Report, edit, etc...Posted by (Dual)Archon on 2005-01-15 at 00:39:58
lol i was just interested
Report, edit, etc...Posted by brutetal on 2005-01-15 at 00:45:14
ALL THE ABOVE!!!!
But really I most like is wow n wc3, but wc3 ft even more.
1.wow has a fee, i hate fees...
2.wc3 is good but doesnt have the stuff that ft has
3.ft has more stuff then wc3
But really I most like is wow n wc3, but wc3 ft even more.
1.wow has a fee, i hate fees...
2.wc3 is good but doesnt have the stuff that ft has
3.ft has more stuff then wc3
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tazzy on 2005-01-15 at 08:54:24
I like all of the warcrafts, I really think it is a good game. I love warcraft 3 aswell. But i sadly think they should have kept it just Orcs and humans, Maybe one other race fall in. But thats about it. As in the trialer for it, i was misleaded by it. You had an orc and human fighting, Then a Fire lord (golem i think) Fall from the sky and next sceen you see the orc and human stop fighting look at each other, Then blackness, next sceen the orc and human hands are side by side, and the body to be found nowhere. Its good but does not feel like warcraft 3. 
Report, edit, etc...Posted by PearS on 2005-01-15 at 13:51:07
Warcraft Three is the best RTS game EVER!!! I hope Blizzard does SC2 like they did WC3.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Sipher on 2005-01-15 at 17:47:03
Im not much of a WC fan so I voted "I hate warcraft". But I do like it in some ways. I guess I am just an SC kinda guy 
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-01-15 at 17:52:21
Warcraft was a great rts! If Warcraft didn't get great sales then SC would't be here! I love WC1,WC2 and WC3 I have't play WOW I might buy it and pay fees.
Mostly it would be WC3 cuz it improved SO MUCH with its rpg elements,shops,items,night and day and alot of a hellva more! I was crazy!
But the thing that kind of went off in wC3 is the map editor cuz if you are use to WC2 editor and SC Editor I bet you won't get use to WC3 Editor but it very Advance editor
Mostly it would be WC3 cuz it improved SO MUCH with its rpg elements,shops,items,night and day and alot of a hellva more! I was crazy!
But the thing that kind of went off in wC3 is the map editor cuz if you are use to WC2 editor and SC Editor I bet you won't get use to WC3 Editor but it very Advance editor
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Revelade on 2005-01-15 at 17:54:55
QUOTE(PearS @ Jan 15 2005, 01:51 PM)
Warcraft Three is the best RTS game EVER!!! I hope Blizzard does SC2 like they did WC3.
[right][snapback]125864[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]125864[/snapback][/right]
I really do hope they DON'T make SC2 like WC3.
I'd prefer simpler unit designs. Why? Well, for instance, it can run on more computers, which is definitely a good thing. Next, you can have supplies of 200 while WC3 is limited to 100. Maps are faster to download, and when playing online games, lag is generally better.
In SC, what made the game great was that it revolved around unit types, and countering. Losses were expected on both sides, since gameplay was so fast. In WC3, the game focuses on heroes too much. Suddenly, 1 hero can own a bunch of units. If you have no heroes, you are screwed, can't say it simpler than that.
The map editor has turned many would-be mappers away since it makes Staredit look like legos. I'd prefer a more user-friendly application. Something very similar to Staredit, yet we could have more options such as create-a-unit, and possibly more triggers. What made Staredit great was it's easy to use interface and the fact that it had potential to be more powerful. Personally, I'd like maps that use mp3s or MIDIs instead of the o-so-fat wavs.
Basically:
- Focus on strategy, not heroes
- Keep editor user-friendly, yet powerful
- Learn from WC3 (use mp3s or MIDIs, NOT wavs for maps/create-a-unit/more triggers/12 or more players)
- Larger battles (200+ max supply)
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-01-15 at 17:59:14
QUOTE(Revelade @ Jan 15 2005, 05:54 PM)
I really do hope they DON'T make SC2 like WC3.
I'd prefer simpler unit designs. Why? Well, for instance, it can run on more computers, which is definitely a good thing. Next, you can have supplies of 200 while WC3 is limited to 100. Maps are faster to download, and when playing online games, lag is generally better.
In SC, what made the game great was that it revolved around unit types, and countering. Losses were expected on both sides, since gameplay was so fast. In WC3, the game focuses on heroes too much. Suddenly, 1 hero can own a bunch of units. If you have no heroes, you are screwed, can't say it simpler than that.
The map editor has turned many would-be mappers away since it makes Staredit look like legos. I'd prefer a more user-friendly application. Something very similar to Staredit, yet we could have more options such as create-a-unit, and possibly more triggers. What made Staredit great was it's easy to use interface and the fact that it had potential to be more powerful. Personally, I'd like maps that use mp3s or MIDIs instead of the o-so-fat wavs.
Basically:
- Focus on strategy, not heroes
- Keep editor user-friendly, yet powerful
- Learn from WC3 (use mp3s or MIDIs, NOT wavs for maps/create-a-unit/more triggers/12 or more players)
- Larger battles (200+ max supply)
[right][snapback]125999[/snapback][/right]
I'd prefer simpler unit designs. Why? Well, for instance, it can run on more computers, which is definitely a good thing. Next, you can have supplies of 200 while WC3 is limited to 100. Maps are faster to download, and when playing online games, lag is generally better.
In SC, what made the game great was that it revolved around unit types, and countering. Losses were expected on both sides, since gameplay was so fast. In WC3, the game focuses on heroes too much. Suddenly, 1 hero can own a bunch of units. If you have no heroes, you are screwed, can't say it simpler than that.
The map editor has turned many would-be mappers away since it makes Staredit look like legos. I'd prefer a more user-friendly application. Something very similar to Staredit, yet we could have more options such as create-a-unit, and possibly more triggers. What made Staredit great was it's easy to use interface and the fact that it had potential to be more powerful. Personally, I'd like maps that use mp3s or MIDIs instead of the o-so-fat wavs.
Basically:
- Focus on strategy, not heroes
- Keep editor user-friendly, yet powerful
- Learn from WC3 (use mp3s or MIDIs, NOT wavs for maps/create-a-unit/more triggers/12 or more players)
- Larger battles (200+ max supply)
[right][snapback]125999[/snapback][/right]
Hmmm Thats true... But for SC2 thry should
- Add new Things like Ammo System for some units
- Max Units
- New units
- Better eidtor (not so confusing)
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Chill on 2005-01-18 at 22:53:40
Don't care.