Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> Serious Discussion -> When will someone do something!?!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Merrell on 2005-07-19 at 17:39:09
QUOTE(Parthx86 @ Jul 18 2005, 11:38 PM)
Disconnect Hack: Haha, have you ever seen someone join with a record like 53-2-65? They suck. It just makes it that much easier to kick their  censored.gif  because you don't even have to destroy their whole base. One time I even had a guy threaten to disconnect himself if his ally didn't ally. Well, we killed him and right before his nexus exploded, whats this? "Waiting for players:". >.<
[right][snapback]265307[/snapback][/right]


Hey, me and Deathknight have over 150 disconnects from testing glitches (especially the powerup glitch) and we never use any hacks.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Pineapple on 2005-07-19 at 17:42:45
The people on starcraft using the hack's, Aren't considered hackers, There considered people that use other people's hacks. The people that make the hack's, Are called hackers.

Not only the people making hacks for starcraft, What about the hackers going into other people's PC's? And stealing all of there credit information, And evreything that the person has worked on, Or just get back at revenge and crash there computer, Or just do it for the amusement.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Merrell on 2005-07-19 at 17:51:50
Thats not true. Everybody has their definitions of hackers, and on Battle.net those are people using the hacks. I mean according to Deathknights thread of the true definition, we would all be hackers but we don't really call eachother hackers.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Pineapple on 2005-07-19 at 17:55:47
Well, My term of hacking is the person hacking the game, Not the person using the program to hack the game.

A programmer who breaks into computer systems in order to steal or change or destroy information as a form of cyber-terrorism or A programmer for whom computing is its own reward; may enjoy the challenge of breaking into other computers but does no harm; "true hackers subscribe to a code of ethics and look down upon crackers"
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-07-20 at 00:28:17
QUOTE(Zero @ Jul 19 2005, 02:42 PM)
The people on starcraft using the hack's, Aren't considered hackers, There considered people that use other people's hacks. The people that make the hack's, Are called hackers.

Not only the people making hacks for starcraft, What about the hackers going into other people's PC's? And stealing all of there credit information, And evreything that the person has worked on, Or just get back at revenge and crash there computer, Or just do it for the amusement.
[right][snapback]265757[/snapback][/right]


Uhhh.... That's why you don't store that info on your comp (A duh?)

QUOTE(Zero @ Jul 19 2005, 02:55 PM)
Well, My term of hacking is the person hacking the game, Not the person using the program to hack the game.

A programmer who breaks into computer systems in order to steal or change or destroy information as a form of cyber-terrorism or A programmer for whom computing is its own reward; may enjoy the challenge of breaking into other computers but does no harm; "true hackers subscribe to a code of ethics and look down upon crackers"
[right][snapback]265775[/snapback][/right]


Someone who breaks into computer systems and steals or changes or even destroys stuff is known as a Cracker. Those are the ones that Crack through encryptions and poo.gif .

And it's good to have Hackers working for you. Microsoft hires them all the time.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Pineapple on 2005-07-20 at 01:56:26
QUOTE
Uhhh.... That's why you don't store that info on your comp (A duh?)

Well, People new to computer's don't know what the hell hacker's are, And they think it is easier to store information, Instead of saving piles of papers in your house, And end up loseing a paper.

QUOTE
Someone who breaks into computer systems and steals or changes or even destroys stuff is known as a Cracker. Those are the ones that Crack through encryptions.

Actually, Cracker's are only known for breaking password's, So that they know the password, Or figuring out secruity codes to something.

So, Someone breaking into your computer is defined as a hacker.

No wounder on Firewall softwear, It doesn't say "Keep crackers out of your computer!"

It sais, "Keep hackers out of your computer!"
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Parthx86 on 2005-07-20 at 04:37:17
QUOTE
Well, People new to computer's don't know what the hell hacker's are, And they think it is easier to store information, Instead of saving piles of papers in your house, And end up loseing a paper.

My dad sucks with computers, but that doesn't mean he stores all his junk on this. He's still smart, just not with computers, so he knows not to trust technology! biggrin.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Pineapple on 2005-07-20 at 15:29:57
95% of high ranked company's, Strore all of their information on computer's, Imagine how many papers they would have laying around, When they can store them all on one single computer...

No wounder company's have strong firewalls.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by SpaceBoy2000 on 2005-07-21 at 01:33:30
Look, all hacker have to do is go around and dump keyloggers into people's computers. Then, even if you DON'T store things like credit card number, if you do some transaction online (buying new hardware, doing something with Paypal, etc), hackers can still get at you.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MillenniumArmy on 2005-07-21 at 01:46:02
Blizzard ain't really going to do anything about it.

