Report, edit, etc...Posted by Slyence on 2006-04-23 at 23:00:48
This is such bullshiz. The Seattle city council ruled that strip clubs here can no longer have lap dances, private rooms, or have strippers within 4 feet of the customers. Supposedly this law was made to "protect families" but that's retarded because strip clubs are already pretty isolated in this city and there's only 4 of them to begin with, and none of them have the sleazy, underworld culture of the strip clubs in places like Tacoma and Whitecenter. The real reason they made this law is to spit in the face of activists who worked to destroy the archaic "no new strip clubs" law that came into effect 1988 and was struck down recently.
Seattle has shizty traffic, a stumbling economy, major Boeing problems, and a government that pays jack shiz attention to its voters. Seattle voted down both of the new sports stadiums but the government built them anyway. Gee, couldn't we have spent all that money on the farking monorail that we're about 2 or 3 billion dollars short for constructing? We passed the monorail resolution 4 times but the mayor is this close to shutting down the project permanently, and now the city council finally gets off its lazy ass and does something it hasn't in years, it takes a position on something. And that position is that the good citizens of our city who have been getting layed off their jobs and had their benefits slashed shouldn't be allowed to get a lap dance at one of our four strip clubs.
Seattle has shizty traffic, a stumbling economy, major Boeing problems, and a government that pays jack shiz attention to its voters. Seattle voted down both of the new sports stadiums but the government built them anyway. Gee, couldn't we have spent all that money on the farking monorail that we're about 2 or 3 billion dollars short for constructing? We passed the monorail resolution 4 times but the mayor is this close to shutting down the project permanently, and now the city council finally gets off its lazy ass and does something it hasn't in years, it takes a position on something. And that position is that the good citizens of our city who have been getting layed off their jobs and had their benefits slashed shouldn't be allowed to get a lap dance at one of our four strip clubs.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Falcon_A on 2006-04-23 at 23:37:06
Sucks for you guys. Come over to NY, though we might not even have 4 of 'em in my town ;P
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2006-04-23 at 23:49:21
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Lyon on 2006-04-24 at 00:03:52
thats funny. sorry to hear slyence
guess your gonna have to move eh?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Slyence on 2006-04-24 at 00:29:45
There I go again... Adding crap that has already happened.
*Puts down weed*
*Puts down weed*
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Toothfariy on 2006-04-24 at 16:09:48
its probley cause the goverment hasent been to a strip club ever and they want to piss people off.
you need to move to st louis. we got one heck of a club out here.
you need to move to st louis. we got one heck of a club out here.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by warhammer40000 on 2006-04-24 at 16:57:01
Protect families? You're not protecting families! It's just as useless as censoring just the nipple on TV.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Toothfariy on 2006-04-24 at 17:04:12
true. but it can be distrubing to little babies seeing a nipple thats not their mothers'
Report, edit, etc...Posted by n2o-SiMpSoNs on 2006-04-24 at 19:22:34
I wish boobs on a woman were treated by censors and stuff like that like boobs on a guy. lol
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kellodood on 2006-04-24 at 19:26:57
I like your style
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Syphon on 2006-04-24 at 19:38:08
I'm always disappointing chicks with a no-4 foot rule.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Toothfariy on 2006-04-24 at 19:51:23
QUOTE(n2o-SiMpSoNs @ Apr 24 2006, 05:22 PM)
I wish boobs on a woman were treated by censors and stuff like that like boobs on a guy. lol
[right][snapback]472068[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]472068[/snapback][/right]
that would be nice...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mune'R0x on 2006-04-25 at 17:51:42
There's that few in Seattle? Eff the what?[/NOTRIGHT]
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tmac on 2006-04-25 at 21:36:05
Theres 3 within 15min of my house. (walking)
~Queens~
~Queens~
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mr.Camo on 2006-04-25 at 22:49:20
QUOTE(Slyence @ Apr 23 2006, 07:00 PM)
This is such bullshiz. The Seattle city council ruled that strip clubs here can no longer have lap dances, private rooms, or have strippers within 4 feet of the customers. Supposedly this law was made to "protect families" but that's retarded because strip clubs are already pretty isolated in this city and there's only 4 of them to begin with, and none of them have the sleazy, underworld culture of the strip clubs in places like Tacoma and Whitecenter. The real reason they made this law is to spit in the face of activists who worked to destroy the archaic "no new strip clubs" law that came into effect 1988 and was struck down recently.
