Report, edit, etc...Posted by chuiu on 2005-06-29 at 12:53:58
I think he means on the boards. I dont think there is a way.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Jordan on 2005-06-29 at 13:15:59
on boards you have to look all through your Style Sheets
Report, edit, etc...Posted by O)FaRTy1billion on 2005-06-29 at 13:19:45
who needs so much CSS for that? <body link="#color" alink="#color" vlink="#color"> but I dun't know hover.
(Use the CSS one if you are already using a bunch of CSS...)
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Jordan on 2005-06-29 at 13:22:49
www.htmlgoodies.com
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tarh on 2005-06-29 at 13:56:11
QUOTE
who needs so much CSS for that?
When newer, more strict versions of XHTML come out, you will begin to see less and less of the <font> tag, and other art methods done without CSS. In fact, the W3C is already beginning to recommend that web developers remove <font> tags from their code, including color=, link=, vlink=, bgcolor=, and other art attributes.
Those who wish to comply with the W3C will need to cut back on using HTML to control the look of their website. Besides, CSS is much more powerful and versitile anyway.
CSS was designed for modifying the look of your website. HTML, when it was created, was designed for controlling the layout and structure of a website, the <table> and related tags are a perfect illustration of that.
Why deny HTML it's heritage? Let it control your structure. CSS can make that structure look better than HTML was every designed to do.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by 1337(U) on 2005-06-29 at 14:02:48
HTML is not enabled on SEN, So therefor you can't use HTML to color your text.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by O)FaRTy1billion on 2005-06-29 at 14:06:01
I was talking about the <body> tags, not the <font> tags
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tarh on 2005-06-29 at 22:22:49
QUOTE
I was talking about the <body> tags, not the <font> tags
QUOTE
remove <font> tags from their code, including color=, link=, vlink=, bgcolor=
Report, edit, etc...Posted by warhammer40000 on 2005-06-30 at 18:38:52
QUOTE(O)FaRTy1billion @ Jun 29 2005, 01:19 PM)
who needs so much CSS for that? <body link="#color" alink="#color" vlink="#color"> but I dun't know hover.
(Use the CSS one if you are already using a bunch of CSS...) [right][snapback]248018[/snapback][/right]
Doesnt he mean each link a diferent color?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Forsaken on 2005-06-30 at 22:14:10
Well, take a look at Farty's sig. All I want my siggy to look like is:
[Love & Hate]
Report, edit, etc...Posted by warhammer40000 on 2005-07-01 at 11:55:07
There Has to be an Underline on a link. Here's a try from me.
[url=staredit.net][b][[color=red][u] [color=red]Love & Hate [/color][/u][/color]][/b][/url]
Translated to HTML it would be
CODE
<a href="http://www.staredit.net/"><b><font color="white">[</font><font color="red"><u><font color="red">Love & Hate </font></u></font><font color="white">]</font></b></a>
Hope that helps a bit.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tarh on 2005-07-02 at 11:29:13
I'm slightly confused . . . is this for your signature or is this for a website where you have full HTML access?
If it's for your signature, the previous post is the best that you can do. But if you want the red suggested in the previous post to be slightly darker like the sample that you posted, use "#CC0000" instead of "red" for the color value.
If it IS for a website where you have full HTML access, you can comply to standards AND remove the underline by using CSS like this: