Report, edit, etc...Posted by Death-Link on 2005-03-28 at 03:48:37
whenever i play a 3v3 its mostly "no 3v1" which i think is really stupid. blizzard didnt make 6 and 8 player maps and said "ok play on these maps, but no 3v1". it just ruins the game, because you dont have enough freedom to use your units in the best way possible. the 3v3 game is supposed to have 3v1 encounters, or else you cant call it a 3v3. it requires all the players to be on full alert and know where their opponents are at all times, so they can either send their troops for help or build some defences so they wont get owned.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by arglebosters on 2005-03-28 at 09:14:21
Ya. I don't like No Rush XX minutes becasue I am mostly about rushing, or at least a fast tank rush or something. No Rush 20 minutes is way too much time to just biuld up a force and static defence.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by BeeR_KeG on 2005-03-28 at 09:23:58
No Rules, just like the game is supposed to be.
Sometimes I enter No Rush 20 minutes games and I rush them all.
No 3v1 is just plain stupid, if 3 people are attacking you it's because they wanted you dead. Your allies should've attacked the enemy bases of the plaeyrs attacking you so that they move their units elsewhere from your base.
Rules are put that noobs that can't cope with the game. No Rush 20 minutes just makes everyone build 24 carriers and 200 photon cannons to kill everything within sight.
No 3v1 is just plain stupid, noobs don't want to get overwhelmed by all the opponents at the same time. It's also pretty dumb by the opponents part to use so many units on one player. 2v1 is fine but 3v1 is just a waste of resources.
Sometimes I enter No Rush 20 minutes games and I rush them all.
No 3v1 is just plain stupid, if 3 people are attacking you it's because they wanted you dead. Your allies should've attacked the enemy bases of the plaeyrs attacking you so that they move their units elsewhere from your base.
Rules are put that noobs that can't cope with the game. No Rush 20 minutes just makes everyone build 24 carriers and 200 photon cannons to kill everything within sight.
No 3v1 is just plain stupid, noobs don't want to get overwhelmed by all the opponents at the same time. It's also pretty dumb by the opponents part to use so many units on one player. 2v1 is fine but 3v1 is just a waste of resources.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by KaboomHahahein on 2005-03-28 at 09:42:54
Yeah no rush games are pretty stupid. I always rush on them and piss them off. Then they call me a noob. I once played a no rush 20 minutes with "no magic allowed" that was one of the lamest games. You were only allowed to use brute force to win.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-03-28 at 11:21:53
If you're playing a 3v3, you're asking to get attacked by 2 or 3 sides... Technically, someone should always stay behind and back the others.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by wesmic da pimp on 2005-03-28 at 11:37:03
No magic allowed??? 
LOL!!!!! thats probably the gayest thing i have ever seen/heard
LOL!!!!! thats probably the gayest thing i have ever seen/heardReport, edit, etc...Posted by BeeR_KeG on 2005-03-28 at 11:41:55
Not for me it isn't.
I once saw a game 3v3 NR20 No air
I just laughed, your gonna spend 20 minutes building hydras/tanks/liaths/goons/DT?
Thats just plain stupid.
I once saw a game 3v3 NR20 No air
I just laughed, your gonna spend 20 minutes building hydras/tanks/liaths/goons/DT?
Thats just plain stupid.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by wesmic da pimp on 2005-03-28 at 11:56:09
seriously and money maps just piss me off... i wanna find out whoever made the first fastest pussible map and i wanna Power Ranger Pimp Slap him...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by warhammer40000 on 2005-03-28 at 12:27:23
Havnt played 3v3 in awhile but its with no rules! You could say no rush. But thats more of a 1v1 thing.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Death-Link on 2005-03-29 at 03:13:03
i wanna find the guy who first started the "no 3v1" and bash him up 
