Report, edit, etc...Posted by Diggidoyo on 2005-12-09 at 07:51:46
http://www.1up.com/do/feature?cId=3145154
Go to that website and post comments here. Pretty strange. Makes alot of sense haha. Some of the points are a little farfetched but others are obvious. Like the symbol... whats up with that? Both spirals.
Go to that website and post comments here. Pretty strange. Makes alot of sense haha. Some of the points are a little farfetched but others are obvious. Like the symbol... whats up with that? Both spirals.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Shapechanger on 2005-12-09 at 08:13:09
It's all true 
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Joshgt2 on 2005-12-09 at 10:23:15
Dreamcast 2.0? When is something like that coming out?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Cnl.Fatso on 2005-12-09 at 14:39:34
Whenever SEGA feels like making another stupid mistake.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Diggidoyo on 2005-12-09 at 15:22:38
Dreamcast 2.0 isn't coming out. That website just points out uncanny similarities between the two.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Caboose on 2005-12-09 at 16:15:47
Man the Dreamcast pwned so hard.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by IceWarrior98 on 2005-12-09 at 17:32:34
Haha Xbox the new Dreamcast 
That'd be so cool! It's a shame Sega was sold out to microsoft...We need PURE Sega Entertainment to teach these newbs how to make a platform!
That'd be so cool! It's a shame Sega was sold out to microsoft...We need PURE Sega Entertainment to teach these newbs how to make a platform!Report, edit, etc...Posted by KaboomHahahein on 2005-12-09 at 17:49:39
There are alot of similarities but at the bottom they tell you a bunch of different reason and differences why X-box 360 will be better than Dreamcast. I used to play Dreamcast at my friends house, it was fun.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kow on 2005-12-09 at 18:03:03
Sega was sold to Nintendo, not microsoft, hence the Sonic games on the Gamecube.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by lonely_duck on 2005-12-10 at 01:06:49
Dreamcast was such a good system, it only failed tp make big profit because everybody else was finishing up there new systems.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by KrAzY on 2005-12-10 at 01:37:44
If Microsoft had the Pepsi, then it's Xbox 360 > Dreamcast 2.0 all the way.
Everything is the same for some reason, even with the bald guys. But Microsoft > Sega, except for the part when Sega has Pepsi and Xbox 360 has Mountain Dew.
Everything is the same for some reason, even with the bald guys. But Microsoft > Sega, except for the part when Sega has Pepsi and Xbox 360 has Mountain Dew.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by nightmaremage99 on 2005-12-10 at 04:09:28
it acctually seems like it xbox the new dream cast but i still think ps3 is better XD
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Golden-Fist on 2005-12-10 at 18:25:05
There are a few things that make a huge difference. Like how the Xbox was good and the Sega system before hand sucked, and how Sega systems were getting worse and worse. Also the whole Online thing if a huge part, since Xbox Live is the best online besides comps. There's also Halo where as Dreamcast had no big hitter, when I think of Dreamcast I think of the controller, when I think of Xbox, I think of Halo and Call of Duty 2. Also some of those things are just stupid like the Red Swirl and the Green Circles, are they saying Dreamcast failed due to it's logo? Or how about the random bald guy thing, like it really made a difference. The headset is WAY different from that blue ball crap, and also EA approves of the Xbox (So does square, Bioware, and all the companies that Microsoft bought out) unlike the Dreamcast.
If the Ps3 was coming out first they would've tried these absurb things as well.
If the Ps3 was coming out first they would've tried these absurb things as well.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Snipe on 2005-12-10 at 18:54:48
I'm not sure which you are defending. Dream Cast in my oppinion has no chance. 360 has had alot of work on it and the graphics are amazing. I mean i know about the bugs, bugs etc... which would probly make dreamcast win but i know 360 owns it out the window.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-12-10 at 19:35:46
PS3 Has a stupid design shape...
...That's got to be the most retarded controller shape EVER.
It's explained all with one smiley ..."
"
...That's got to be the most retarded controller shape EVER.
It's explained all with one smiley ..."
"Report, edit, etc...Posted by KrAzY on 2005-12-10 at 20:22:57
The PS3 Controller is much of a Bananna or a Boomerang. Who would eat or throw that controller?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tmac on 2005-12-10 at 20:43:13
Did they ever show the back of that thing?
Maybe they have a suprise on the other side, hopefully a whole new controller.
Maybe they have a suprise on the other side, hopefully a whole new controller.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Diggidoyo on 2005-12-10 at 22:02:30
QUOTE
There are a few things that make a huge difference. Like how the Xbox was good and the Sega system before hand sucked, and how Sega systems were getting worse and worse. Also the whole Online thing if a huge part, since Xbox Live is the best online besides comps. There's also Halo where as Dreamcast had no big hitter, when I think of Dreamcast I think of the controller, when I think of Xbox, I think of Halo and Call of Duty 2. Also some of those things are just stupid like the Red Swirl and the Green Circles, are they saying Dreamcast failed due to it's logo? Or how about the random bald guy thing, like it really made a difference. The headset is WAY different from that blue ball crap, and also EA approves of the Xbox (So does square, Bioware, and all the companies that Microsoft bought out) unlike the Dreamcast.
If the Ps3 was coming out first they would've tried these absurb things as well.
