Report, edit, etc...Posted by SiLeNT(U) on 2005-08-15 at 00:53:14
I recently read this article about the future of human evolution.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7103668/
After you read it, give your opinions on it.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7103668/
After you read it, give your opinions on it.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Ninebreaker on 2005-08-15 at 01:00:23
Ya, um, i don't think i'll read all 6 pages of it 
But from the first page, sooner or later, we will be able to create our own non-natural-birthed humans, but the majority will be against it.
But from the first page, sooner or later, we will be able to create our own non-natural-birthed humans, but the majority will be against it.Report, edit, etc...Posted by warhammer40000 on 2005-08-15 at 01:04:09
Yea, i know, our evolution will be cyborgs, or just robots... (Or maybe cyborgs, THEN robots)
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Doodan on 2005-08-15 at 01:28:40
In the future, the hip-hop culture will so badly saturate everything else, that even old grannies break dance and say "wut up homies!?"
Report, edit, etc...Posted by warhammer40000 on 2005-08-15 at 01:35:51
Sadly true... 
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Rantent on 2005-08-15 at 02:06:50
Well, one thing has changed in the perspective of American culture.
Evolution is normally based upon what functions help an animal survive. The life forms who survive better get more babies, or are simply not killed off as much. Humans do not follow these rules. We have emerged above the system by being able to provide enough resources to everyone. (Although some people still don't have the opportunities.) The people who would now have better physical capabilities get shunned out of society. (Having six fingers instead of five is actually a dominant gene, yet you never see it on anyone.) Now the direction of evolution would be towards the mainstream of pop culture. People of the future will probably be less diverse than they are today. And from an evolutionary standpoint, less diversity = Extinction.
Evolution is normally based upon what functions help an animal survive. The life forms who survive better get more babies, or are simply not killed off as much. Humans do not follow these rules. We have emerged above the system by being able to provide enough resources to everyone. (Although some people still don't have the opportunities.) The people who would now have better physical capabilities get shunned out of society. (Having six fingers instead of five is actually a dominant gene, yet you never see it on anyone.) Now the direction of evolution would be towards the mainstream of pop culture. People of the future will probably be less diverse than they are today. And from an evolutionary standpoint, less diversity = Extinction.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by IceWarrior98 on 2005-08-15 at 20:29:42
I wish I would be alive in 2 million years, be radiation resistant, red skin and wutnot haha kewl. But still this is complete BS there is no possibly way for us to even guess what we may look like in the future as we evolve because there are so many possibilities even if we live to the next evolution state.