http://www.1up.com/do/feature?cId=3145154Go to that website and post comments here. Pretty strange. Makes alot of sense haha. Some of the points are a little farfetched but others are obvious. Like the symbol... whats up with that? Both spirals.
It's all true

Dreamcast 2.0? When is something like that coming out?
Whenever SEGA feels like making another stupid mistake.
Dreamcast 2.0 isn't coming out. That website just points out uncanny similarities between the two.
Man the Dreamcast pwned so hard.
Haha Xbox the new Dreamcast

That'd be so cool! It's a shame Sega was sold out to microsoft...We need PURE Sega Entertainment to teach these newbs how to make a platform!
There are alot of similarities but at the bottom they tell you a bunch of different reason and differences why X-box 360 will be better than Dreamcast. I used to play Dreamcast at my friends house, it was fun.
Sega was sold to Nintendo, not microsoft, hence the Sonic games on the Gamecube.
Dreamcast was such a good system, it only failed tp make big profit because everybody else was finishing up there new systems.
If Microsoft had the Pepsi, then it's Xbox 360 > Dreamcast 2.0 all the way.
Everything is the same for some reason, even with the bald guys. But Microsoft > Sega, except for the part when Sega has Pepsi and Xbox 360 has Mountain Dew.
it acctually seems like it xbox the new dream cast but i still think ps3 is better XD
There are a few things that make a huge difference. Like how the Xbox was good and the Sega system before hand sucked, and how Sega systems were getting worse and worse. Also the whole Online thing if a huge part, since Xbox Live is the best online besides comps. There's also Halo where as Dreamcast had no big hitter, when I think of Dreamcast I think of the controller, when I think of Xbox, I think of Halo and Call of Duty 2. Also some of those things are just stupid like the Red Swirl and the Green Circles, are they saying Dreamcast failed due to it's logo? Or how about the random bald guy thing, like it really made a difference. The headset is WAY different from that blue ball crap, and also EA approves of the Xbox (So does square, Bioware, and all the companies that Microsoft bought out) unlike the Dreamcast.
If the Ps3 was coming out first they would've tried these absurb things as well.
I'm not sure which you are defending. Dream Cast in my oppinion has no chance. 360 has had alot of work on it and the graphics are amazing. I mean i know about the bugs, bugs etc... which would probly make dreamcast win but i know 360 owns it out the window.
PS3 Has a stupid design shape...

