Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> UMS Showcase -> Whaddia think?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by phlemhacker99 on 2004-11-03 at 22:16:09
This is a melee map thats fast with plenty of room.What do you think?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by CheeZe on 2004-11-03 at 22:18:18
Terrible.

-It's fastest possible

-It's stupid

-Wtf
Report, edit, etc...Posted by phlemhacker99 on 2004-11-03 at 22:34:24
Fine. Some people like fast maps.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by IDontChat on 2004-11-04 at 00:33:45
How's about some thoughts from a person who doesn't hate money maps like the plague. First of all, the bottom right corner's minerals aren't properly stacked. My mineral income is really slow and the shadow isn't pitch black. Luckily, the other corners are fine. The square terrain is something neat I don't see in the maps I play. Its usage isn't too shabby if I say so myself. Anyways, there is a LOT more room to build on because there's only 4 players as opposed to Fastest Possible's 8 players. 2 times more room to build on for each player. So basically, you made a pretty decent fastest map. I tend to overrate or underrate things a lot so I may be overrating this. sad.gif

SUMMARY:
Pros:-Fastest map (for some people)
-Unique (at least in my map folder)
Cons:-The bottom right corner's minerals
-Fastest map (for some people)
Overall:Not too shabby

Before somebody goes and tells me that I am an idiot for liking a fastest map, I would like to say "I don't LOVE fastest maps, just LIKE them as I do UMS maps."

The following was a message brought to you by Ed.
EDIT:added "overall" and this
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Paella on 2004-11-04 at 05:53:04
Well I used to play fastest when I was a n00blar and let me tell you: the maps are fun to play, especially iff you have no resource management skills. As for making the actuall map, don't do this because people are already addicted to their own fastest maps, and it just makes more downloads for us all.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DISTURBED on 2004-11-04 at 12:29:47
It's not bad, but not to good. But still a map none-the less. Mistakes/Bad maps are a sign NORMALLY a sign to improovment. Keep up the work.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by phlemhacker99 on 2004-11-04 at 12:51:03
QUOTE(Ed331 @ Nov 4 2004, 12:33 AM)
How's about some thoughts from a person who doesn't hate money maps like the plague. First of all, the bottom right corner's minerals aren't properly stacked. My mineral income is really slow and the shadow isn't pitch black. Luckily, the other corners are fine. The square terrain is something neat I don't see in the maps I play. Its usage isn't too shabby if I say so myself. Anyways, there is a LOT more room to build on because there's only 4 players as opposed to Fastest Possible's 8 players. 2 times more room to build on for each player. So basically, you made a pretty decent fastest map. I tend to overrate or underrate things a lot so I may be overrating this. sad.gif

SUMMARY:
Pros:-Fastest map (for some people)
        -Unique (at least in my map folder)
Cons:-The bottom right corner's minerals
        -Fastest map (for some people)
Overall:Not too shabby

Before somebody goes and tells me that I am an idiot for liking a fastest map, I would like to say "I don't LOVE fastest maps, just LIKE them as I do UMS maps."

The following was a message brought to you by Ed.
EDIT:added "overall" and this
[right][snapback]94325[/snapback][/right]




I'll try to fix the corner.[/color=red]
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Paella on 2004-11-04 at 15:12:43
Make sure that if you are terran you can always add on to your command centers, even if they are near the end of the map.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by .Coko[CK] on 2004-11-04 at 15:19:06
That is an important feature most ppl seem to miss, though i've sadly not played these maps for some years now...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Paella on 2004-11-04 at 15:23:10
Coko, I have not played them in a long time either, but that was always the thing that found a way to piss me off everygame.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Robi on 2004-11-04 at 15:30:54
just explaining why , for me, fastest maps are for "produce & kill" people who arn't strategical.... for me, if the game is fun and good, it's not the BIG FIGHT between two army, but HOW you kill your adverse and HOW he reacts and .... and ....
i just think it's funnier and more interesting.

I sugest for noobs to train on good melee maps like Lost Temple with other same noobs with same level ....
Report, edit, etc...Posted by phlemhacker99 on 2004-11-04 at 20:16:42
There is strateegy just a different kind.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by CheeZe on 2004-11-04 at 20:36:15
Sort of off topic but can someone explain to me exactly HOW Fastest Possible is a good map? The only way you think it's good is if you have NEVER (or forgot how to play) played non fastest. I would know, I suffered from 2 years of fastest possible, played a couple games on Lost Temple and was hooked.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by .Coko[CK] on 2004-11-05 at 05:52:17
Different style of game; because its Macro Intensive, and faster start, most people prefer it.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by phlemhacker99 on 2004-11-05 at 12:34:44
Also keeps you on your feet more because it is fast.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by .Coko[CK] on 2004-11-05 at 14:15:07
You'd be much more suprised about the speeds of Real Starcraft, when you have good players.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by phlemhacker99 on 2004-11-06 at 14:53:46
Yea there are some real fast players
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheOddAngel on 2004-11-06 at 15:37:33
Seriously if you want to beat me in real starcraft ( thats all i will ever play)

All you need to de is get zerglings asap and ill lose...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by .Coko[CK] on 2004-11-06 at 17:14:12
Well; i was on the way to winning that Melee tourny i tell you!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheOddAngel on 2004-11-07 at 09:54:50
SO was I...

I got mins form jsut playing the match...

I dont knwo... where did phatdidy go?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Lisk on 2004-11-07 at 10:39:14
fastest maps are just very fast if you play vs a decent opponent.
its rather hard to mass build and micro at the same time.
most ppl just forget that you CAN micro and macro in a fastest map.
thats why I win. I just outmicro my opponents smile.gif
cheese > all tongue.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by .Coko[CK] on 2004-11-07 at 15:46:19
The way to win that map is either rush with Zealot, or attack with Hydra/Defiler and destroy them...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by phlemhacker99 on 2004-11-07 at 23:03:05
It also depends on if it is no rush.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by CheeZe on 2004-11-07 at 23:16:41
QUOTE(Lisk @ Nov 7 2004, 10:39 AM)
fastest maps are just very fast if you play vs a decent opponent.
its rather hard to mass build and micro at the same time.
most ppl just forget that you CAN micro and macro in a fastest map.
thats why I win.  I just outmicro my opponents smile.gif
cheese > all tongue.gif
[right][snapback]95749[/snapback][/right]


That better not be a joke.

Here you go. Fastest Suck. No exceptions. None. Absolutly None.
Beating someone on fastest shows no skill. People who play on that map turtle too much.

You have no understanding of containment nor expansion.
You don't know what using every unit to it's maximum potential means since everything is replacable.
You rush instead of harass.
You build huge ships thinking it's cool.
You have no understanding to why defilers are good.
You don't know how to use dark templars correctly.
You think spell casters suck.

I think that sums it up.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by .Coko[CK] on 2004-11-08 at 09:24:11
Forgot to add the fact that they don't know how to Macro and can't hotkey and create / while attacking at once.
Next Page (1)