Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> Miscellaneous -> How fast can your computer calculate pi?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by n2o-SiMpSoNs on 2006-06-19 at 14:37:20

Everyone knows about pi and this is a good benchmark programme for PC's so... Go Here...

http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/126
(primary Download Site)

Post Your CPU speed and RAM and the time taken to Calculate 1 million Decimal Points. Make sure u select 1M (1million Decimals) Before u start.
World record for normal PC is 17.987s on a P4 clocked to 7.36GHz!! for 1M decimals. Run with no programs running!




my computer does :


16k : at .438 seconds
1m : at 44.172 seconds
16m : at 17 minutes 1.563 seconds


Report, edit, etc...Posted by Syphon on 2006-06-19 at 15:46:30
1m - 37.547 seconds

But I had ObjectDock and iTunes running.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2006-06-19 at 15:56:59

1m - 45.528 seconds

But I had EternalChat, iTunes, 7 folders, WinMPQ, TBLPad, StarGraft, IceCC, MemGraft, DatEdit, FireFox, Trillian, StealthBot, VNC, Fraps, ATI Control Panel, ZoneAlarm and AVG Free running.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Cruzo on 2006-06-19 at 16:03:01
Umm...

+ 000h 01m 06.882s [ 1m]
Report, edit, etc...Posted by KaboomHahahein on 2006-06-19 at 16:07:15
You managed to calculate 1 million in 6.882s? That means, if it is true (which I don't think), you beat the world record by a lot. I'm going to post my results as soon as it's done calculating the 16million one.

16k: 0.437 seconds
1M: 56.703 seconds
16M: 22minutes 14.421 seconds
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Gigins on 2006-06-19 at 16:11:02
QUOTE(KaboomHahahein @ Jun 19 2006, 11:06 PM)
You managed to calculate 1 million in 6.882s? That means, if it is true (which I don't think), you beat the world record by a lot. I'm going to post my results as soon as it's done calculating the 16million one.
[right][snapback]509599[/snapback][/right]

Notice that 1 minute?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Cruzo on 2006-06-19 at 16:13:45
Kaboom, it's one minute.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by KaboomHahahein on 2006-06-19 at 16:22:47
My mistake :/ I thought I look at the wrong section.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by O)FaRTy1billion on 2006-06-19 at 18:14:54
54.203 seconds. Meh. I don't know how much having all my stuff running effects it.
My other computer would probably take days.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Cruzo on 2006-06-19 at 18:18:24
Wow... So far my computer is the slowest one here. I guess as long as it works fine for me, it works fine right?

I think I'm going to remove all the crap I don't even need now.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Killer_Kow(MM) on 2006-06-19 at 19:55:42
16k- 1.344s
32k- 1.671s
64k- 2.687s
512k- 20.984s
1m- 46.438s

Don't want to put the time into more than 1m...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mr.Camo on 2006-06-19 at 20:06:49
Here's the real question..

Why does my computer need to be fast at calculating pi?

It's 3.14.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by n2o-SiMpSoNs on 2006-06-19 at 20:14:23
QUOTE(Mr.Camo @ Jun 19 2006, 07:06 PM)
Here's the real question..

Why does my computer need to be fast at calculating pi?

It's 3.14.
[right][snapback]509766[/snapback][/right]

It is not 3.14 it is

PI=3.

1415926535 8979323846 2643383279 5028841971 6939937510
5820974944 5923078164 0628620899 8628034825 3421170679
8214808651 3282306647 0938446095 5058223172 5359408128
4811174502 8410270193 8521105559 6446229489 5493038196
4428810975 6659334461 2847564823 3786783165 2712019091
4564856692 3460348610 4543266482 1339360726 0249141273
7245870066 0631558817 4881520920 9628292540 9171536436
7892590360 0113305305 4882046652 1384146951 9415116094
3305727036 5759591953 0921861173 8193261179 3105118548
0744623799 6274956735 1885752724 8912279381 8301194912
9833673362 4406566430 8602139494 6395224737 1907021798
6094370277 0539217176 2931767523 8467481846 7669405132
0005681271 4526356082 7785771342 7577896091 7363717872
1468440901 2249534301 4654958537 1050792279 6892589235
4201995611 2129021960 8640344181 5981362977 4771309960
5187072113 4999999837 2978049951 0597317328 1609631859
5024459455 3469083026 4252230825 3344685035 2619311881
7101000313 7838752886 5875332083 8142061717 7669147303
5982534904 2875546873 1159562863 8823537875 9375195778
1857780532 1712268066 1300192787 6611195909 2164201989..............
Report, edit, etc...Posted by HackOrDie on 2006-06-20 at 06:44:31
1M - 18.42 seconds
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

intel pentium D 955 dual core 3ghz per core, 4mb total L2 cache
my mistake, 2 sticks of 1 gb high performance dual-channel RAM = 2gb in all
200gb western-digital caviar
XFX overclocked NVIDIA 512mb GeForce 7800GTX
VERY LOUD, VERY HOT, playing high-performance games = around 90 *C after an hour. Luckily minor system damage occured since I put a 18" fan right on top of it happy.gif lucky me tho it still gets pretty hot in games such as quake 4 or f.e.a.r. when played at max settings, 16x AA, 32x AF, 1920x1440(nearly 3 mega-pixels)... shall I put a 200" fan? lmao they need to focus more on the cooling.
my computer is very hot, i will retest when i restart it.
the only program i had running was zone-alarm free trial smile.gif
warning if you do this like me: the games can get VERY choppy at times, especially if your system is hot.
i will edit this when im done testing how far it goes till it crashes happy.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2006-06-20 at 13:40:05
My friend overclocked a 1.5GHz athlon 64 to 3.6GHz with liquid nitrogen cooling. Try some of that happy.gif

36.766 sec.

