Staredit Network

I'll leave it open for discusion, no one better vote the last option.

StarCraft is the most deserving of a sequel, an RTS, not an FPS. As much as I'd like that, it's most likely going to be StarCraft: Ghost followed by Diablo III.

I'd like Warcraft III if they made a couple changes. Take the HEROES OUT. This way people don't go DK, DH, BM or AM all the time. I really love how they made each race unique and the way the economy isn't a focus of all your micro.

So I like how Warcraft handles economy and the way each unit has lots of functions. However, I like the graphics of SC, even though it isn't as advanced, it lags less.

What I really want is a collaboration of both worlds. So SC2 would have WC3s economy, and units would have a lot more function. In SC I don't see many units used like firebats, scouts or valkyries. Or I could simply say, make it similar to WC3, but take out the heroes.

Starcraft 2 > Starcraft Ghost > Diablo III > Warcraft

I do believe a StarCraft 2 Is needed... Although they might as well finish SC ghost because its over half way done...

[center]They need to finish SC: Ghost, then start on SC II.[/center]

Agreed. StarCraft's plot is, in my opinion, the most deserving of a continuation... There's too many unanswered questions. And the game rocks as well.

I think they shouldn't make SC II an RTS.
Bettter make it FPS, TPS so that fans arent like "sc is bad, sc is better!"
If they need a SC-RTS, make an expansion. Well a huge exp. Engine update

Off Topic: wtf is FPS? Just wondering cause i watched this video at Putfile.com and it was about this guy who just plays FPS then he loses and he gets all pissed off

On Topic: Starcraft Ghosts Can rot in hell its only coming out for some of the Consoles Not even a PC Version. GO STARCRAFT 2!!! and does anyone know if starcraft 2 is gonna connect to battle.net?

First person shooter

They haven't started maknig it yet.

I fear the worst, SC2 is going to be 3D cartoony and not violent and gorey liek the current SC is, it's eneviable. Unless we send a lot lot lot lot mails saying "CARTOONS SUCK"
What would be really cool to see but never be made is World of Starcraft ;o. Think of taking a tank over the zerg territory running over zergs as BCs give a giant shadow over the battlefield as the zerg crap their pants when they see the Yamto Gun comming

I always thought they could make a great MMOFPS out of Starcraft. Think about it, you start as a Zergling, Marine, or Zealot, and you can just go on random missions for tanks of vespine or something, or team up with a squad and head to the frontlines. As you rank-up (the equivilant of leveling-up, but much harder), you can pick a differenent unit, like a Dragoon, Hydralisk, or Vulture. Not all the way up to Battlecruisers, though. Maybe you could gun for them, and a Gamemaster pilots it. For a Carrier, you could be an Interceptor. I guess the biggest, baddest unit you could wholy be would be Ultralisk, but you'd be tkaing most of the enemy fire.

Terran / Protoss only imo. Zerg die too fast and have a '1-brain' hive.
Buy better weapons, get better ranks, get better equipment, armor =0

Or only if you're a lone infested human zerg something. Then you have a brain.

WHy not Zerg?
Ever played Natural Selection?
Very Terran V Zerg-ish
Works great

They could make a StarCraft MMOFPS, but StarCraft II should be an RTS.

And the 3-D graphics will not be cartoony like WarCraft III. They have much better 3-D graphics out there. I've already posted screenshots so you must be blind or you're ignoring them because you're so conservative you want it to be just like StarCraft. Guess what, if you want that "genuine StarCraft experience" go play StarCraft. Don't make Blizzard waste years of time to develop a game that's the exact same as the original.

The 3-D graphics will be sharp and concise. The only thing making battles hectic will be explosions, and even then you'll be able to commandeer your forces easily. A great thing about 3-D though, units won't get choked up on a spot though. And I predict the AI will get a much, much needed improvement.

And if you don't like good graphics, you suck.

Who knows, they did 3 warcraft related things in a row (Reign of Chaos, Frozen Throne, and WOW), so maybe they'll do a couple of starcraft things back to back. The Diablo fans may feel neglected, but that's not our problem.

I can dream, can't I?

Starcraft 2, Warcraft doesnt need any more installments. Diablo III will take till 2007 (apx) to start with the stuff they need so Starcraft 2 is more deserving!