QUOTE(Golden-Fist @ Feb 26 2006, 12:26 PM)
Your card costs more and has overheating problems ^_^
Plus we posted a minute apart ;o
[right][snapback]435091[/snapback][/right]
Um, the 6600GT doesn't have overheating problems. Are you high?
His link is a GT version of what you linked (the vanilla 6600), which is basically an upclocked version of your card. It has no real differences, but both cards, while decent, are fairly low end by today's standards.
QUOTE(Falcon_A @ Feb 26 2006, 01:00 PM)
Hell, I use a Ge-Force 4 MX that's got 64 megs of ram, on a pentium 3 1000mhz processor with only 256 megs of ram, and UT:2004 runs perfectly on nearly maxxed settings.
When my system doesn't even meet the minimal requirements..
I got it for like 70 bucks at circuity city or something when it was on sale..and it runs everything except games that say i need 'pixel shading 1.2' or some crap like that, such as dues ex invisible war. =( If you ask me, that video card is teh Über 1337, but im sure other people have other such things to say about it
[right][snapback]435106[/snapback][/right]
The GeForce 4 MX is something that I like to call a "total piece of
shit", for lack of a better term. Avoid it
at all costs. It strangely doesn't support pixel shading in the light of the fact that its predecessor, the GeForce 3 was the card that pioneered it. If you want a GF4, get the Ti version.
However, you don't want a GF4 at all
.
QUOTE(urmom @ Feb 26 2006, 01:19 PM)
Hmm, now I'm looking at
this one. That one seems a bit better than the previous one I suggested. How can I tell if it would fit my computer though?
[right][snapback]435112[/snapback][/right]
Here's a tip for you:
don't get anything below the previous generation of cards from ATI/nvidia, which are the X800 and 6800 series, respectively. You won't get the most out of your money if you do otherwise. Also, don't get cards that can't run today's games, let alone tomorrow's. When upgrading, it's best to get a mid-range to high-end solution that will serve you for a couple of years in the future.
The card you linked, a 5200 FX, was a crappy deal when it came out (it was a low end model of nvidia's poor answer to the 9800 series), and is virtually worthless now. It won't run you any of today's games at decent settings (for example, Doom 3, which came out 1 1/2 years ago).
The 6200 is only slightly faster than the 5200 FX. The main improvement there is multimedia features (like video codec acceleration, etc). I'd advise you not to get it either, since it's not for gaming. While it can run some basic/older games, like the 5200 FX, it probably won't run you the games you will want to either.
The X1300 is ATi's low-end solution of the current-generation cards. Many of the above comments apply here.
The only cards mentioned in this thread worth getting are the 6600 and the 6600GT. Get either if you're low on cash. They can play most (if not all) of today's games on decent settings, and might do so for at least a while in the future. The best time to get this card was in the end of 2004, a few months after it originally came out, but it will still serve you well today.
All of the cards mentioned so far are mid-range or low-end. That means no or little overclocking value. If you're into that, get what I'm about to suggest.
If I were to make a decision on this, I'd say the
vanilla 6800 would work best. For the money, you won't find a better deal. It runs all of today's games on decent to high settings. If you can get your dad to fork up just a bit more money (only 100 bucks after $30 mail-in rebate), this should be the choice. It's actually the high-end (though not bleeding-edge like the GT or Ultra versions) of last generation cards. It will serve you well for at least a year more (in terms of decent-to-high settings in games).
The "overclocking value" of this card that I talked about is the fact that you can unlock the 4 extra pixel pipes & a vertex shader pipe. While this might not work for you (it works for most people though), if it does, the card will be brought up almost to the GT level of performance (assuming you bring up the clock too). Of course, just bringing up the clock speed/memory speed settings is fine as well (these cards are also ripe for that).
It should go without saying that you shouldn't attempt any of this with stock cooling.
HOWEVER:If you have an AGP slot instead of a PCI-Express slot, get
this version of the card instead. It's only worse in the regard that it has 128 megs of memory instead of 256 like the one I linked before. What this means in terms of gaming is that games with lots of high-res textures (like BF2) won't run as well. However, you should still attain decent settings with good FPS.
ADDITION:
The majorgeeks.com forums may not know your exact computer configuration. When they say "PCI", they mean the regular PCI slots and not the PCI-Express slot used by newer graphics cards. The only reason they would say this is because if you bought your computer cheap from Dell or companies like that, they could have stuck in a crappy motherboard in there without AGP/PCI-E. This would leave you royally screwed when it comes to upgrading your video cards.