Staredit Network

As you all know, Quake 4 is now out for xbox 360. The graphics are amazing, the story line is great but not as good as doom3, visuals are impecable, and the gameplay is realisticly fun. This game is destined to be the number 1 hit of 2006 and will probably be the only predecesser to doom3 or even perhaps doom4 once that comes out. Go ahead and post your opinions about Quake 4 here.

In GameSpot, it had to hit one of the Worst Game ever, because of "Most Aggravating Frame Rate / Best Slideshow" game. I would give it a good rating but it has a 6.6 on GameSpot.

That just doesn't make sense, my computer is pretty old, and it ran perfectly with the settings cranked up 1280x1024 res, 4x antialiasing, and maxed detail on everything else.
No game reveiwer in their right mind would have a machine worse than mine, so we must make one of two assumptions.
1.) Gamespot game reviewers have suffered heavy brain damage (quite possible)
or
2.)The gamespot reviewers are running a machine that belongs in a museam.

Just for reference, I'm running a homemade system, using a nvidia 6800, 2.0 amd sempron processor, and a gig of ram, a far cry from a modern gaming machine.

He's talking about for the 360 pointdexter. The PC version is fine, the 360 version blows.

The Xbox 360 doesn't blow.

Yeah it does... 360 won't even compare to the Rev and PS3... Prolly what's MAYBE gonna save it from the Rev and PS3 is Halo 3.

Are you sure it's not the Xenon?
And yeah the frame rate for quake 4 on 360, sucks.

Quake 4 on X360 is crap.

Now, the PC version pwns. I just got it for Christmas

I don't think that way about it. It has a tight online if it ever works due to x360 has issues. Whats the difference between the pc and x360 for single anyhow, it still has close to same graphics and it has a much easier controling system. Then again thats just my opinion but it is basically the same thing when comparing it. Also for the note, gamespot is not the only rating reviewers. Game informer gave it a 7.0 but for xbox, they gave it a 9.0. Notice how it varies toward each reviewer.

dude xbox 360 beats revolution you kidding.. i guess its becuase i dont like nintendo but they dont know what they doing, DS = crap i cant expect revolution to be any better, the reason is their target is at kids now... they think mario will win the game maybe when i was like 10 and i thought 100 bucks was the biggest thing in the world yea i was like omfg its a gamecube 100 bucks cheaper i should get that for sure but now 100 bucks is like jezz for that piece of crap

now between xbox 360 and ps3 that all depends on who you like more... but the winner it all can be figured out once ps3 comes out for now we cant even say it, becuase i bet they both have their ups and downs. but tell you the truth i cant really see that much of diff, at max its only slightly better overall wont make much diff..


but about quake 4 on 360 not sure but cod2 is pretty fun havent tired live yet.. fifa 2006 is pretty good but got to say its not the best fifa i played, but i only like that game because im a soccer fan becuase everyone else says it sucks.. while other soccer fan says its ok

It's the same reviewer, guess that crushes your entire arguement.

The revolution isn't out yet you can't compare.

I have waiting to quake 4 for like ever.. But my brother got is and was dissapointed. He said he loved the graphics and such but not the game really. I would have thought it ot be the best ever but i guess not .

You can still compare with the controllers and the looks of the console. And so called same reviewer, why won't you make a company, get a group of people that you don't know of, all of you make ratings, average it out.

You should at least stop being an Xbox 360 hater, and should stop repeating that over and over again. I'm not a PlayStation 3 or a Nintendo Revolution hater, but I'm no fanboy. Earlier, you just said "Are you sure it's not the Xenon?" which is totally off topic, I just said it had poor frame rate on the Xbox 360, but why do you have to say that Xbox 360 is crap because of that? It's Id Software's fault for making that problem for the Xbox 360 and not testing the lag. You don't have to bring another topic into this situation.

Boyscout for CoD2, the online is horrible. 95% of the time it is laggy as heck and you want to leave and once you leave, people send you leave early feedback. There isn't even ranked matches on it but it says there is and you are bored half the time. For Quake 4, there is a leaderboard, different weapons you pick up in the game like halo, you run fast, you don't reload online, and you can have parties so your friends can play with you. CoD2, its pure luck if you get to play with your friends.

lol marine..you only like quake 4 becuz ur ranked 2nd in the nation or w/e.

Quake 4 can't compare to CoD or CoD2. Hell, UT2004 > Quake 4.

Marine is ranked 2nd in the nation?

Well My friends bought Quake 4 for his Xbox 360... And damn its pretty werid.... But Quake 2 on Quake 4 IS damn fun

Playing Quake 4 is fun, but the retarded review I heard from it that gave a really good rating, rocket launch yourself.

You can compare how things LOOK, but that's it.


I'm not, it's not a hidden fact that the Quake 4 xbox360 version has a bad frame rate. Maybe you should start reading things and not just thing "WTF HE DISIN DEH THREE60!!O$NE!"

I don't know where the rest of that post driffted off to, but it was a joke/mock. You don't have to get all defensive on it. And I never said the 360 was crap, try reading what I said and not making up things I could've said. Like my first post, you didn't even read it, you just saw "blows" and 360" on the same line. Here's the acutally post:
"The PC version is fine, the 360 version blows."
Here's what you read:
"THE 360 IS SUO GHEY LOL FUKFUFUKFKUKFUK"


Acutally its horrible because it sucks. So boring :/

OK.


OK.


No.

Thats only partly true. (How the fark did you find that out) Anyhow, i enjoy all of id software's creation, but it seems that they either have a good single player and sucky online or they have a piece of crap single player and a pwning online. In this case, quake 4 pwns online and the single player is just alright, not something you would treasure. Doom3 was the best thing i've seen from id software. That and fear should be the best first person shooters.

How about quake 1?
That was the best FPS ever, and don't forget it's online play.

You mean QuakeWorld. Quake 1 sucked for netcode

some quake 4 movies:
http://own-age.com/vids/list.aspx?game=69


I was suprised by q4's single. Great. Not too happy with the current multyplayer