Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> Miscellaneous -> When do you think SC 2 is comming out?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Ice_Inferno_X3 on 2006-03-08 at 23:08:01
I think its comming out sometime in 2009+

EDIT:
I accidently voted for 2006...oh well!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Arbitrary on 2006-03-08 at 23:08:26
2008 at the earliest
Report, edit, etc...Posted by SiLeNT(U) on 2006-03-08 at 23:29:00
I voted never, SC came out in 1998, I don't see why its taking them 8 years to START a sequel.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Shapechanger on 2006-03-08 at 23:33:26
Never, Starcraft: Ghost will fail miserably and the project leader will decide that Starcraft isn't a moneymaker and therefore abandon it.

Whoever decided to turn Starcraft into a Sci-Fi version of Splinter Cell deserves to rot in hell...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by chrono_seifer on 2006-03-09 at 00:01:55
QUOTE(Soulshifter @ Mar 8 2006, 10:33 PM)
Never, Starcraft: Ghost will fail miserably and the project leader will decide that Starcraft isn't a moneymaker and therefore abandon it.

Whoever decided to turn Starcraft into a Sci-Fi version of Splinter Cell deserves to rot in hell...
[right][snapback]441887[/snapback][/right]


i think so too therefor i voted on never

isent it a rumor anyways? The "starcrack" site doenst even have it posted
on upcoming titles right?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by KrAzY on 2006-03-09 at 00:10:22
Can't anyone just drop this? You people already know that some websites makes made up release dates.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2006-03-09 at 00:19:17
SC: Ghost is screwing over Starcraft forever. Starcraft is an RTS, not a FPS.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Demaris on 2006-03-09 at 00:25:01

The moment we all switch to WoW, SC2 comes out. I know it will be like that.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Valug on 2006-03-09 at 08:29:00
[sub]Okay, lets all move to WoW.[/sub]
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Zwitch on 2006-03-09 at 09:16:16
2009+ Unless they decide to make it only playable by monthly payements (like WoW) then they might start as soon as next year, more $$$ for them smile.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Golden-Fist on 2006-03-09 at 09:31:16
QUOTE(DT_Battlekruser @ Mar 9 2006, 12:19 AM)
SC: Ghost is screwing over Starcraft forever.  Starcraft is an RTS, not a FPS.
[right][snapback]441919[/snapback][/right]

War Craft 3 wasn't a MMORPG either, but that is now the most popular game in the market and has over 6 million players.
QUOTE
I voted never, SC came out in 1998, I don't see why its taking them 8 years to START a sequel.

They didn't START IT because they didn't WANT TO. If they wanted to make Starcraft 2 they'll start when they want, they wanted to try things like WoW, WC3, and other projects.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Diggidoyo on 2006-03-09 at 10:07:35
Didn't they abandon Diablo as well? But I know that has something to do with Blizzard North leaving or something......... DAMN BLIZZARD

ADDITION:
And the 2 people who voted for 2006 are morons. pinch.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Teh_Bun-Bun on 2006-03-09 at 10:43:29
[center]Isn't SC one of Blizzard's most successful games ever? If they don't make SC 2, Korea is going to fall apart.[/center]
Report, edit, etc...Posted by NightCircle on 2006-03-09 at 13:18:05
I voted for 2009+ since I think it will come out sometime, but in the far future.
StarCraft is such a good game that they HAVE to make a StarCraft 2.

At least from what I think smile.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by adam2new on 2006-03-09 at 14:37:49
As I heard (forgot where), StarCraft: Ghost will be a FPS of StarCraft 2
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kyuubi. on 2006-03-09 at 14:45:49
i think it might come out in 2008...but nevertheless blizzard always take ages to releases a sequel or a new game...anyway are people certain that they will title it starcraft 2?is it the best name they can come up with?i think they would title it something else...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Golden-Fist on 2006-03-09 at 15:57:12
QUOTE(Teh_Bun-Bun @ Mar 9 2006, 10:43 AM)
[center]Isn't SC one of Blizzard's most successful games ever?[/center]
[right][snapback]442038[/snapback][/right]

That's why it's so hard to make a sequel. Seriously, say that to yourself. A sequel to one of the most successful games, EVER.
QUOTE
Didn't they abandon Diablo as well?

There's rumors of a Diablo 3 coming out for the 360 or something. BeeR made a post about it in games a while ago.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by JordanN_3335 on 2006-03-09 at 16:10:12
That guy a couple of posts is right. If they were to make SC2 then why would it be 8 years. Face it. They can only make SC2 after people get familer with SCG.
Besides its blizzard next think you know they can do it anytime they want or mess with like next thing you know SCG will reveal nova is kerrigans daughter but thats just for thought sick.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheEvilBeaVer on 2006-03-09 at 16:39:29
They can't just abbandon SC-that's the one of the best-selling games in history.Just wait for Blizzard to finish Diablo3 and they will start SC2.Making SC2 will require a lot of time if they are not planning to make "Orcs in Space2-this time in WarCraft3 engine" biggrin.gif so i vote 2009+
Report, edit, etc...Posted by HolySin on 2006-03-09 at 22:50:41
Didn't Blizzard even say that they would not make Starcraft II or Diablo III?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2006-03-09 at 22:50:48
QUOTE
War Craft 3 wasn't a MMORPG either, but that is now the most popular game in the market and has over 6 million players.


At least they actually did the sensible thing and made it for PC.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by VizuaL on 2006-03-09 at 23:16:20
when do u think these topics will stop?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Shapechanger on 2006-03-09 at 23:25:28
I honestly don't see how Starcraft could get better.
More units? Sure, a few maybe, but too many and you start getting them mixed up, confused. Nobody new would try it because forming strategies would be too complicated, not to mention the amount of extra buildings and tech tree branches that would have to come with it, along with the spells/abilities that you would have to manage.
Better graphics? Since there are so many units on the screen at any given time, RTS games always have lesser graphics than their RPG/FPS/etc. counterparts. Starcraft was supposed to be a serious, rusted future sort of game, and 2D simply suites that too well. By going 3D you risk ruining the overall image of the game, thought they're already doing that with Ghost... cry.gif
Extra Races? The same as more units, a few are fine, too many and you complicate the game so that it is no longer fun. If you want to stand a chance against somebody playing a different race than you, you have to know that race inside and out; what counters it, what strengths/weaknesses it has, etc. Too many races and you start to get confused/mix things up.

And lastly, imagine how hard it would be to keep the perfect balance that Stracraft has created. With every unit must come a perectly equal counterpart for every other race. Every new race must be equal to the old races, and so forth.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Doodan on 2006-03-10 at 00:23:11
QUOTE(HolySin @ Mar 9 2006, 10:50 PM)
Didn't Blizzard even say that they would not make Starcraft II or Diablo III?
[right][snapback]442425[/snapback][/right]

They never said never. They have just announced (many times) that they don't CURRENTLY have SC2 or a Diablo game under development.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Diggidoyo on 2006-03-10 at 20:50:10
QUOTE(HolySin @ Mar 9 2006 @ 10:50 PM)
Didn't Blizzard even say that they would not make Starcraft II or Diablo III?


Honestly, I don't think they have a choice. happy.gif
Next Page (1)