QUOTE(Morpheus)
Here's the simplest explaination: WE DON'T KNOW.
That's not an explanation. That's also one of the principals of Occam's Razor - do not add entities that do not have the facts to support it.
QUOTE
Just as there's no evidence that God exists, there's no evidence that He DOESN'T exist either
But to believe in something because it hasn't been shown to be false is logically fallacious. It would be an argument from ignorance and shifting the burden of proof on yourself at best.
Maybe there are vampires, there isn't any proof they don't exist. Maybe the entire world was just created five minutes ago with even our memories of "earlier" events intact, it's never been falsified, so should we believe or disbeleve? It would be more rational to assume false until shown otherwise.
"So, how do we deal with heretofore unknown, but suspicious and possibly false claims? The answer is that a fine line between naiveté and dogmatism must be walked by every critical thinker. On the one hand, sheer insanity awaits if we remain undecided on every bizarre yet conveniently unfalsifiable claim we come across:
- Leprechauns? Well, they might exist, so it would be sheer folly not to follow a rainbow for a free chance at $$$.
- Garden demons? You better not go outside in the dark, just in case.
- Deities that desire your attention and will roast you on a paranormal spit rack if you don't give them any? Well, it couldn't hurt to burn a goat in their favor once in awhile.
- Ghosts that might spontaneously combust your innards if you get up at any time evenly divisible by 2 minutes? Well, no one can prove those false, so let's keep an open mind... and take painstaking care not to go to the restroom at the wrong moment.
On the other hand, some claims that ran counter to initial expectations and common sense have, indeed, been borne out. Assuming something is logically possible, meaning it isn't internally contradictory, where does one draw the line to declare it a likely fiction and, more importantly, false until shown otherwise?"
- Allen Glenn,
http://users.rcn.com/rostmd/winace/critica...able_claims.htm