Report, edit, etc...Posted by Zombie on 2005-10-27 at 15:42:10
I loved this game, Great graphics (not like hl2..) but it still had very good battles and good mapping design.
Played the game? talk about it here
Played the game? talk about it here
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mr.Camo on 2005-11-02 at 09:27:57
+ a bit respect for zombie
Online play is amazing, the mapping is great, the storyline is sperb. It just couldn't get better, it matches up there with bf2 for me. (I'm just better at bf2 at the moment)
Online play is amazing, the mapping is great, the storyline is sperb. It just couldn't get better, it matches up there with bf2 for me. (I'm just better at bf2 at the moment)
Report, edit, etc...Posted by KrAzY on 2005-11-02 at 11:49:33
Battlefield 2: Modern Combat and Call of Duty 2 is not that good or cool. What about Brothers in Arms and Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood, they got way better ratings and a better gameplay. In Brothers in Arms, and Earned in Blood is that you control a Sargeant and control Squads and tell them what to do other than just run up to them and kill them and die, besides isn't Brothers in Arms based on the true story?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mr.Camo on 2005-11-02 at 18:26:31
What are you smoking? I don't think you've seen the CORRECT reviews.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Revelade on 2005-11-02 at 21:48:33
QUOTE(Mr.Camo @ Nov 2 2005, 06:26 PM)
What are you smoking? I don't think you've seen the CORRECT reviews.
[right][snapback]346982[/snapback][/right]
What are YOU smoking? Reviews can't be correct, because when it comes down to it, they are basically opinions.[right][snapback]346982[/snapback][/right]
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mr.Camo on 2005-11-02 at 22:49:08
I trust professional reviews more than SC addicted teens...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Shapechanger on 2005-11-02 at 23:12:00
QUOTE
I trust professional reviews more than SC addicted teens...
Most of those reviews are written based on how much money the person reviewing the game got paid. CoD was not realistic AT ALL! Since when do you send 300 German soldiers to their death in an attempt to destroy A SINGLE TANK? And since when does a bullet from a Mouser NOT TAKE A HUGE CHUNK CLEAN OUT OF YOU? Read up on weapon firepower, WWII tactics, etc. before you say anything.
Stop flaming.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mr.Camo on 2005-11-03 at 00:39:20
Wow, I've never been hurt so much. I'm going to go cry now. You obviously haven't played CoD 2.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Shapechanger on 2005-11-03 at 08:32:54
Looking at the trailer, here. Doesn't seem to be many improvements. Russian tactics, I admit, were a bit suicidal. And I can see that in the trailer. Do the MG's still have unlimited bullets? Never overheat? Are the envriroments destructable? How many shots can you take before dying? Do you still heal from picking up random First Aid kits lyinh around?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mr.Camo on 2005-11-03 at 10:00:16
You get first aid kits and you have to apply them, MG's do, which yes I admit.. Does suck for the gameplay, but they do overheat. I think SOME enviroments are destrucable..
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Golden-Fist on 2005-11-03 at 13:59:48
QUOTE(Crayek @ Nov 3 2005, 08:32 AM)
Looking at the trailer, here. Doesn't seem to be many improvements. Russian tactics, I admit, were a bit suicidal. And I can see that in the trailer. Do the MG's still have unlimited bullets? Never overheat? Are the envriroments destructable? How many shots can you take before dying? Do you still heal from picking up random First Aid kits lyinh around?
[right][snapback]347434[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]347434[/snapback][/right]
To be fair there isn't a single game that has all of that, and if there is it's difficulties are probably labeled:
"FRIGGIN HARD"
"PULL YOUR HAIR OUT"
"AHHHHHHH WFWFWTWFWT *EXPLEODZ*"
Although you think realism is so great (I know certain people stick by what they say like Rev) but most of the time when people want realism they later complain on how the game is too hard and how they rather play a game for fun rather then get shot once and die from blood posaining 20 minutes later. I've seen it happen before.
The way you want things is that you can't get shot, ever. Which would be cool at times but they would have to have 20 people or so on screen at all times, and most of the "battles" would consist of you sitting behind cover waiting for other people to do things. Wow, thrilling...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Shapechanger on 2005-11-03 at 16:49:24
QUOTE
To be fair there isn't a single game that has all of that
Day of Defeat.
