Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> Serious Discussion -> Consent
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2004-09-25 at 01:00:12
QUOTE
Hopefully if people "had sex all the time" someone would have enough brains to use birth control. I'll give you some facts: The pill is 99% effective. A properly used condom is 96% effective. Using both, .01 x .04 = .0004 chance of having a kid. Or, hell, us guys can get vasectomies and blow their brains out with a nice 0% chance of having a kid. I think they're reversible nowadays, too.


vasectomony and theres a good chance that you won't "enjoy" it nearly as much. tongue.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by LegacyWeapon on 2004-09-25 at 01:06:27
QUOTE(DT_Battlekruser @ Sep 25 2004, 12:00 AM)
vasectomony and theres a good chance that you won't "enjoy" it nearly as much.  tongue.gif
[right][snapback]78551[/snapback][/right]

A vasectomony is only 99.9% effective. My health teacher's friend got pregnant after having done a vasectomony...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by .matrix//Merovingian on 2004-09-25 at 01:08:53
QUOTE(LegacyWeapon @ Sep 24 2004, 10:06 PM)
A vasectomony is only 99.9% effective. My health teacher's friend got pregnant after having done a vasectomony...
[right][snapback]78561[/snapback][/right]

Really? That's weird. Just to be safe, use a condom and have your girl take the pill.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by LegacyWeapon on 2004-09-25 at 01:10:21
But a male vasectomony is 100% I think
I'm not sure I only learned this last year and I cant even remember it now...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2004-09-25 at 01:13:45
QUOTE
A vasectomony is only 99.9% effective. My health teacher's friend got pregnant after having done a vasectomony...


ROFL vasectomony is only for guys. When you cut egg tubes its called something else...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by LegacyWeapon on 2004-09-25 at 01:14:42
You dont cut the egg tubes, you tie them up...
And it is called Vasectomony...
I learned this stuff not a year ago... closedeyes.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mini Moose 2707 on 2004-09-25 at 09:21:55
No, a vesectomy is tying the seminal vesicle of the male. It has no effect on pleasure, it just keeps sperm from ever entering the ejaculatory fluids.
Females can have their tubes tied, which prevents eggs from coming through to get fertizlized by the male. I forgot what that's called, though.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Shadow-Ninja on 2004-09-25 at 10:25:06
if both people want to have sex, they both agree (not forced blackmailed or somthing like that) and there a reasonable age, like 15+ then it should be ok
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Chill on 2004-09-25 at 12:58:21
How the hell is there a .1% change? huh.gif
Dude i think your health teacher is full of censored.gif .
Report, edit, etc...Posted by man6311 on 2004-09-27 at 19:07:05
I wouldn't want vesectomy. someday i would like to have babys. but what floats your boat, floats your boat.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by dashrike on 2004-09-27 at 19:49:32
QUOTE(BeeR_KeG[eM])
Back in pre-history people usually had children at about 14
In ancient Sparta girls had children at 17

I think that above 16 would be ok since they already matured psysically. It's their problem if they didn't mature mentaly.


The difference of that is that the girls back in history had to mature earlier to survive. You remember that they were also working full time by the age of around 8... Thats just a little different than nowadays...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2004-09-27 at 20:01:30
Girls didn't work in history -.-

Until recently (1950ish), women were only "used" as mothers and were literally forbidden to work, so don't come and tell me they were working full time at 8 tongue.gif

Boys, yes.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by dashrike on 2004-09-27 at 20:03:49
I was meaning in more rural areas, like farms, where girls did work.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2004-09-27 at 20:07:50
Even then... They weren't treated like queens anyway, and they were having children at young age; worst, it was with her brothers, sometimes.

I honestly don't see how work and sex had anything to do with consent back in these times (opposite to now)
Report, edit, etc...Posted by dashrike on 2004-09-27 at 20:09:24
It doesn't really, but somebody brought up the point that people used to have kids a lot earlier, and I was just explaining how it was a little different back then... :/
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Wolf on 2004-09-27 at 21:34:42
QUOTE(FireKame @ Sep 18 2004, 11:14 PM)
the problem with all of this is that if you get a girl pregnant, (especially under-age, more or less) she will claim she was raped.
[right][snapback]75514[/snapback][/right]



QUOTE(Wolfmasterkouga @ Sep 18 2004, 11:20 PM)
Its ok to have sex as long as the gurl wants it. But there should be no babys..... Cuz god doesn't want more people in heaven...
[right][snapback]75521[/snapback][/right]



I AGRRE with FireKame and it's very true

and to you Wolfmasterkouga
YOUR VERY WEIRD
Report, edit, etc...Posted by bengals2k4 on 2004-09-27 at 21:46:05
You shouldn't have sex with a girl if you know shes a minor cuz you really can't risk her being pregnant and it will just create this big mess.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by dashrike on 2004-09-27 at 21:54:09
It just takes a little more maturity than most people have [myself included]. I just got lucky and found a girl who wouldn't.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by man6311 on 2004-09-29 at 16:53:27
QUOTE(bengals2k4 @ Sep 27 2004, 07:46 PM)
You shouldn't have sex with a girl if you know shes a minor cuz you really can't risk her being pregnant and it will just create this big mess.
[right][snapback]80019[/snapback][/right]


exactly it is easier just to wait. you have waited 17 or so years. how much could it hurt to wait one or two more.


and i agree with fox, Wolfmasterkouga you are very weird
Next Page (2)