho its unique. Good job on this map, i may play it sometime.
7/10
ADDITION:
lol, you think it does what? any way good job again, is this your first melee map?
7/10
ADDITION:
QUOTE(DT_Battlekruser @ Feb 19 2005, 06:15 PM)
Map I made. It isn't steallar but I think it does. Interesting thing is that the starting minerals are small amounts and if you want to do much you have to venture out and control the resources in the middle of the map. You can be a turtle and stay in your easily-defendable starting spot but you'll run out of resources fast.
[right][snapback]149047[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]149047[/snapback][/right]
lol, you think it does what? any way good job again, is this your first melee map?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by BeeR_KeG on 2005-02-19 at 19:19:09
I'm going to rate your map just like any melee mapper.
Your map is slightly unbalanced and has few strategies for the following reasons.
- It is slightly unbalanced because the bottom players have less starting space.
- There are no doodads which means there is no cover or strategic importnt areas.
- The bottom middle expansion has a much smaller chokepoint than the one at top
- There really isn't much to fight over in the middle, only a big mineral base and thats it. Everything else is worthless to fight over.
Your map is slightly unbalanced and has few strategies for the following reasons.
- It is slightly unbalanced because the bottom players have less starting space.
- There are no doodads which means there is no cover or strategic importnt areas.
- The bottom middle expansion has a much smaller chokepoint than the one at top
- There really isn't much to fight over in the middle, only a big mineral base and thats it. Everything else is worthless to fight over.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2005-02-20 at 01:23:38
1. grr that is a problem
2. yes, yes
3. but the top has more a curvature that makes better defense from atop the cliff. It's a tradeoff.
4. the middle reprsents really the only truly sizeable amount of resources on the map
2. yes, yes
3. but the top has more a curvature that makes better defense from atop the cliff. It's a tradeoff.
4. the middle reprsents really the only truly sizeable amount of resources on the map
Report, edit, etc...Posted by phlemhacker99 on 2005-02-20 at 01:31:38
it sorta reminds me of a map i made a while ago that was supposed to force you to expand. It didn't turn out so well.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Yenku on 2005-02-20 at 10:10:55
Battlekruser dont get me wrong its a good map, you have to try spending more time balancing it, and maybe make mor ehills and stuff, it adds a lot of strategy.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Puni(F) on 2005-02-20 at 10:13:31
I like the map...Only thing I don't like about it is that it's 2v2 
And the bottom is riggy....Ill rate it a 6/10.
And the bottom is riggy....Ill rate it a 6/10.