Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> Lite Discussion -> Who Should be President Next?

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Lyon on 2005-11-16 at 17:34:19

in 2008 when the Election Comes, Who do You Think should be President after Bush?

Report, edit, etc...Posted by BeeR_KeG on 2005-11-16 at 18:04:47

You really didn't supply us with anything to discuss about.
Answering a question isn't discussion.

>Lite Discussion

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Sie_Sayoka on 2005-11-16 at 18:17:24

well not bush (LOL) yeah... well recently the candidates for presidents have been rather... dry. Its like choosing the lesser of two evils and in the past 2 elections we chose the greater.. stupid us.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kow on 2005-11-16 at 19:01:47

You seriously think Kerry would have been better?

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Aikanaro on 2005-11-16 at 19:06:51

QUOTE(Kow @ Nov 16 2005, 07:01 PM)

You seriously think Kerry would have been better?
[right][snapback]357489[/snapback][/right]

Its like the same Person, with different names. We only can try to figure out who is the less Morally disturbed candidate, Which is a very small difference.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kow on 2005-11-16 at 19:07:44

But Kerry can't keep a stance on anything to save his life (And it's not necessary to quote the post before you)

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2005-11-16 at 19:42:34

I don't know, I think Kerry might have been the lesser of two evils...

I don't see anyone really promising for the next election though... maybe I'll run.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Doodan on 2005-11-16 at 20:18:58

QUOTE(Aikanaro @ Nov 16 2005, 07:06 PM)

Man, Its like the same Person, with different names. We only can try to figure out who is the less Morally disturbed candidate, Which is a very small difference.
[right][snapback]357497[/snapback][/right]

I hear that Kerry and Bush are distant cousins, weird eh? I voted for Kerry last year, because ANYONE would do better than Bush. I think a dog cares more about people than he does. But yeah, Kerry wasn't the best there is. I wish that the Democrats, or a third party, would take a strong stance instead of just saying "We couldn't do worse than that guy." It's like they're using the Republican critique of the country to decide what they should do and they won't get any where if they keep thinking like that.

Oh yeah, they had BETTER NOT put Hilary Clinton up to run in 2008, unless they REALLY want to lose.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Caboose on 2005-11-16 at 20:29:12

Barack Obama, I think he would be good.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Arbitrary on 2005-11-16 at 20:52:56

QUOTE(Caboose @ Nov 16 2005, 08:29 PM)

Barack Obama, I think he would be good.
[right][snapback]357579[/snapback][/right]

Perhaps, but it's unrealistic given the American populace.

I think John McCain would do rather well as President.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by MapUnprotector on 2005-11-16 at 22:11:39

QUOTE(Kow @ Nov 16 2005, 08:01 PM)

You seriously think Kerry would have been better?
[right][snapback]357489[/snapback][/right]

Well I just see it as Democrat vs Republican.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Shapechanger on 2005-11-16 at 22:33:36

Bush is just going to get one of his lackeys to run for office, so I'm pretty sure the next Democrat is getting my vote.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by T-MaStAA on 2005-11-16 at 22:33:59

I think it should be a box of tic tacs! http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=tictacs

Report, edit, etc...Posted by notnuclearrabbit on 2005-11-17 at 09:31:44

[center]MMMEEEEEEE!!!
I don't think there should be a next president. The US governemt should just dissolve, then the country can go Anarchist.[/center]

Report, edit, etc...Posted by n2o-SiMpSoNs on 2005-11-17 at 13:47:42

QUOTE(Kow @ Nov 16 2005, 08:01 PM)

You seriously think Kerry would have been better?
[right][snapback]357489[/snapback][/right]

We will never know who would of done better but, with what Bush has done how can you think that.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Alex Lifeson on 2005-11-18 at 20:24:02

Our country (teh U.S.) is in unstable pain. Why the heck do we have these two parties anyway? They don't have good music, good food, or good women, so...wait, wrong thing?

Honestly though, it really sucks to see that our Republic is controlled by TWO forces, not ONE.

Yes, I said Republic. It really makes me want to yell "PWNZOR BLAZE" at people who say it's a Democracy.

Democracy: Publically, people hold polls and the such, and representitives follow what the people want.

Republic: People elect representitives, who then in turn make thier own, private polls of how the country/state/city should be run.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2005-11-18 at 21:19:29

QUOTE(Kow @ Nov 16 2005, 04:01 PM)

You seriously think Kerry would have been better?
[right][snapback]357489[/snapback][/right]

Yes. I can't see Kerry nominating such extremists to the Supreme Court that will go crazy overturning Roe v Wade and other decisions like that.

QUOTE(Shapechanger @ Nov 16 2005, 07:33 PM)

Bush is just going to get one of his lackeys to run for office, so I'm pretty sure the next Democrat is getting my vote.
[right][snapback]357723[/snapback][/right]

Amen. The corruption in the Republican Party is astounding.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by notnuclearrabbit on 2005-11-18 at 21:21:47

[center]How many SENers can actually vote?
If I ever were to vote, it'd be for the underdog.[/center]

Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2005-11-18 at 21:22:34

I'll be eligible to vote after the 2008 elections. Sucks

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2005-11-18 at 21:36:55

Same... I'm eligible to vote (assuming I apply for citizenship...) Jan 3rd, 2009.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by MillenniumArmy on 2005-11-18 at 21:50:05

QUOTE(DT_Battlekruser @ Nov 18 2005, 08:19 PM)

Yes. I can't see Kerry nominating such extremists to the Supreme Court that will go crazy overturning Roe v Wade and other decisions like that.
Amen. The corruption in the Republican Party is astounding.
[right][snapback]358847[/snapback][/right]

Hey, well at least John Roberts was a great nominee. No one could really debate about that.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2005-11-19 at 01:36:46

QUOTE(Voyager7456(MM) @ Nov 18 2005, 06:36 PM)

Same... I'm eligible to vote (assuming I apply for citizenship...) Jan 3rd, 2009.

[right][snapback]358858[/snapback][/right]

Oct. 24, 2009.

QUOTE

Hey, well at least John Roberts was a great nominee. No one could really debate about that.

Credible, yes. Doesn't mean I'm glad to see a really moderate Rehnquist replaced with a firey right-wing zealot.

Rehnquist was on old-school conservative, from the states rights days.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Rantent on 2005-11-22 at 02:21:14

I'm guessing the next president will be...

Bush?!?
The polls must be rigged, Oh wait! That was the first time he was elected.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-11-22 at 12:32:46

ROFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

QUOTE(Sie_Sayoka @ Nov 16 2005, 04:17 PM)

They are both evil. fark them

QUOTE(Alex Lifeson @ Nov 18 2005, 06:24 PM)

Actually, we are a Democracy.

A Democratic-Republic.

Two different things.

QUOTE(nuclearrabbit @ Nov 18 2005, 07:21 PM)

[center]How many SENers can actually vote?
If I ever were to vote, it'd be for the underdog.[/center]
[right][snapback]358851[/snapback][/right]

I can vote ^_^

If Dead runs for office, i'm voting for him

Go Dean!

Report, edit, etc...Posted by dumbducky on 2005-11-22 at 16:52:09

Its still 2005. We won't even see a candidate untill atleast mid 2007
Doesn't anyone think that its a little early to be picking their presidential candidate?

Next Page (1)