Seattle has shizty traffic, a stumbling economy, major Boeing problems, and a government that pays jack shiz attention to its voters. Seattle voted down both of the new sports stadiums but the government built them anyway. Gee, couldn't we have spent all that money on the farking monorail that we're about 2 or 3 billion dollars short for constructing? We passed the monorail resolution 4 times but the mayor is this close to shutting down the project permanently, and now the city council finally gets off its lazy ass and does something it hasn't in years, it takes a position on something. And that position is that the good citizens of our city who have been getting layed off their jobs and had their benefits slashed shouldn't be allowed to get a lap dance at one of our four strip clubs.
[right][snapback]471600[/snapback][/right]
Seattle has shizty traffic, a stumbling economy, major Boeing problems, and a government that pays jack shiz attention to its voters. Seattle voted down both of the new sports stadiums but the government built them anyway. Gee, couldn't we have spent all that money on the farking monorail that we're about 2 or 3 billion dollars short for constructing? We passed the monorail resolution 4 times but the mayor is this close to shutting down the project permanently, and now the city council finally gets off its lazy ass and does something it hasn't in years, it takes a position on something. And that position is that the good citizens of our city who have been getting layed off their jobs and had their benefits slashed shouldn't be allowed to get a lap dance at one of our four strip clubs.
[right][snapback]471600[/snapback][/right]
I heard about this, do you live in Seattle Slyence?
I love the strip clubs in Seattle, great girls, great atmosphere also, and not that "tacky".
I think it's bullcrap also dude.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MillenniumArmy on 2006-04-26 at 01:59:07
QUOTE(Slyence @ Apr 23 2006, 09:00 PM)
This is such bullshiz. The Seattle city council ruled that strip clubs here can no longer have lap dances, private rooms, or have strippers within 4 feet of the customers. Supposedly this law was made to "protect families" but that's retarded because strip clubs are already pretty isolated in this city and there's only 4 of them to begin with, and none of them have the sleazy, underworld culture of the strip clubs in places like Tacoma and Whitecenter. The real reason they made this law is to spit in the face of activists who worked to destroy the archaic "no new strip clubs" law that came into effect 1988 and was struck down recently.
Seattle has shizty traffic, a stumbling economy, major Boeing problems, and a government that pays jack shiz attention to its voters. Seattle voted down both of the new sports stadiums but the government built them anyway. Gee, couldn't we have spent all that money on the farking monorail that we're about 2 or 3 billion dollars short for constructing? We passed the monorail resolution 4 times but the mayor is this close to shutting down the project permanently, and now the city council finally gets off its lazy ass and does something it hasn't in years, it takes a position on something. And that position is that the good citizens of our city who have been getting layed off their jobs and had their benefits slashed shouldn't be allowed to get a lap dance at one of our four strip clubs.
[right][snapback]471600[/snapback][/right]
Seattle has shizty traffic, a stumbling economy, major Boeing problems, and a government that pays jack shiz attention to its voters. Seattle voted down both of the new sports stadiums but the government built them anyway. Gee, couldn't we have spent all that money on the farking monorail that we're about 2 or 3 billion dollars short for constructing? We passed the monorail resolution 4 times but the mayor is this close to shutting down the project permanently, and now the city council finally gets off its lazy ass and does something it hasn't in years, it takes a position on something. And that position is that the good citizens of our city who have been getting layed off their jobs and had their benefits slashed shouldn't be allowed to get a lap dance at one of our four strip clubs.
[right][snapback]471600[/snapback][/right]
That's why you better pack your horse and come on over to Texas, partner!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by CaptainWill on 2006-04-26 at 16:07:50
So they're protecting the families who so often go on outings to strip clubs to see daddy get a lapdance?
WTF?
WTF?