I think they find it pointless, because whatever they do, the idiots out there will always find ways around it.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Parthx86 on 2005-07-21 at 02:23:34
The can't really be considered idiots if they're smart enough to keep up with Blizzard, unless you're speaking of the Blizzard employees working on Diablo. They're just a bunch of apes being paid $2 an hour. Have you SEEN how many d2 hacks there are? Nobody is legit on that game.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Dr.Shotgun on 2005-07-24 at 10:42:29
Its worse because Diablo is an RPG.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by www.com.au on 2005-08-09 at 04:18:32
what i was stating is that inhale was rare at the time of my posting for a version that works on 1.13
Report, edit, etc...Posted by offensivestyle on 2005-08-10 at 07:14:14
Ok, first of all, you need to know that making a hack is easier than making a "counter-hack" and in every game there are hacks, and if you trie to be an honest player, at the end, you mostly have the advantages, because if Blizzard find's a way of putting some bots that finds out whats happening in every game the hakers may get screwed and can't lpay anymore because they only relied on hacks to play and since you played honestly, you're way better than them (unless you really suck at it and still dont know what the hell is a Tank).

So just let the hakers hack, its only a game (not that i'm saying that winning isin't important but not THAT important). So let them be what they want to be: A fagg*t.
And when a new patch comes out, it usually takes 2 days for the hack to spread around. Trust me, I play R.O.S.E Online, World of Warcraft, Conquer Online, Gunbound and Neopets. I know how to make bots for World of Warcraft and Gunbound, its incredibly easy, just type in 40 lines and its done. But you have to have the pixel number for the monster you have to kill.



Ok, in World of Warcraft, ROSE Online, Gunbound and GuildWars, its easy to counter bot hacks, because for those hacks, you're character has to
"aim" a target and that target is a pixel from the monster that other monsters dont have, they have numbers and you will have to find them. So if Blizzard/GBT/GuildWar team/ROSE team patches the game and changes the monster's appearance it would affect alot in the hacking communities, so I think they should release new patches every month, not like creating one every time but like, put patch #1 this month, then put patch#2 next month, then re-put patch#1 and then change to patch #3 next month. Ok, I admit users will be pissed of about DLing it all teh time but I think it would be way fairer. And of course, every patch has different monster appearances.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathknight on 2005-08-10 at 18:18:30
There's no such thing as a "freeze byte", that was patched. It's called a "drop hack", which allows you to drop any player from the game instantly, caused by sending certain packets to certain players.

QUOTE
I heard of an anti-hack that makes hackers turn against their own men, but it does not work in the most recent hacks.

No, nothing like this ever existed. But there was something that made players using one SPECIFIC hack, that was trojenned by the actual hackers who made it, unally themselves(It would send a message recognized as some kind of code, giving the hack instructions on what to do). The hackers trojenned this map hack because they knew it would be popular, and if they were on Battle.net, they could use their private hacks to basically do anything impossible in the game because the hack would be run on more than one person's computer.
Think of the hack being a TV. The private hack would be the remote control. However, a different remote can also be used on the same device. That's how the "anti-hack" in penguin plug was made.

I'm not worried about many of the things listed, except for the creation exploit and map hack. The creation exploit is issued the same way the morph exploit was issued, but using a different command. Blizzard failed to patch this when they patched the morph exploit. There are various other similar exploits, but they mostly crash the game. It would be an easy fix for Blizzard though.

Map hacks would be the hardest for Blizzard to patch. Map hacks exist even for Warcraft III and Diablo II.

I am annoyed by the colours used in games. Blizzard might be able to disable them in games like they did in the channels, but I don't know what kind of an effect it will have on Display Text. But I'd still like them to patch it, even if colours don't work anymore.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by offensivestyle on 2005-08-12 at 08:01:49
QUOTE
Map hacks would be the hardest for Blizzard to patch. Map hacks exist even for Warcraft III and Diablo II.



Uhhh, every single game that can have a map hack has a map hack blink.gif Not onlt WC3 and D2
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Altercation on 2005-08-15 at 20:11:50
It is possible to stop maphacking. Here are the steps:
1) Make a new patch
2) Kill everyone who makes hacks
Report, edit, etc...Posted by www.com.au on 2005-08-15 at 21:16:08
QUOTE(Zero @ Jul 21 2005, 06:29 AM)
95% of high ranked company's, Strore all of their information on computer's, Imagine how many papers they would have laying around, When they can store them all on one single computer...

No wounder company's have strong firewalls.
[right][snapback]266428[/snapback][/right]


thats not exactly entirely true

most of the larger companies keep about 8 copies of thier information. Some being on discreet passworded websites (yes, it would have firewalls and shiz..)

on a super computer kinda thing. (you know like the movies where theres all these lasers and vaults and security? well like that but not as hi-tech.)
Report, edit, etc...Posted by eom[Dark_Lord] on 2005-08-17 at 09:05:18
God getting your stats up to anynumber is very easy even though i don't mess with it i have seen it in action it is a spoofing bot evey 30 secs this guy's stats went up, and he was just talking in a channel. God if you think that map hack is bad take a look at diablo, even i have to admit diblo has so many hacks its sick even though Blizzard in a way countered it so if the host's do not have a hacked item the hacked person cannot eneter but new things are being made every day god knows what other hacks they could/might come up with sly.gif with anygame even Counter Strike can be hacked...
Next Page (2)