Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2006-11-24 at 21:49:34
Are we still denying OSMAP if it's been submitted to the DLDB? And what sort of disciplinary actions are appropriate?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tuxedo Templar on 2006-11-24 at 22:14:38
Is this an invitation to reignite the OSMAP debate? I'd say no. Same points still hold now as they did before. The choice should belong to the map maker in the end. OSMAP editing isn't practical or recommendable anyway.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2006-11-24 at 22:25:03
No need to reignite that... debate... 
Just wondering, the policy has gotten... fuzzier... since the last time an unprotector was submitted.
Just wondering, the policy has gotten... fuzzier... since the last time an unprotector was submitted.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tuxedo Templar on 2006-11-24 at 22:44:31
I'll say only one thing, though: The only valid reason for OSMAP that isn't defeated by possible risks is recovering maps affected by the blizzard patch. But even still, that shouldn't be a job for general public anyway.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2006-11-24 at 23:16:57
To make things very plain and clear: No.
If they don't know about our policy, deny it and tell them about how we don't support unprotection.
If it's clearly malicious, tell me specifically.
If they don't know about our policy, deny it and tell them about how we don't support unprotection.
If it's clearly malicious, tell me specifically.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MillenniumArmy on 2006-11-24 at 23:23:25
Staredit.net does not support map unprotection. If you wish to get your hands on the program, get it somewhere else.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by CheeZe on 2006-11-25 at 00:14:42
Did you even read the posts above you?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MillenniumArmy on 2006-11-25 at 00:23:38
Um yea...?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mini Moose 2707 on 2006-11-25 at 02:20:32
It's called reinforcement, Cheeze. This is an issue that could use it. No OSMAP.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by CaptainWill on 2006-11-25 at 11:19:38
Yeah - policy is against it so we can't accept it, and I guess that's the bottom line
The debate will rear its ugly head again some time, I'm sure.
The debate will rear its ugly head again some time, I'm sure.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by CheeZe on 2006-11-25 at 13:08:34
QUOTE(Mini Moose 2707 @ Nov 25 2006, 02:20 AM)
It's called reinforcement, Cheeze. This is an issue that could use it. No OSMAP.
[right][snapback]594493[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]594493[/snapback][/right]
I just realized something. I misread.
I read it as OSMAP maps.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Merrell on 2006-11-26 at 00:03:42
I baleted it earlier with the comment: "We don't allow unprotectors."
Report, edit, etc...Posted by PCFredZ on 2006-11-26 at 02:04:44
Delete the file and pretend it was never there, the submitter looks like a newbie. 
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Moogle on 2006-11-26 at 06:27:53
. . . Submits file 100 times . . .
LoL, ye very well. Has been said in news before by moose that we dont support OSMAP, so may as well stick by ya guns and not let it in. Plus alot of uproar has happened since release of it, sigh. Just delete file and be done with it.
LoL, ye very well. Has been said in news before by moose that we dont support OSMAP, so may as well stick by ya guns and not let it in. Plus alot of uproar has happened since release of it, sigh. Just delete file and be done with it.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Merrell on 2006-11-26 at 11:38:15
Yeah. Nice to see everyone read my post.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mini Moose 2707 on 2006-11-26 at 13:26:51
Who's this Merrell guy?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by KaboomHahahein on 2006-11-27 at 21:42:01
MrrLL = new staff?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by PCFredZ on 2006-11-28 at 18:09:55
MrrLL = new member? 
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Merrell on 2006-11-28 at 19:00:21
The cool guy submitted it again. No more DLDB access for him >=).
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Syphon on 2006-11-28 at 19:30:02
MrrLL = new power abuse?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Yenku on 2006-11-29 at 17:19:19
I don't even see why one would consider allowing it after already deciding not to. Its obviously unethical. If people protect thier maps, they don't want others in it, if they don't then they should expect/allow others fooling with it.
I, personally, think its a good idea, there are plenty of ways to learn how to do certain things (I am assuming thats the argument on why to accept it) and most unprotecting isn't for useful causes anyway.
I, personally, think its a good idea, there are plenty of ways to learn how to do certain things (I am assuming thats the argument on why to accept it) and most unprotecting isn't for useful causes anyway.