Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> Games -> Quake 4
Report, edit, etc...Posted by UN-Rommel on 2005-12-23 at 17:13:14
As you all know, Quake 4 is now out for xbox 360. The graphics are amazing, the story line is great but not as good as doom3, visuals are impecable, and the gameplay is realisticly fun. This game is destined to be the number 1 hit of 2006 and will probably be the only predecesser to doom3 or even perhaps doom4 once that comes out. Go ahead and post your opinions about Quake 4 here.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by KrAzY on 2005-12-23 at 17:32:48
In GameSpot, it had to hit one of the Worst Game ever, because of "Most Aggravating Frame Rate / Best Slideshow" game. I would give it a good rating but it has a 6.6 on GameSpot.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by The_Shattered_moose on 2005-12-23 at 17:44:18
That just doesn't make sense, my computer is pretty old, and it ran perfectly with the settings cranked up 1280x1024 res, 4x antialiasing, and maxed detail on everything else.
No game reveiwer in their right mind would have a machine worse than mine, so we must make one of two assumptions.
1.) Gamespot game reviewers have suffered heavy brain damage (quite possible)
or
2.)The gamespot reviewers are running a machine that belongs in a museam.

Just for reference, I'm running a homemade system, using a nvidia 6800, 2.0 amd sempron processor, and a gig of ram, a far cry from a modern gaming machine.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Golden-Fist on 2005-12-23 at 18:11:05
QUOTE(The_Shattered_moose @ Dec 23 2005, 05:44 PM)
That just doesn't make sense, my computer is pretty old, and it ran perfectly with the settings cranked up 1280x1024 res, 4x antialiasing, and maxed detail on everything else.
No game reveiwer in their right mind would have a machine worse than mine, so we must make one of two assumptions.
1.) Gamespot game reviewers have suffered heavy brain damage (quite possible)
or
2.)The gamespot reviewers are running a machine that belongs in a museam.

Just for reference, I'm running a homemade system, using a nvidia 6800, 2.0 amd sempron processor, and a gig of ram, a far cry from a modern gaming machine.
[right][snapback]387842[/snapback][/right]

He's talking about for the 360 pointdexter. The PC version is fine, the 360 version blows.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by KrAzY on 2005-12-23 at 18:19:07
The Xbox 360 doesn't blow. angry.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Caboose on 2005-12-23 at 18:24:35
Yeah it does... 360 won't even compare to the Rev and PS3... Prolly what's MAYBE gonna save it from the Rev and PS3 is Halo 3.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Golden-Fist on 2005-12-23 at 18:52:24
QUOTE(KrAzY @ Dec 23 2005, 06:19 PM)
The Xbox 360 doesn't blow. angry.gif
[right][snapback]387874[/snapback][/right]

Are you sure it's not the Xenon?
And yeah the frame rate for quake 4 on 360, sucks.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by RJ_Fighter on 2005-12-23 at 19:59:47
Quake 4 on X360 is crap.

Now, the PC version pwns. I just got it for Christmas happy.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by UN-Rommel on 2005-12-23 at 21:12:24
I don't think that way about it. It has a tight online if it ever works due to x360 has issues. Whats the difference between the pc and x360 for single anyhow, it still has close to same graphics and it has a much easier controling system. Then again thats just my opinion but it is basically the same thing when comparing it. Also for the note, gamespot is not the only rating reviewers. Game informer gave it a 7.0 but for xbox, they gave it a 9.0. Notice how it varies toward each reviewer.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by RedNara on 2005-12-23 at 21:16:14
dude xbox 360 beats revolution you kidding.. i guess its becuase i dont like nintendo but they dont know what they doing, DS = crap i cant expect revolution to be any better, the reason is their target is at kids now... they think mario will win the game maybe when i was like 10 and i thought 100 bucks was the biggest thing in the world yea i was like omfg its a gamecube 100 bucks cheaper i should get that for sure but now 100 bucks is like jezz for that piece of crap

now between xbox 360 and ps3 that all depends on who you like more... but the winner it all can be figured out once ps3 comes out for now we cant even say it, becuase i bet they both have their ups and downs. but tell you the truth i cant really see that much of diff, at max its only slightly better overall wont make much diff..


but about quake 4 on 360 not sure but cod2 is pretty fun smile.gif havent tired live yet.. fifa 2006 is pretty good but got to say its not the best fifa i played, but i only like that game because im a soccer fan tongue.gif becuase everyone else says it sucks.. while other soccer fan says its ok
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Golden-Fist on 2005-12-24 at 09:47:50
QUOTE
Notice how it varies toward each reviewer.

It's the same reviewer, guess that crushes your entire arguement.
QUOTE
dude xbox 360 beats revolution you kidding

The revolution isn't out yet you can't compare.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Snipe on 2005-12-24 at 10:09:39
I have waiting to quake 4 for like ever.. But my brother got is and was dissapointed. He said he loved the graphics and such but not the game really. I would have thought it ot be the best ever but i guess not sad.gif.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by KrAzY on 2005-12-25 at 01:46:45
QUOTE(Golden-Moose @ Dec 24 2005, 06:47 AM)
It's the same reviewer, guess that crushes your entire arguement.

The revolution isn't out yet you can't compare.
[right][snapback]388468[/snapback][/right]

You can still compare with the controllers and the looks of the console. And so called same reviewer, why won't you make a company, get a group of people that you don't know of, all of you make ratings, average it out.

