Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> Miscellaneous -> True or False:
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kame on 2006-01-03 at 23:58:56
I have heard from several people (who shall remain anonymous) that the members who have been around longer feel different on some decisions than the newer members. Is this true? Do you believe that sides usually consist of New Members vs. Old Members in forum decisions?

[ps mods: this may go under feedback. If you feel it does (it may get more opinions) move it.]
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Zombie on 2006-01-04 at 00:32:26
i voted true, hell ive been here for awile to wink.gif.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Sie_Sayoka on 2006-01-04 at 00:40:36
there should be an i dont know answer... ive been here for like 2 months and im a regular :0
Report, edit, etc...Posted by KrAzY on 2006-01-04 at 00:41:14
Anonymous Users are Terrorists, like I, Terrorist #1.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2006-01-04 at 00:59:37
Members seem to come in generations.

There's the really old generation, say pre Jan 2004.
Then there's the later old generation, say my ilk (Jan. 2004 - Jul. 2004 server crash)
Then there's the summer 2004 generation (server crash - Oct. 2004 [Yoshi left 1st time])
Then there's the new mainstay generation (Oct. 2004 - Yoshi's return in, what? Jan. 2005)
Then there's the older newbies (Feb. 2005 - Jul. 2005)
Then there's the totally new members (Jul. 2005 forward).

Non-active posters don't count.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kame on 2006-01-04 at 01:03:11
Aw. I came Feb 2004. I'm second generation! woot!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Syphon on 2006-01-04 at 01:10:37
QUOTE(DT_Battlekruser @ Jan 4 2006, 12:59 AM)
Members seem to come in generations.

There's the really old generation, say pre Jan 2004.
Then there's the later old generation, say my ilk (Jan. 2004 - Jul. 2004 server crash)
Then there's the summer 2004 generation (server crash - Oct. 2004 [Yoshi left 1st time])
Then there's the new mainstay generation (Oct. 2004 - Yoshi's return in, what? Jan. 2005)
Then there's the older newbies (Feb. 2005 - Jul. 2005)
Then there's the totally new members (Jul. 2005 forward).

Non-active posters don't count.

[right][snapback]398038[/snapback][/right]


I'm an exception, when people join and meet me i bet they don't think I'm totally new tongue.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Arbitrary on 2006-01-04 at 01:31:23
Only if you're Kellimus.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by SiLeNT(U) on 2006-01-04 at 01:35:20
I think there is, they just act different...

On another note, I registered in Mar 16 2004, 11:07 PM, so I'm in the Later Old Generation tongue.gif

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Rantent on 2006-01-04 at 01:53:49
I'm early new mainstay generation. I guess that makes me gemini. blink.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Cloud on 2006-01-04 at 02:07:48
i think how you go up to regular and shiz shouldnt be decided by just the forum posts, there should be a time that the person joined sen.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2006-01-04 at 03:47:46
QUOTE(KrAzY @ Jan 3 2006, 09:41 PM)
Anonymous Users are Terrorists, like I, Terrorist #1.
[right][snapback]398022[/snapback][/right]


Terrorist #2
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Screwed on 2006-01-04 at 05:57:56
Heh, I guess I'm the end of the second generation and the beginning of the third. I joined in July 04. =\
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Lisk on 2006-01-04 at 07:44:36
Joined: 31-August 04
man I'm old ;D was lurking before that smile.gif

Just feels like older members don't take newer ones seriously...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by CaptainWill on 2006-01-04 at 08:31:52
Second Generation member here - June '04

I don't mind the new members unless they have flame wars, which have died down for the moment.

I think the older members have felt a bit swamped recently though - our numbers have been declining while the numbers of new regular members has increased steadily. I guess a feeling of isolation in a sea of new faces occasionally creeps in to some of our thoughts.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by BeeR_KeG on 2006-01-04 at 08:32:37
QUOTE(DT_Battlekruser @ Jan 4 2006, 01:59 AM)
Members seem to come in generations.

There's the really old generation, say pre Jan 2004.
Then there's the later old generation, say my ilk (Jan. 2004 - Jul. 2004 server crash)
Then there's the summer 2004 generation (server crash - Oct. 2004 [Yoshi left 1st time])
Then there's the new mainstay generation (Oct. 2004 - Yoshi's return in, what? Jan. 2005)
Then there's the older newbies (Feb. 2005 - Jul. 2005)
Then there's the totally new members (Jul. 2005 forward).

Non-active posters don't count.

[right][snapback]398038[/snapback][/right]


Ah crap? I have no generation! I was born during the server crash!

Server crash was from June 25, 2004 to July 15, 2004. All data from June 15 to June 25 was lost. I had created my account on June 20, 2004 but had to re-create it on July 15, 2004. Same with CheeZe.

I guess it's second generation anyways...