If the Ps3 was coming out first they would've tried these absurb things as well.
I'm not saying anything, just this website points out a lot of similarities. On the bottom of the page they do have link to page 2 which goes over alot of the things you just said.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by KrAzY on 2005-12-10 at 22:36:38
QUOTE(Golden-Moose @ Dec 10 2005, 03:25 PM)
There are a few things that make a huge difference. Like how the Xbox was good and the Sega system before hand sucked, and how Sega systems were getting worse and worse. Also the whole Online thing if a huge part, since Xbox Live is the best online besides comps. There's also Halo where as Dreamcast had no big hitter, when I think of Dreamcast I think of the controller, when I think of Xbox, I think of Halo and Call of Duty 2. Also some of those things are just stupid like the Red Swirl and the Green Circles, are they saying Dreamcast failed due to it's logo? Or how about the random bald guy thing, like it really made a difference. The headset is WAY different from that blue ball crap, and also EA approves of the Xbox (So does square, Bioware, and all the companies that Microsoft bought out) unlike the Dreamcast.
If the Ps3 was coming out first they would've tried these absurb things as well.
[right][snapback]376000[/snapback][/right]
If the Ps3 was coming out first they would've tried these absurb things as well.
[right][snapback]376000[/snapback][/right]
We can read it ourselves. Unless people are lazy to go to the link.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Golden-Fist on 2005-12-10 at 23:22:46
QUOTE(KrAzY @ Dec 10 2005, 10:36 PM)
We can read it ourselves. Unless people are lazy to go to the link.
[right][snapback]376240[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]376240[/snapback][/right]
Hey thanks Captain Smartass, i'm so glad you posted to make yourself look cooler, that one liner was just so good I can't wait for your sitcom to come out.
I didn't copy and paste it, if you'd notice, I was making certain points more visable for people who just look at blantantly stupid things like Peter Moore and what not.
QUOTE
PS3 Has a stupid design shape...
You haven't held it, so you can't judge it. Try getting some research first before bad mouthing something:
http://home.btconnect.com/hgi/ps3/ps3-pad-details.html
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Diggidoyo on 2005-12-11 at 03:13:32
*Achooo*...
oh sorry... I'm allergic to drama. ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
This is about xbox and dreamcast... why is everyone bringing up PsX?
oh sorry... I'm allergic to drama. ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
This is about xbox and dreamcast... why is everyone bringing up PsX?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Ultimo on 2005-12-11 at 03:58:36
QUOTE(Golden-Moose @ Dec 10 2005, 05:25 PM)
There are a few things that make a huge difference. Like how the Xbox was good and the Sega system before hand sucked, and how Sega systems were getting worse and worse. Also the whole Online thing if a huge part, since Xbox Live is the best online besides comps. There's also Halo where as Dreamcast had no big hitter, when I think of Dreamcast I think of the controller, when I think of Xbox, I think of Halo and Call of Duty 2. Also some of those things are just stupid like the Red Swirl and the Green Circles, are they saying Dreamcast failed due to it's logo? Or how about the random bald guy thing, like it really made a difference. The headset is WAY different from that blue ball crap, and also EA approves of the Xbox (So does square, Bioware, and all the companies that Microsoft bought out) unlike the Dreamcast.
If the Ps3 was coming out first they would've tried these absurb things as well.
[right][snapback]376000[/snapback][/right]
If the Ps3 was coming out first they would've tried these absurb things as well.
[right][snapback]376000[/snapback][/right]
They didn't say it failed because of logo, or because of a bald guy. THEY NEVER SAID ANY OF THE SIMILARITIES MADE A DIFFERENCE, which is what you're implying. It was not random, it was similarities they saw between the two systems. If you looked on the next page, it says why the Dreamcast failed and why the 360 succeeds. The headset and mic both served the same function, and it said EA approves of 360 unlike the Dreamcast. What are you trying to get at?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Diggidoyo on 2005-12-11 at 05:03:26
It also says Square supports the xbox but I thought it Square was all about PsX with the Final Fantasy Series. They did make short visits to Nintendo, but what games from Square are for the xbox?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Ultimo on 2005-12-11 at 05:41:43
Apparently a company can't support more then one console?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Golden-Fist on 2005-12-11 at 08:16:52
QUOTE(Diggidoyo @ Dec 11 2005, 05:03 AM)
It also says Square supports the xbox but I thought it Square was all about PsX with the Final Fantasy Series. They did make short visits to Nintendo, but what games from Square are for the xbox?
[right][snapback]376418[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]376418[/snapback][/right]
Final Fantasy 11 is being ported to Xbox360.
QUOTE
They didn't say it failed because of logo, or because of a bald guy. THEY NEVER SAID ANY OF THE SIMILARITIES MADE A DIFFERENCE, which is what you're implying. It was not random, it was similarities they saw between the two systems. If you looked on the next page, it says why the Dreamcast failed and why the 360 succeeds. The headset and mic both served the same function, and it said EA approves of 360 unlike the Dreamcast. What are you trying to get at?
THey never say it flat out but it's what their implying. If I related how George Bush is governing to how Hitler governed does that mean that I think he is a great leader? Probably not. And of course I read the next page I even mentioned a few, hur hur hur?