QUOTE(McNasty1114 @ May 4 2006, 04:32 PM)
its funny, i never thought there were people like me on the computer as much as i was and actually good at sports - kids at my school that can do more than turn a computer on are geeks that run a mile in like 20 minutes - i am good with computers and I am top 5 in Maine for soccer, and in track i run the 100m in 11.2, 200m 24.7, i am 15 and i can bench 185 and i weigh 140, and i can make starcraft defense maps, pretty good at everything
[right][snapback]479391[/snapback][/right]
Your time for the 100m is pretty good, but seeing your 100m, your 200m is terrible. Your 200m should be your 100m x2 + a little bit more. I take it that you either train very little, meaning that your legs got tired, or that your 200m time is from a long time ago.
With a 11.2 in the 100m you should be doing at least 23.5 in the 200m.
QUOTE
I take it your a sprinter.
The best I've gotten thus far.
100m: 13ish tongue.gif
200m: Never actually time trialed.
400m: 53.60
800m: 1:58:89 <- Less than one second less and its a school record. pinch.gif
1600m: 4:90:something
I train almost entirely for the 800, and am currently around 4th in state.
Basically I have a slow sprint, but once I reach that speed I don't stop.
Yes, I'm a sprinter. I used to run the 800m and 1500m several years ago, until I ran my first 400m in a 4x400m in 56 seconds, then I've been running all sprinting events.
I used to be a slow started, until I started practicing explosive starts. Now I've got explosive acceleration, a very high speed, and quite some sprinting endurance. With those times, I wouldn't be surprised if you could run a decent 400m hurdles.