AMD Athlon 4000+ at 2.4 GHz and 2GB of RAM.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Golden-Fist on 2006-06-20 at 14:06:17
My computer has a care-o-meter. So when I tell it to find the first 10,000 numbers of Pi it tells me to f*ck off :(
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Killer_Kow(MM) on 2006-06-20 at 15:22:47
QUOTE(n2o-SiMpSoNs @ Jun 19 2006, 08:14 PM)
It is not 3.14 it is

PI=3.

1415926535 8979323846 2643383279 5028841971 6939937510
5820974944 5923078164 0628620899 8628034825 3421170679
8214808651 3282306647 0938446095 5058223172 5359408128
4811174502 8410270193 8521105559 6446229489 5493038196
4428810975 6659334461 2847564823 3786783165 2712019091
4564856692 3460348610 4543266482 1339360726 0249141273
7245870066 0631558817 4881520920 9628292540 9171536436
7892590360 0113305305 4882046652 1384146951 9415116094
3305727036 5759591953 0921861173 8193261179 3105118548
0744623799 6274956735 1885752724 8912279381 8301194912
9833673362 4406566430 8602139494 6395224737 1907021798
6094370277 0539217176 2931767523 8467481846 7669405132
0005681271 4526356082 7785771342 7577896091 7363717872
1468440901 2249534301 4654958537 1050792279 6892589235
4201995611 2129021960 8640344181 5981362977 4771309960
5187072113 4999999837 2978049951 0597317328 1609631859
5024459455 3469083026 4252230825 3344685035 2619311881
7101000313 7838752886 5875332083 8142061717 7669147303
5982534904 2875546873 1159562863 8823537875 9375195778
1857780532 1712268066 1300192787 6611195909 2164201989..............
[right][snapback]509779[/snapback][/right]


Or, you could've said "the circumference of a circle divided by its diameter" and not have spammed and wasted space...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2006-06-20 at 15:50:20
It's Null, there are no minerals. tongue.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Killer_Kow(MM) on 2006-06-20 at 16:00:12
Right. Oops?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by n2o-SiMpSoNs on 2006-06-20 at 16:19:18
QUOTE(Golden-Dood @ Jun 20 2006, 01:05 PM)
My computer has a care-o-meter. So when I tell it to find the first 10,000 numbers of Pi it tells me to f*ck off :(
[right][snapback]510088[/snapback][/right]

Thats wat my comp said when i started reading your post in my thread..
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Golden-Fist on 2006-06-20 at 16:47:37
QUOTE(Killer_Kow(MM) @ Jun 20 2006, 02:22 PM)
Or, you could've said "the circumference of a circle divided by its diameter" and not have spammed and wasted space...[right][snapback]510144[/snapback][/right]

You don't have to announce instructions, there is a report button. Just follow this process:
user posted image
user posted image
It's a sweet deal.
QUOTE(n2o-SiMpSoNs @ Jun 20 2006, 03:18 PM)
Thats wat my comp said when i started reading your post in my thread..[right][snapback]510204[/snapback][/right]

So it filters out fun?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Valug on 2006-06-20 at 18:41:43
[sub]1m 31.031s. Running a Pentium 4 2.40 GHz and 1.00GB of Ram.[/sub]
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Doodle77(MM) on 2006-06-20 at 21:13:11
this isnt dedicated:
Program : PiFast version 4.3 (fix 1), by Xavier Gourdon
Computation of 1000000 digits of Pi
Method used : Chudnovsky
Size of FFT : 32 K
Physical memory used : ~ 2100 K
Disk memory used : ~ 4.29 Meg
------------------------------------------------------------
Computation run information :

Start : Tue Jun 20 21:10:19 2006
End : Tue Jun 20 21:11:04 2006
Duration : 44.98 seconds
Celeron M @ 1.4ghz: 512mb ram.

Looks like i get high points.
16k

Computation of 16000 digits of Pi
Method used : Chudnovsky
Size of FFT : 2 K
Physical memory used : ~ 673 K
Disk memory used : ~ 0.00 Meg
------------------------------------------------------------
Computation run information :

Start : Tue Jun 20 21:16:46 2006
End : Tue Jun 20 21:16:46 2006
Duration : 0.03 seconds
============================================================
Total computation time : 0.03 seconds (~ 0.00 hours)
============================================================
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2006-06-21 at 05:09:53
16K: 241Milliseconds
1M: 48.141Seconds
2M: 2:12.214Minutes
32M: 1:01:41.854Hours
Using a p4 3200mhz and 1GB of good old ram
Report, edit, etc...Posted by n2o-SiMpSoNs on 2006-06-21 at 18:56:41
QUOTE(Killer_Kow(MM) @ Jun 20 2006, 02:22 PM)
Or, you could've said "the circumference of a circle divided by its diameter" and not have spammed and wasted space...
[right][snapback]510144[/snapback][/right]

why did you quote it if it's spam and wasted space?

ADDITION:
QUOTE(Golden-Dood @ Jun 20 2006, 03:47 PM)

So it filters out fun?
[right][snapback]510221[/snapback][/right]

If that is your idea of fun then yes.
Next Page (1)