QUOTE(M.Army)
I've seen many people's reasonings for why they dont believe in God. Most of them i can see/understand why they take that stance. But there's one which i just cannot particularly understand. It's the one where people say "I wont believe God exists until i see him" and say that's their only reason.
We could use that analogy for just about... anything. By using this, we can conclude that George Washington, the creator/founder of the United States of America, never existed. There's no visual proof that he existed; letters and books that say he existed don't mean he exist. So basically in order to believe that george washington ever existed, we have to see him visually.
But then of course, there are many other different ways of interpreting this...
Not this thing fetched back again...
*Rolls eyes* so you would believe in my
invisible pet dragon without a shred of doubt!?!

My guess is that those folks want a gullible logic explantion to be drawn from it, that can be concluded/proven of God's/higher whatever's existance.
My posture through this one is simple... sorta. There could be a higher entity or not, but 'till proven I'll take my chances with a logic and/or Science PoV's backbone.
Side note: Religion imo it's like football, everyone chooses the 'team' that fancies (aka identifies) the most.
*Smirks... kinda* 
QUOTE(M.Army)
Actually i meant "... It's the one where people say 'I wont believe God exists until i see him myself' and..." That's what they mean actually.
The "see" up there is in italic why, may I ask (aka it isn't in the literal sense, is it)? Now you're a mind reader... this sure widens my perspective.

On a serious note, though. Perhaps they want to see the proof(s) to evaluate it for themselves and not based on what other ppl tells'em.
*Meh* 
QUOTE(Tux' Templar)
Religion as I see it is a tool. People hate functioning in uncertainty, and even go as far as to make up superstitions and imaginary rules and taboos just to have some system to function by. Without it, they feel naked. There's a quote that says "There's no athiests on the battlefield.", or something to that effect. When people are forced into situations they have no control over, and must make decisions that go beyond their primal drives, it helps to have something "greater" to fall back on.
That's what religion is for. Instead of letting people make up their own arbitrary superstitions and taboos, organized religions have been formed in all major societies as a standardized system of superstitions/taboos for people to go by in mass to help them function in daily life.
I shudder to think were we'd be without it. Though at the same time, in this day and age, I wish people would come up with something better. Looking at it from a distance, it just seems to me to be a little bit silly, IMO.
Agreed thoroughly.

Thus my comment on why what's considered 'normal' is highly overestimated.
QUOTE(Rantent)
Religion to me, began simply as a sort of charm that people made to help them through times of stress. This mixed with ideals of how life should be lived is what most religions achieve. After leaders developed in society, (way back when) they spread their ideals to the other people who were under them. Basically this continued on, and while you moved from one area to another, you adopted the beliefs of the area's ruler. Then Abraham came up with the defiant idea that his god came with him where he went. Many other great minds helped mold todays religions. Zoroaster for instance invented the so readily accepted idea of good/evil. These radical veiws along with cultural beliefs, have shaped what are most religions today.
I believe that a person should not have to rely on a greater power to accomplish great things, I have the idea that you should believe in yourself. (sounds kinda cheesy, I know)
From this one I can infere that you're Atheist or by other option (read Agnostic). Am I right?
