Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> Miscellaneous -> I'm sorry moose for this >.<
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-12-30 at 14:25:41
Mr. Moose. I am terribly sorry for posting this "spammious" thread, but I just wish to get my points across, because I believe (In my eyes) that I have some valid points. If you wish that I be warned for this, than warn me. I mean no mallicious intent with this now locked thread, and only wish to settle the disputes within my mind.

With that being said, here we go:

QUOTE(Deathknight @ Dec 30 2005, 09:41 AM)
Not if you didn't even know or care about that person in the first place, and you're just changing the avatar because some idiot decided it would be "respectful", and you're just copying him/her.

Quoted for reference:
"picture of their loved one"
[right][snapback]393846[/snapback][/right]


So you're saying, that because nuclearrabbit defended me, and gained my respect, i'm just some "idiot who decided it would be 'respectfull' and you're just copying him/her"?

Where is the logic in that? Isn't that what you're about, logic?

I will continue to have her avatar within my signature, because she respected me, and by having it within there, I see that is the only way that I may respect her back.

QUOTE(Deathknight @ Dec 30 2005, 09:47 AM)
You have no say in this topic. You thought of suicide, therefore you lose.

Remember:
[right][snapback]393852[/snapback][/right]


That's a logical fallacy my friend.

Just because someone speakes of suicide, doesn't mean they are wrong. I think Mr. Tizzle has an excellent point. But you come in here, and flame them because your opinion is different than theres. Also, most of the following replies by you, are spammious, too.

Everyone has a say in ANY topic. What makes it so they may not? Just because your opinion is different from theres? Isn't that a litte hard-headedness/narrow-mindedness/close-mindedness?

I understand the anger you are probibly feeling, but that doesn't give you the right to say no one has a say in a topic, or just because they thought of suicide, they lose the debate (With that logic, just because i've actually tried commiting suicide, that no matter what, I automatically lose.. Even with plausible arguements...) I see no intelligence in that.

QUOTE(Deathknight @ Dec 30 2005, 09:52 AM)
I'm quoting your ironic comparison. Can you prove that Nucclearrabbit wanted avatars and signatures for rememberance?
[right][snapback]393856[/snapback][/right]


Hmm... Logical Fallacy (Ad Hominem Abusive) Really Death, where is your "logic" today?

And no. We cannot prove that miss rabbit wanted avatars and signatures for rememberance, but can you?

Also. If you're going to use that arguement, do you really think that the people that passed on in the World Trade Centers, really wish to be remembered by having paintings, drawings, sketches, ect... of the Twin Towers?

QUOTE(Deathknight @ Dec 30 2005, 10:27 AM)
You're turning one's death into a game, and it appears as though you're celebrating the death.
[right][snapback]393898[/snapback][/right]


How are we turning someones death into a game?

If I play a song at a funeral, or sing a song at a funeral, that talks about all the good times (Within' the song. Not the actual good times you had with the individual), does that automatically make me disrespectful, because I wish to honor the individual in the only way or form I can see fit?

Seriously Death. Where in the hell is your logic today?

QUOTE(Deathknight @ Dec 30 2005, 10:48 AM)
Maybe it does.

Why are you challenging our point of view, and stating that somehow what we think is "wrong"?

BTW I suggest you to open your eyes and admit you think wrong...
[right][snapback]393919[/snapback][/right]


Because we can.

And just because your opinion conflicts with ours, does not mean we are wrong (Logical Fallacy)

I've read through this, and I have to say that you death, are the one that is wrong. You believe that since we wish to hold a tournament, and just so happens to be "dedicated" it to nuclear, that we are disrespecting her.

Again I bring up the funeral arguement. Maybe this is the only way we see fit, to honor the death of nuclearrabbit, and the only way we can truely see to pay our respects?

QUOTE(Deathknight @ Dec 30 2005, 11:04 AM)
I love you moose! <3

Shut up Silver-Dragon. You know nothing.
[right][snapback]393933[/snapback][/right]


Way to suckup.

And another, logical fallacy. You claim that Silver-Dragon knows nothing, because his opinion is against yours.

Is that really a good way to debate or discuss something??

QUOTE(Deathknight @ Dec 30 2005, 11:10 AM)
This is obviously his little brother. Could you not work that out for yourself? Obviously you can't prove I'm not, so I must automatically be his little brother.
[right][snapback]393940[/snapback][/right]


Logical fallacy.

Of course we cannot prove that you are his little brother, or vice versa, so why even try to start an arguement with those grounds? That is plain idiocy, so why even try to argue with it?

QUOTE(Deathknight @ Dec 30 2005, 11:17 AM)
Which proves this topic shouldn't exist, and the news post should have been locked from the beginning.

It also proves that evolution exists.  smile.gif
[right][snapback]393950[/snapback][/right]


"My logic is undeniable" - VIKI; I-Robot.

That is the attitude that I see comming from you Death.

No where does it "prove" that this topic should not exist (enless you mean the flammious and spammious attitude you brought here) so why make those claims when in fact you are the one that has broughten the flames and spam?

Care for me to point it out for you? :

QUOTE(DeathKnight)
Not if you didn't even know or care about that person in the first place, and you're just changing the avatar because some idiot decided it would be "respectful", and you're just copying him/her.

Quoted for reference:
"picture of their loved one"

You have no say in this topic. You thought of suicide, therefore you lose.

Remember: (Whatever you have quoted here)

I'm quoting your ironic comparison. Can you prove that Nucclearrabbit wanted avatars and signatures for rememberance?

(This one is not spam, and is the only one I see that is a reasonable argument, but i'll put it anyways): You're turning one's death into a game, and it appears as though you're celebrating the death.

(This following is spam, because you showed no evidence that we are wrong): Maybe it does.

Why are you challenging our point of view, and stating that somehow what we think is "wrong"?

BTW I suggest you to open your eyes and admit you think wrong...

I love you moose! <3

Shut up Silver-Dragon. You know nothing.

(This is the most spammious replie in the thread because why point out the obvious?): This is obviously his little brother. Could you not work that out for yourself? Obviously you can't prove I'm not, so I must automatically be his little brother.

Which proves this topic shouldn't exist, and the news post should have been locked from the beginning.

It also proves that evolution exists.  smile.gif


So.. May I aske why exactly you have proceeded to flame us all, and to spam the thread? Is it because your opinion conflicts with ours?

Please clarify to me via PM.

NOTE: I will take action against you if you don't shape up within' the PM if you PM me.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mini Moose 2707 on 2005-12-30 at 14:51:03
You might as well PMed deathknight. From what I see, Deathknight wasn't referring to you most of the time. Just let the issue rest.
Next Page (1)