If you play on a 'realism' server, then the only thing it doesn't have is destructable enviroments. Some are partially destructable (ex. certain walls).
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Zombie on 2005-11-04 at 23:09:58
QUOTE(Cronus @ Nov 2 2005, 09:12 PM)
Most of those reviews are written based on how much money the person reviewing the game got paid. CoD was not realistic AT ALL! Since when do you send 300 German soldiers to their death in an attempt to destroy A SINGLE TANK? And since when does a bullet from a Mouser NOT TAKE A HUGE CHUNK CLEAN OUT OF YOU? Read up on weapon firepower, WWII tactics, etc. before you say anything.
Stop flaming.
[right][snapback]347323[/snapback][/right]
Stop flaming.
[right][snapback]347323[/snapback][/right]
hello earth to Cronus. cod wasnt that good but have you played UO? mmm. the rifle damage depends on where you shoot them to.
QUOTE(Cronus @ Nov 3 2005, 02:49 PM)
Day of Defeat.
If you play on a 'realism' server, then the only thing it doesn't have is destructable enviroments. Some are partially destructable (ex. certain walls).
[right][snapback]347512[/snapback][/right]
If you play on a 'realism' server, then the only thing it doesn't have is destructable enviroments. Some are partially destructable (ex. certain walls).
[right][snapback]347512[/snapback][/right]
so it isnt what you just said above? cod2 you can destroy certain walls to.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Shapechanger on 2005-11-05 at 12:16:02
God, stupidity!
Day of Defeat, there are no heals, MG's overheat realistically, MG's run out of ammo, sniper's have drift, damage done by grenades, bullets, etc. are realistic, damage dependant on which body part you hit, you have an energy bar, which depeats everytime you jump, sprint, etc.
On a realism server, they take away the death notices (ex. Joe killed John), add features like breaking your legs from falling, etc.
Day of Defeat, there are no heals, MG's overheat realistically, MG's run out of ammo, sniper's have drift, damage done by grenades, bullets, etc. are realistic, damage dependant on which body part you hit, you have an energy bar, which depeats everytime you jump, sprint, etc.
On a realism server, they take away the death notices (ex. Joe killed John), add features like breaking your legs from falling, etc.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Zombie on 2005-11-05 at 16:35:30
QUOTE(Cronus @ Nov 5 2005, 10:16 AM)
God, stupidity!
Day of Defeat, there are no heals, MG's overheat realistically, MG's run out of ammo, sniper's have drift, damage done by grenades, bullets, etc. are realistic, damage dependant on which body part you hit, you have an energy bar, which depeats everytime you jump, sprint, etc.
On a realism server, they take away the death notices (ex. Joe killed John), add features like breaking your legs from falling, etc.
[right][snapback]348703[/snapback][/right]
Day of Defeat, there are no heals, MG's overheat realistically, MG's run out of ammo, sniper's have drift, damage done by grenades, bullets, etc. are realistic, damage dependant on which body part you hit, you have an energy bar, which depeats everytime you jump, sprint, etc.
On a realism server, they take away the death notices (ex. Joe killed John), add features like breaking your legs from falling, etc.
[right][snapback]348703[/snapback][/right]
QUOTE
Day of Defeat, there are no heals,
is that online? no heals online
QUOTE
MG's overheat realistically
coduo has that to
QUOTE
MG's run out of ammo,
Coduo mgs dont run out of ammo
QUOTE
sniper's have drift,
Coduo has that
QUOTE
damage done by grenades, bullets, etc. are realistic, damage dependant on which body part you hit
Same as coduo
QUOTE
you have an energy bar
yes coduo has that
QUOTE
On a realism server, they take away the death notices (ex. Joe killed John),
Thats not really realistic. it just screws up the online play.
QUOTE
add features like breaking your legs from falling, etc.
coduo has that to. on all servers realsim or not
Does DoD have slower speeds? depending on what weapon u carry?
QUOTE
God, stupidity!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Shapechanger on 2005-11-09 at 18:35:34
QUOTE
Does DoD have slower speeds? depending on what weapon u carry?
Yes
QUOTE
Thats not really realistic. it just screws up the online play.
Since when do you kill someone in a real war and pop, right there in front of your face, are the words 'YOU KILLED A GERMAN!!'?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Zombie on 2005-11-09 at 18:51:54
QUOTE(Cronus @ Nov 9 2005, 04:35 PM)
Since when do you kill someone in a real war and pop, right there in front of your face, are the words 'YOU KILLED A GERMAN!!'?
