Report, edit, etc...Posted by Demantrix on 2004-04-02 at 15:54:32
NO!!! westwood was so good at rts (not as good as blizzard
)What were they smoking?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tazzy on 2004-04-02 at 15:58:04
Its an awesome game, But ti depends on the user who playes it.
You like,
Or
You hate
Nuff said
You like,
Or
You hate
Nuff said
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Demantrix on 2004-04-02 at 16:00:57
yeah, i geuss, but the C&C's like Tiberium Sun And the AWESOME red alert and generals (almost as good as starcraft) were the perfect rts for westwood, they should have stuck too it.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by ent on 2004-04-03 at 02:24:17
um didnt the make renegade long before generals? anyway i think its a cool game but nothing i would buy
Report, edit, etc...Posted by dashrike on 2004-04-05 at 09:04:33
QUOTE(Demantrix @ Apr 2 2004, 03:00 PM)
yeah, i geuss, but the C&C's like Tiberium Sun And the AWESOME red alert and generals (almost as good as starcraft) were the perfect rts for westwood, they should have stuck too it.
C&C Tiberian Dawn was the best of them all!!!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Dark Templar on 2004-04-05 at 11:25:38
Westwood was very good at RTS, the thing about comparing SC to C&C is like apples and oranges. C&C is way more technical, terrain and stuff can effect the battle a lot, and unlike in SC where terrain effects very little and does not require not as much strategy as C&C.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Rayne on 2004-04-05 at 12:11:11
Yea thats agreeable... with C&C most of it is... who has the biggest army... or who has the most nuclear weapons/chemical weapons/ion cannon capabilities (depending on the version you play)
Report, edit, etc...Posted by dashrike on 2004-04-05 at 13:08:36
There's a lot more strategies like hiding your true potential in C&C. If you can make your oppponent think you have less than you do, you've won. The same is generally true in sc, but not to the same extent.