...That's got to be the most retarded controller shape EVER.
It's explained all with one smiley ..."
" The PS3 Controller is much of a Bananna or a Boomerang. Who would eat or throw that controller?
Did they ever show the back of that thing?
Maybe they have a suprise on the other side, hopefully a whole new controller.
QUOTE
There are a few things that make a huge difference. Like how the Xbox was good and the Sega system before hand sucked, and how Sega systems were getting worse and worse. Also the whole Online thing if a huge part, since Xbox Live is the best online besides comps. There's also Halo where as Dreamcast had no big hitter, when I think of Dreamcast I think of the controller, when I think of Xbox, I think of Halo and Call of Duty 2. Also some of those things are just stupid like the Red Swirl and the Green Circles, are they saying Dreamcast failed due to it's logo? Or how about the random bald guy thing, like it really made a difference. The headset is WAY different from that blue ball crap, and also EA approves of the Xbox (So does square, Bioware, and all the companies that Microsoft bought out) unlike the Dreamcast.
If the Ps3 was coming out first they would've tried these absurb things as well.
I'm not saying anything, just this website points out a lot of similarities. On the bottom of the page they do have link to page 2 which goes over alot of the things you just said.
QUOTE(Golden-Moose @ Dec 10 2005, 03:25 PM)
There are a few things that make a huge difference. Like how the Xbox was good and the Sega system before hand sucked, and how Sega systems were getting worse and worse. Also the whole Online thing if a huge part, since Xbox Live is the best online besides comps. There's also Halo where as Dreamcast had no big hitter, when I think of Dreamcast I think of the controller, when I think of Xbox, I think of Halo and Call of Duty 2. Also some of those things are just stupid like the Red Swirl and the Green Circles, are they saying Dreamcast failed due to it's logo? Or how about the random bald guy thing, like it really made a difference. The headset is WAY different from that blue ball crap, and also EA approves of the Xbox (So does square, Bioware, and all the companies that Microsoft bought out) unlike the Dreamcast.
If the Ps3 was coming out first they would've tried these absurb things as well.
[right][snapback]376000[/snapback][/right]
We can read it
ourselves. Unless people are lazy to go to the link.
QUOTE(KrAzY @ Dec 10 2005, 10:36 PM)
We can read it ourselves. Unless people are lazy to go to the link.
[right][snapback]376240[/snapback][/right]
Hey thanks Captain Smartass, i'm so glad you posted to make yourself look cooler, that one liner was just so good I can't wait for your sitcom to come out.
I didn't copy and paste it, if you'd notice, I was making certain points more visable for people who just look at blantantly stupid things like Peter Moore and what not.
QUOTE
PS3 Has a stupid design shape...
You haven't held it, so you can't judge it. Try getting some research first before bad mouthing something:
http://home.btconnect.com/hgi/ps3/ps3-pad-details.html*Achooo*...
oh sorry... I'm allergic to drama. ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
This is about xbox and dreamcast... why is everyone bringing up PsX?
QUOTE(Golden-Moose @ Dec 10 2005, 05:25 PM)
There are a few things that make a huge difference. Like how the Xbox was good and the Sega system before hand sucked, and how Sega systems were getting worse and worse. Also the whole Online thing if a huge part, since Xbox Live is the best online besides comps. There's also Halo where as Dreamcast had no big hitter, when I think of Dreamcast I think of the controller, when I think of Xbox, I think of Halo and Call of Duty 2. Also some of those things are just stupid like the Red Swirl and the Green Circles, are they saying Dreamcast failed due to it's logo? Or how about the random bald guy thing, like it really made a difference. The headset is WAY different from that blue ball crap, and also EA approves of the Xbox (So does square, Bioware, and all the companies that Microsoft bought out) unlike the Dreamcast.
If the Ps3 was coming out first they would've tried these absurb things as well.
[right][snapback]376000[/snapback][/right]
They didn't say it failed because of logo, or because of a bald guy. THEY NEVER SAID ANY OF THE SIMILARITIES MADE A DIFFERENCE, which is what you're implying. It was not random, it was similarities they saw between the two systems. If you looked on the next page, it says why the Dreamcast failed and why the 360 succeeds. The headset and mic both served the same function, and it said EA approves of 360 unlike the Dreamcast. What are you trying to get at?
It also says Square supports the xbox but I thought it Square was all about PsX with the Final Fantasy Series. They did make short visits to Nintendo, but what games from Square are for the xbox?
Apparently a company can't support more then one console?
QUOTE(Diggidoyo @ Dec 11 2005, 05:03 AM)
It also says Square supports the xbox but I thought it Square was all about PsX with the Final Fantasy Series. They did make short visits to Nintendo, but what games from Square are for the xbox?
[right][snapback]376418[/snapback][/right]
Final Fantasy 11 is being ported to Xbox360.
QUOTE
They didn't say it failed because of logo, or because of a bald guy. THEY NEVER SAID ANY OF THE SIMILARITIES MADE A DIFFERENCE, which is what you're implying. It was not random, it was similarities they saw between the two systems. If you looked on the next page, it says why the Dreamcast failed and why the 360 succeeds. The headset and mic both served the same function, and it said EA approves of 360 unlike the Dreamcast. What are you trying to get at?
THey never say it flat out but it's what their implying. If I related how George Bush is governing to how Hitler governed does that mean that I think he is a great leader? Probably not. And of course I read the next page I even mentioned a few, hur hur hur?