Back on topic. Yes Kame, I'm one of the memebrs that feels that way. Back in 2004 I felt like if everybody knew everybody. Even when I was made Staff in October 2004, when IP first came to the scene, I still felt like if I knew everbody. It was until Yoshi's return in Jan 2005 that brought a wave of new people in that I started to feel that the good old days of the white and blue SeNv3 were gone. Since that time, more and more of the old members have retired, like Shadow_Paladin, qPirateKing, Ent, Dabbu, SpaceBoy and a few others that don't come to my mind right now. Since this time, I've been feeling like if we old members are getting more and more left out of the main community and we sort of are setting up our own, smaller community within the big one. (That's one of the reasons why the High Templar forum was created).

Today I have a lot of people going like: "Hey beer, how's it going?", and I try to speak to them but this statement always passes through my mins: "Who are you?".

And regarding forum desicions, yes we do tend to see a change in opinions. We older members tend to be more conservative and efficient. The newer generations tend to work more towards appearance and complexity.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Doodan on 2006-01-04 at 10:18:40
Hmmm... I joined in June of 2005, but I didn't actually start posting until the end of July. I guess that makes me a newbie newbie. tongue.gif I've been around long enough to see some change.

There's definitely a difference. I agree with Beer on the whole conservative/efficient vs. complexity. Older members are like crocodiles and turtles in that they have stood the test of time from evolution (bear with me on the analogy). While the newer mammals may be flashier, quicker, and hyperactive, the old reptiles know how to survive against all types of species and will bite the hell out of you if you get in their way.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Chronophobia on 2006-01-04 at 10:39:29
8- November 2004 as Slayer[SP]. I feel kinda home here now biggrin.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by HorroR on 2006-01-04 at 10:43:27
QUOTE(DT_Battlekruser @ Jan 4 2006, 12:59 AM)
Members seem to come in generations.

There's the really old generation, say pre Jan 2004.
Then there's the later old generation, say my ilk (Jan. 2004 - Jul. 2004 server crash)
Then there's the summer 2004 generation (server crash - Oct. 2004 [Yoshi left 1st time])
Then there's the new mainstay generation (Oct. 2004 - Yoshi's return in, what? Jan. 2005)
Then there's the older newbies (Feb. 2005 - Jul. 2005)
Then there's the totally new members (Jul. 2005 forward).

Non-active posters don't count.

[right][snapback]398038[/snapback][/right]


Aw damn. I'm an old newb. (February I joined). And I say there is a division.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Snipe)r( on 2006-01-04 at 10:49:09
QUOTE(DT_Battlekruser @ Jan 3 2006, 11:59 PM)
Members seem to come in generations.

There's the really old generation, say pre Jan 2004.
Then there's the later old generation, say my ilk (Jan. 2004 - Jul. 2004 server crash)
Then there's the summer 2004 generation (server crash - Oct. 2004 [Yoshi left 1st time])
Then there's the new mainstay generation (Oct. 2004 - Yoshi's return in, what? Jan. 2005)
Then there's the older newbies (Feb. 2005 - Jul. 2005)
Then there's the totally new members (Jul. 2005 forward).

Non-active posters don't count.

[right][snapback]398038[/snapback][/right]

well i'm an "Older Newbie" i guess according to my profile i joined April, 11 2005

Back on topic: I dont really know the answer...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Sessase on 2006-01-04 at 10:49:41
Then there's the later old generation, say my ilk (Jan. 2004 - Jul. 2004 server crash)

I've been here since June 2004... and I agree with Keg_beer. Too many things happened and many good friend of mine left. anyway, I don't see many difference between new members and Old Members. Most of the older Members are more mature than newer people. But the Huge difference is that the older Know more about SEN and what happened. How I can say ... SEN Became a big family for older.. So it's always sad to see someone leaving the community.

I can't express my self much, lack of word, but maybe you understand what I mean.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Syphon on 2006-01-04 at 14:13:06
QUOTE(S.T.A.R.S-Chris @ Jan 4 2006, 03:47 AM)
Terrorist #2
[right][snapback]398129[/snapback][/right]


Nuke was #2. I am #3.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2006-01-04 at 14:56:26
I'm a summer 2004 generationer. ohmy.gif

There is a difference. The older members are looked up to and their opinions carry alot of weight.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MapUnprotector on 2006-01-04 at 14:56:38
Its true of course smile.gif

I feel far superior to the new people biggrin.gif

I joined like right after server crash I think. I remember trying to visit the site a few times before yet the site was always down, and then one day it finally worked so I joined.

Joined: 24-July 04
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kow on 2006-01-04 at 15:08:52
mellow.gif I'm older than Devilesk! I vaguely remember the server crash, I think I joined right before it occured. I wasn't very active until later, though.

Politically, I see no difference in opinions, but when it comes to site matters, I see a huge difference (as previously stated)
Next Page (1)