Is the Null forum not strict enough? Debate.
No, it's not strict enough. There's too many topics like "OMG I CANT BELIEVE I CAN MAKE POLLS"...
No. There's too much spam. The mods need to work harder to prevent asses from flaming/spaming.
Why? If you don't like spam, just ignore it or go to the other two identical forums without spam.
We have Serious Discussion and Lite Discussion. If you want less spam, go to those.
There is no reason to turn Null into Lite Discussion. It already exists.
Ummm...I like this forum...But...I dunno if its too strict or strict enough....
It's not strict enough, and me being a retired mod, would know.
Null is null.
It's a place for near spam stuff.
That's what we made Lite Discussion for, I think it's fine.
[center]This forum's gone to hell. There's spam piling up in here, and it's started spilling over into other forums.
This really needs to be taken care of. There are a few specific people who are the main contributors.[/center]
Null is for useless topics, not massive spam. Even I cant take it.
Moose plans to fix it, I see.
QUOTE(Voyager7456(MM) @ Oct 16 2005, 07:58 AM)
No, it's not strict enough. There's too many topics like "OMG I CANT BELIEVE I CAN MAKE POLLS"...
[right][snapback]334949[/snapback][/right]
YaeXrillion?
Anywho, yes they're was too much spam for the past 2 weeks. For some reason it's starting to calm down. Maybe people are starting to get it.
It's not strict enough. Make moderation of topics more known, and dont just, say, delete them. Lock it with a thorough explanation of why it's wrong (Unless it's obvious).
Why do you guys care if there is spam here?
Why can't you ignore it, or go to Lite Discusion or Serious Discussion?
Because by habit people continually visit this section of the forum and expect something other than spam to exist here when really lite discussion has become what Null used to be.
Definatley too much spam.
QUOTE
It is NOT a forum for flaming or spam.
It is just a place where you post topics if they don't fit into any of the other ones.
It would really suck if SEN turned into those crappy forums that 90% of all the threads are spam.
I think you guys did pretty good jobs moderating but it would be nice if you were stricter.
Maybe another Mod would help?
QUOTE(chuOS @ Oct 17 2005, 08:14 AM)
Because by habit people continually visit this section of the forum and expect something other than spam to exist here when really lite discussion has become what Null used to be.
[right][snapback]335679[/snapback][/right]
Why?
This forum isn't fast enough for the spam topics to push the other ones down, so I don't understand why
not reading the threads you don't like is so much of a problem.
Because looking the other way usually isn't the best way to deal with something.
QUOTE(Absolute @ Oct 17 2005, 02:44 PM)
Why?
This forum isn't fast enough for the spam topics to push the other ones down, so I don't understand why not reading the threads you don't like is so much of a problem.
[right][snapback]335686[/snapback][/right]
You're being deliberately controversial.
Yes, there's so much spam here that it's driven me out of Null.
Yes, Lite Discussion and Serious Discussion are better.
However, Null has become the waste-bin of SEN, and Lite Discussion has not replaced the old Null/Anything Goes - it's slightly more formal than that.
QUOTE(Mini Moose 2707 @ Oct 17 2005, 08:56 AM)
Because looking the other way usually isn't the best way to deal with something.
[right][snapback]335687[/snapback][/right]
That's only if there is an actual problem. However, if the problem is derived from
the act looking (being annoyed becuase you choose to read threads) then turning the other way is actually the perfect solution.
QUOTE
You're being deliberately controversial.
What makes you say that? Because I don't want to take action on something that should be of absolutely no concern? You're being deliberately contraversial in that you want to make change for the sake of change.
QUOTE(Absolute @ Oct 17 2005, 07:49 PM)
What makes you say that? Because I don't want to take action on something that should be of absolutely no concern? You're being deliberately contraversial in that you want to make change for the sake of change.
[right][snapback]335755[/snapback][/right]
Well, not quite. I've just been monitoring your responses on a few topics and you seem to disagree with the general trend of public opinion a lot. That's being controversial.
QUOTE
Well, not quite. I've just been monitoring your responses on a few topics and you seem to disagree with the general trend of public opinion a lot. That's being controversial.
Big Brother!?
anyway... toa obviously you wouldn't find anything wrong, you just so happen to be the one who makes 1000 threads in this forum on every little thing. Maybe you just didn't realize you don't get minerals here?
But ya, I liked the old "Anything Goes" forum because really, not everything goes. I now tend to stay out of this forum because of massive
.
QUOTE(Euro @ Oct 17 2005, 08:07 PM)
Big Brother!?
[right][snapback]335764[/snapback][/right]
Oh yes. I might not be very active, but I'm always lurking and identifying classes of forumer.
Crack the whip.
QUOTE(CaptainWill @ Oct 17 2005, 01:54 PM)
Well, not quite. I've just been monitoring your responses on a few topics and you seem to disagree with the general trend of public opinion a lot. That's being controversial.
[right][snapback]335758[/snapback][/right]
Why exactly are you stalking absolute?
The only topics i really like in here are "What the heck are you listening to", "How will the person above you die" and the SEN bar.
I think there are too many pointless topics, but i belive that every forum should have its share of silly message board games.