QUOTE(SA_Max71)
In the bible (in the new testament I believe) you can see that God exists by looking at nature.
You are affirming the consequence. You assume that A implies B, B is true, therefore A is true. I''ll demonstrate why this is a flawed line of reasoning.
"If there are invisible fairies interacting in this world, they will pull this rock towards the center of the earth if I let go of this rock. The rock has dropped to the ground, therefore invisible fairies exist."
"If we are in a Sims video game, we will expect to see order in the universe. The universe is ordered, therefore we are in a Sims video game."
Again, since B is true, you assume A is also true.
Another flaw in this reasoning is that you predict things "as they already are." There is nature because there is a God. It would be like me saying that the entire universe is just a by-product of your imagination, I'm not real, you're insane and just imagining me. Or the entire universe was just created five minutes ago with even our memories of "earlier" events intact. I never typed this post, even though I remember doing it and my fingerprints are on the keyboard, the universe was just created that way. No risky prediction was made, I'm just predicting it as it already is. These theories by the way, can explain why nature exist just as well as god can, but applying the law of parsimony, we shouldn't bother with it unless we have evidence for it.
QUOTE
This is assuming the big bang "theory" happened. About 3 years ago, some scientists in Alberta (Canada) found some fossilized dolphin bones that according to carbon dating, the bones were just as old as the early dinosaurs - which means the big bang "theory" must be wrong.
It wouldn't suprise me that the dolphin died less than 150 ago. Carbon dating only works for items that are older than 150 years and younger than 50,000 years. Creationist should actually know better than to cite examples of deliberate misuse of carbon dating. It's like citing the misuse of a meterstick to measure the thickness of a hair and then claiming that meterstick measurements are flawed, but honesty seems to be something creationist are willing to sacrifice. I guess they can ask Jesus for forgiveness later.
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD011.htmlThere are other dating methods that I've never seen creationist attempt to refute, such as Argon dating, which is very accurate.
QUOTE
But, carbon dating assumes the flood that happened during Noah’s time didn’t happen.
And you're assuming the flood did happen. Those scientist also assume the entire universe didn't pop into existence five minutes ago with even our memories of "earlier" events intact. What folley, eh?
QUOTE
(Besides, how could the big bang "theory" expand from something that isn't there?)
He was talking about evolution, not big bang. Actually, he was more in the vicinity of abiogensis, and not evolution. Evolution doesn't explain how the first living thing came to be, it explains biodiversity. Scientist aren't sure how the first life came into existence, but that is not required to know the evolution phenomena. If scientist didn't know how the first atom came into existence, it wouldn't impede their ability to explain chemistry.
The big bang definatly happened, and the idea was actually proposed by a priest and atheist were actually against it while theist were arguing for it. The big bang was an example of something comming from nothing, which was evidence for a god-like phenomenon, so this actually strengthened the religion side. Prior to that, scientist thought the universe just always existed, it wasn't created from anything. With the big bang, theist can argue that the universe did derive from somthing rather than just simply existing. Now it seems atheist argue for it, and theist argue against it. Oh, the irony.
QUOTE
there isn't a god. However, God does exists.
Uh, you failed to answer his question. If we did achieve the alleged afterlife, what is the point of the afterlife?
QUOTE
is the god you are refering to "God"? If so, God doesn't like to see bad things happen - but He will always turn bad things into good things. Bad things happen because of a fallen angel tempted Adam and Eve - and they gave in.
Well, if God would send me to Hell for something as meager as disbelief, I think he's a sick bastard. He's supposedly omniscient, so he creates me, knowing full ahead of time that in 80 years I won't believe in him, and he uses disbelief as a justifiable farce to toss me into the pit.
He created an angel, knowing that that angel will become corrupted and rebel. He creates a test for Adam and Eve, again, knowing that they will fail so that he can use the fall as an excuse to doom all of mankind.
Thanks for hiding from me all my life, showing all the signs of non-existence, giving a rational mind to come to the conclusion that you don't exist, then when I die and find out you do exist, you burn me in Hell for being less that what you created me to be. How can we have free will if our actions can be predicted ahead of time?
Anyone answer this: if
you were God, where woulld you send an atheist like me?
ADDITION:
QUOTE(SA_Max71)
Nothing "created" God. God has always existed and always will exist (Genesis, in the bible, states this).

Yeah, and we all know how reliable the bible is. The veracity of the bible is something you should confirm when trying to prove the existence of God. Instead, you use it as part of your conclusion. That's question begging, aka circular logic.
QUOTE
When we die, are soul goes to hevean or hell. It all depends on the choices we have made during are time on earth.
Again, God already knows if we're going to heaven or hell. He's omniscient. He created me, knowing my genetics, enviornment, every influence, and every factor that will cause me to not belief, and he will use my non-belief as a justifiable farce to toss me into Hell. God seems more like an evil tyrant than a benevolent being.
QUOTE
Wow... my total post has more than 2,700 charactors (including bb codes). (BTW, most of the color in this post is "brown"
Heh, just wait till you visit high-octane debate forums.
