Report, edit, etc...Posted by pekkel_the_duck on 2005-05-29 at 07:12:11
[attachmentid=9558]
This is Ver. 1
[attachmentid=9557]
Ver. 2
Now, I'm kinda leaning towards Ver. 2. Tell me what I can do to improve these maps if you can, or if they're complete crud, tell me that, too.
This is Ver. 1
[attachmentid=9557]
Ver. 2
Now, I'm kinda leaning towards Ver. 2. Tell me what I can do to improve these maps if you can, or if they're complete crud, tell me that, too.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by wesmic da pimp on 2005-05-29 at 13:06:41
I would probably prefer V2.
Can a nexus fit in that middle P?
Can a nexus fit in that middle P?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Panschk on 2005-05-30 at 07:29:27
v1 is 3 player map right? Looks strange, I would expact 3 player maps to have the distance between each position in constant length. I'd prefer v2, but there are still some issues:
1) Mains are too small, esp. purple
2) the minerals in the main are placed too close to the choke
3) While it might sound like a cool Idea, minerals to block parts of the map
up pathfinding.
4) The fact that there is no gas at the natural will not make zerg very happy, but I don't like 'em anyway:D
1) Mains are too small, esp. purple
2) the minerals in the main are placed too close to the choke
3) While it might sound like a cool Idea, minerals to block parts of the map
up pathfinding. 4) The fact that there is no gas at the natural will not make zerg very happy, but I don't like 'em anyway:D
Report, edit, etc...Posted by warhammer40000 on 2005-05-30 at 11:17:04
Version one feels a bit more natural, with the terrain being a bit more... realistic-ish.... But version 2 looks cool, but is less natural looking.
hmmm... myabe V1, but this is a hard decision. It seems V2 is just another RM, while v1 is newer and original.er.
PS-
top left of V1 is just plain cool.
hmmm... myabe V1, but this is a hard decision. It seems V2 is just another RM, while v1 is newer and original.er.
PS-
top left of V1 is just plain cool.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by wesmic da pimp on 2005-05-30 at 14:17:01
Mabye if you made V.1 a 2 player map, then it would be a whole lot better, plus it's original.
BTW: Doesn't this belong in Showcase & In Production?
BTW: Doesn't this belong in Showcase & In Production?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-05-30 at 22:46:20
remove that huge "P" from the center 
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Hofodomo on 2005-05-31 at 10:35:02
Well, keep version one just because it's a 3-player map. Version 2's pretty cool though -- looks nice.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by pekkel_the_duck on 2005-05-31 at 18:30:56
I'll alter them and present the finished versions later. Thnx for the input all.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by wesmic da pimp on 2005-06-01 at 11:29:46
i think you should take the bottom right player out of the 3 player map and make it two player
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Yenku on 2005-06-01 at 14:47:19
Version 2 is much better, for a 3 player map v1 is extemely unbalanced.
I would keep V2 although i would take out the P.
I would keep V2 although i would take out the P.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by u_dunu_who_me_is on 2005-06-05 at 20:39:51
I like v2, but I don't like the 'P' of minerlas in the middle. Maybe you could add like a small base area, or hirg dirt or something more constructive. But i like the v2 better, I like the bases on the sides.
*My 50th post! Yay I have 3 bars! w00t!
*My 50th post! Yay I have 3 bars! w00t!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by ManateeQuest on 2005-06-22 at 00:42:27
Your second map is much more balanced. Do you have these maps to dl? You could get people to test them (or test them yourself ) to see how long it takes to get from area to area, ect. stuff like that.
) to see how long it takes to get from area to area, ect. stuff like that.Report, edit, etc...Posted by Oo.ZeALoT.oO on 2005-06-22 at 01:10:46
Ver 2 because ver 1 looks like a 4 player map 1 player tooken away.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Rhiom on 2005-06-28 at 19:44:30
version 2, but it looks like there might be some balance issues