Staredit Network

Good point. Kill, You talking back at the kid is no different then him telling you his beliefs, except you kinda bashed him. Well, then again...I think he bashed your belief as well, then again, so does every belief. Christians indirectly bash islam by not believing in them, and vice versa. So I think that kid indirectly bashed you, while you however, directly bashed him. But you seem to have misunderstood, and/or acted in self defence of your ideology. Which explains why you directly bashed him. So I guess it's all fair in the end.

I'd expect most people here to be teens...

Most people here are teens age wise, but still act like little toddlers

like me

Do you think about what you say before you write it? becuase no effence but the above quote comes from one of your posts and it contradicts its self so, before you blame others for things please look back at your self, otherwise you might be in danger of being hypocritical....

I don't see how it is contradicting, how do you see so? I am saying that he has no right to try to force things on us. I never said he didn't have the free will to do so.

He never tried to force his beliefs on you. He just shared a part of them very breifly. Reread mill's reply.

Well I know that. It's just that Rhiom was trying to say that I contradicted myself. What I said in that post doesn't sound contradicting to me. Does it to you? Listen to Rhiom's reply:

"Do you think about what you say before you write it? becuase no effence but the above quote comes from one of your posts and it contradicts its self so, before you blame others for things please look back at your self, otherwise you might be in danger of being hypocritical...."

If you read the quotes he posted of me, there is no hypocracy in them, well, from at least what I can see.

lol, because you complained that he shared his own beliefs but then you freely share your own in almost exactly the same manner, thats how it's contradictory.

Addition: I mean i'm dyslexic and i can read how you were hypocritical.

Dude, why are you putting words in my mouth? I don't freely going around stressing my religion to everyone (which is no religion at all because I believe that religion is fake) I just say that I don't believe in "God". I don't flaunt it around like half the people in this thread. Enless you think that saying my "religion" over and over in a post, trying to get my point across is flaunting...

God didn't have a beginning. Nothing created him, because whatever has a beginning has to have a cause. Maybe God lies outside of time...?

We never said, (At least I never said) that you do this all the time. You just did it once, big deal. Everyone has done it time to time.

Actually, God did have a begining. I heard that Pangea (The one mass land) when put together, has a big circle missing from it. It is possible, that that one mass that is missing, was "Lifted into the Heavens" by "God"

If you think about it, every city in ancient times were never square, like today. They were always circular.

Just a thought.

putting words in your mouth???? i quoted you. i dont need to put words in your mouth, your words speak for themselves.

anyone else with me on this one?



what are you talking about? that was vague, please explain more.

Why can't the big bang lie outside or time, or something else, but not a god?

So the big bang shouldn't be believed because it at least tries to go along with the laws of physics while your belief in god can just say he had no beginning and he just was.

classicly i think the big bang is suppose to represent the beginning of time... whihc is kinda a weird thought sense shoudlnt there be something before? lol, maybe it is outside time? or is time?

Read the below quote:



You are putting words in my mouth, cause I never complained about him sharing his beliefs! I was complaining of how he is trying to say we are all going to hell (see Christianity thread for more of his ignorance) for not believeing in "God" And like I clearely stated before, I don't go around flaunting my religion in other peoples faces like him!

So how in the hell am I being hypocritical by stating that he has no right to flaunt his religion in my face? If anyone is being hypocritical, it is you. By your above statement:
"Addition: I mean i'm dyslexic and i can read how you were hypocritical."

That proves, that you are being the hypocritical one. Being dyslexic does not mean you can read hypocracy you jackass. It only proves your ignorance towards this subject more than Neiji's.

Addition:


Anyone who knows their history knows that scientists believe that the world was one. That is what "Pangea" is supposed to mean. Now, if we were to take all the land masses and put them together, there will be a big circular part missing from it. It is supposed to be connected to North America, where the Gulf of Mexico is.
Now like I stated earlier, in ancient times, all cities were build in a spherical form, to protect themselves from enemies (Cause if it was square, it would be to easy for the enemy to break in. That is why on the movie "Troy" the city of Troy has the circular shape. Them damn Trojans are geneiouses, however you spell that) And if you look at a map of the US, the Gulf of Mexico, is in fact a spherical shape.

I was just trying to get some replies on that.

It doesn't prove he's hypocritical.

In addition go to link in my sig

If you check when I joined, you will clearly see, I am not a newb. I just stopped posting a long time ago, cause I stopped playing SC.

Oh then you are a noob

It doesn't matter when you joined, overall you just haven't been as active yet you are not just arguing you are fighting with everyone.

Me? You're the one that is fighting with everyone. At least I can admit when I am wrong, you.... You can't. You always have to be right. And if someone proves you wrong, you flame them. I have seen it throughout your posts.

And I am not trying to cause trouble. You, are the one trying to cause the trouble because you are always flamming people for no reason. You flamed me by calling me a "noob" (not a gigantic flame, but still a flame) I try to discuss my side of the spectrum, and i get flammed for it. How pathetic is that?

I hate how everyone always concieves God as a "Him."

Admit I'm wrong? About what? Theres nothing to be wrong about here at least in this discussion.'



I haven't been proven wrong, and even when I am I don't flame. Its the other way around.

God can't be a woman. God has to be a man, I mean, if god was a woman, how in the hell would there be beef jerkey? Honestly.

I don't get it. Are you trying to imply that women can't make good beef jerky?

EDIT: And we can't call God a women either, since God is undescribable, either that or he doesn't exist.

God is referred to him because that is the best personal pronoun, I mean who would want to refer to god as an "it" thats just awkward.