[right][snapback]351930[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]351930[/snapback][/right]
Not the last time i checked.
Playing online is alot differnt then real life. I'm not sure about you but when i play online i like to show everyone that I killed some one.
On realism servers you can have the msg alerts turned off.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Sie_Sayoka on 2005-11-14 at 04:20:10
I just got call of duty 2 and its flipping awesome. The realistics and the maps are really good. the only 2 problems about the game is that the controls take a while to get used to. I kept on pressing X to reload and i fragged my own guys. and the other problem is the gernades dont hurt me that much. it takes like 7 gernades thrown on myself to kill me.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Zombie on 2005-11-14 at 05:04:45
QUOTE(Sie_Sayoka @ Nov 14 2005, 02:20 AM)
I just got call of duty 2 and its flipping awesome. The realistics and the maps are really good. the only 2 problems about the game is that the controls take a while to get used to. I kept on pressing X to reload and i fragged my own guys. and the other problem is the gernades dont hurt me that much. it takes like 7 gernades thrown on myself to kill me.
[right][snapback]355600[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]355600[/snapback][/right]
What difficulty?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Cnl.Fatso on 2005-11-14 at 14:58:38
I can't believe you're playing it on a candy-ass console.
Clearly, computers lead the way in performance, popularity and quality of gameplay.
[/rant]
Clearly, computers lead the way in performance, popularity and quality of gameplay.
[/rant]
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Zombie on 2005-11-14 at 15:27:03
Ya, i agree consoles suck when it comes to FPS 
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Felagund on 2005-11-14 at 21:22:30
The original Call of Duty has been, by popular choice, the best WWII shooter, and I can't wait to get it for Christmas 
. Isn't that great knowing that ol' Mum will get what you want?
. Isn't that great knowing that ol' Mum will get what you want?Report, edit, etc...Posted by PingTheCow on 2005-11-16 at 21:38:06
Computers lead the way? Then why does the 360 port of the PC version of Call of Duty 2 look better and have better particle effects? I think using analog sticks takes more skill than just pointing and clicking so it makes the FPS on consoles more skill based rather than who can hotkey and hide the best. Realism sucks in games. They are called games for a reason. Its fun to have some realism but too much and you would be sitting behind a stone wall waiting for the fire to stop or to get flanked. Also in Real Life one bullet doesnt always kill. In WW2 it was not uncommon with American soldiers especially to keep going after being shot 3 to 5 times in the stomach just due to all the adreniline and actually believing in what they were fighting for. If you wanted to make a game realistic how about in DoD they make it once you die you are kicked from the server and the game and can never play the game again because you are dead and its supposed to be realistic.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Zombie on 2005-11-19 at 01:31:38
QUOTE(PingTheCow @ Nov 16 2005, 07:38 PM)
Computers lead the way? Then why does the 360 port of the PC version of Call of Duty 2 look better and have better particle effects? I think using analog sticks takes more skill than just pointing and clicking so it makes the FPS on consoles more skill based rather than who can hotkey and hide the best. Realism sucks in games. They are called games for a reason. Its fun to have some realism but too much and you would be sitting behind a stone wall waiting for the fire to stop or to get flanked. Also in Real Life one bullet doesnt always kill. In WW2 it was not uncommon with American soldiers especially to keep going after being shot 3 to 5 times in the stomach just due to all the adreniline and actually believing in what they were fighting for. If you wanted to make a game realistic how about in DoD they make it once you die you are kicked from the server and the game and can never play the game again because you are dead and its supposed to be realistic.
[right][snapback]357642[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]357642[/snapback][/right]
Well you are not kicked but if you play it in search in destroy mod, If you die your dead intelll the next round.
I didnt say the computers lead the way did i? Computers seem more fit to play on when your playing certain games to me. it does take skill to play on the game in computer and console.
MY OPINION DOESNT :censored:ING MEAN ONE THING
Report, edit, etc...Posted by UN-Rommel on 2005-11-20 at 00:52:17
I enjoyed call of duty 2 when i tried it out on the xbox 360 at the mall. Doom3 will kick 
once it on xbox 360 though. GO ID SOFTWARE! 
once it on xbox 360 though. GO ID SOFTWARE!