You should at least stop being an Xbox 360 hater, and should stop repeating that over and over again. I'm not a PlayStation 3 or a Nintendo Revolution hater, but I'm no fanboy. Earlier, you just said "Are you sure it's not the Xenon?" which is totally off topic, I just said it had poor frame rate on the Xbox 360, but why do you have to say that Xbox 360 is crap because of that? It's Id Software's fault for making that problem for the Xbox 360 and not testing the lag. You don't have to bring another topic into this situation.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by UN-Rommel on 2005-12-26 at 17:16:41
Boyscout for CoD2, the online is horrible. 95% of the time it is laggy as heck and you want to leave and once you leave, people send you leave early feedback. There isn't even ranked matches on it but it says there is and you are bored half the time. For Quake 4, there is a leaderboard, different weapons you pick up in the game like halo, you run fast, you don't reload online, and you can have parties so your friends can play with you. CoD2, its pure luck if you get to play with your friends.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Cloud on 2005-12-26 at 22:56:44
lol marine..you only like quake 4 becuz ur ranked 2nd in the nation or w/e.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Felagund on 2005-12-27 at 11:14:39
Quake 4 can't compare to CoD or CoD2. Hell, UT2004 > Quake 4.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Caboose on 2005-12-27 at 11:25:59
QUOTE(Mp)Cloud @ Dec 26 2005, 10:56 PM)
lol marine..you only like quake 4 becuz ur ranked 2nd in the nation or w/e.
[right][snapback]390420[/snapback][/right]


ohmy.gif Marine is ranked 2nd in the nation? ohmy.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by littlemonkey128 on 2005-12-27 at 12:01:14
Well My friends bought Quake 4 for his Xbox 360... And damn its pretty werid.... But Quake 2 on Quake 4 IS damn fun
Report, edit, etc...Posted by KrAzY on 2005-12-27 at 13:19:01
Playing Quake 4 is fun, but the retarded review I heard from it that gave a really good rating, rocket launch yourself.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Golden-Fist on 2005-12-27 at 14:49:13
QUOTE(KrAzY @ Dec 25 2005, 01:46 AM)
You can still compare with the controllers and the looks of the console.

You can compare how things LOOK, but that's it.

QUOTE
You should at least stop being an Xbox 360 hater,

I'm not, it's not a hidden fact that the Quake 4 xbox360 version has a bad frame rate. Maybe you should start reading things and not just thing "WTF HE DISIN DEH THREE60!!O$NE!"
QUOTE
"Are you sure it's not the Xenon?" which is totally off topic, I just said it had poor frame rate on the Xbox 360, but why do you have to say that Xbox 360 is crap because of that? It's Id Software's fault for making that problem for the Xbox 360 and not testing the lag. You don't have to bring another topic into this situation.
[right][snapback]389167[/snapback][/right]

I don't know where the rest of that post driffted off to, but it was a joke/mock. You don't have to get all defensive on it. And I never said the 360 was crap, try reading what I said and not making up things I could've said. Like my first post, you didn't even read it, you just saw "blows" and 360" on the same line. Here's the acutally post:
"The PC version is fine, the 360 version blows."
Here's what you read:
"THE 360 IS SUO GHEY LOL FUKFUFUKFKUKFUK"

QUOTE(Mp)Marine @ Dec 26 2005, 05:16 PM)
Boyscout for CoD2, the online is horrible. 95% of the time it is laggy
[right][snapback]390241[/snapback][/right]

Acutally its horrible because it sucks. So boring :/
Report, edit, etc...Posted by KrAzY on 2005-12-27 at 15:00:06
QUOTE(Golden-Moose @ Dec 27 2005, 11:49 AM)
You can compare how things LOOK, but that's it.
[right][snapback]390873[/snapback][/right]

OK.

QUOTE(Golden-Moose @ Dec 27 2005, 11:49 AM)
I'm not, it's not a hidden fact that the Quake 4 xbox360 version has a bad frame rate. Maybe you should start reading things and not just thing "WTF HE DISIN DEH THREE60!!O$NE!"
[right][snapback]390873[/snapback][/right]

OK.

QUOTE(Golden-Moose @ Dec 27 2005, 11:49 AM)
I don't know where the rest of that post driffted off to, but it was a joke/mock. You don't have to get all defensive on it. And I never said the 360 was crap, try reading what I said and not making up things I could've said. Like my first post, you didn't even read it, you just saw "blows" and 360" on the same line. Here's the acutally post:
"The PC version is fine, the 360 version blows."
Here's what you read:
"THE 360 IS SUO GHEY LOL FUKFUFUKFKUKFUK"
[right][snapback]390873[/snapback][/right]

No.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by UN-Rommel on 2005-12-27 at 22:55:00
QUOTE(Mp)Cloud @ Dec 26 2005, 08:56 PM)
lol marine..you only like quake 4 becuz ur ranked 2nd in the nation or w/e.
[right][snapback]390420[/snapback][/right]

Thats only partly true. (How the fark did you find that out) Anyhow, i enjoy all of id software's creation, but it seems that they either have a good single player and sucky online or they have a piece of crap single player and a pwning online. In this case, quake 4 pwns online and the single player is just alright, not something you would treasure. Doom3 was the best thing i've seen from id software. That and fear should be the best first person shooters.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathawk on 2005-12-27 at 23:00:01
How about quake 1?
That was the best FPS ever, and don't forget it's online play.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Lisk on 2005-12-28 at 15:20:22
You mean QuakeWorld. Quake 1 sucked for netcode tongue.gif

some quake 4 movies:
http://own-age.com/vids/list.aspx?game=69
smile.gif

I was suprised by q4's single. Great. Not too happy with the current multyplayer wink.gif



Next Page (1)