QUOTE(Mp)7-7 @ Dec 6 2006, 02:16 PM)
Because we are planning on getting the clan back together. And a couple people have put a lot of effort that would just be waisted. Geting rid of this would seal the deak for the clan and we would be done.
[right][snapback]600388[/snapback][/right]
What does putting the clan back together have to do with SEN, though? The major question here is whether or not Mp is suitable to have a SEN forum right now, while they're on the verge of death (unless there's some other meaning for "seal the deal for the clan and we would be done." Worry about your clan first, SEN second. If the life of Mp) is hanging on a thread and SEN is the only thing keeping that thread from snapping, then Mp) is in serious trouble.
You guys could always make your own forum, outside of SEN. And that's why Moose started this discussion. Everything that has happened to Mp recently has stayed in this forum and/or negatively effected SEN. Because it seems like you guys aren't trying to branch out and help the community at the moment (which is understandable when you're too preoccupied with rebuilding your clan), this forum seems like a waste of space plagued by resignations and ideas. All of that could be in your own forum elsewhere. Again, is it that necessary that Mp) is at SEN
right now?
QUOTE(Mp)MinigameEast @ Dec 6 2006, 03:36 PM)
its not the clan that makes the drama. its a coincidence that people leave for no reason, there clan hoppers, attention horrors, pretty much those people dont do worth crap with the clan except cause more drama than it is.
this has to be what?...... the third time we had this problem, and now you seem to care.
anyone can make up a random starcraft clan, its just the members can be excellent or major mean persons. and this third time we had major mean persons.
[right][snapback]600426[/snapback][/right]
Well then that should tell you something. If a clan has major issues with choosing "major mean persons" and people constantly quitting, then that's an issue with the clan. You can't blame that fault on a simple
recurring "coincidence."