Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> Website Feedback, Bugs & Discussion -> Ban Kow?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kow on 2004-12-11 at 19:40:06
Perhaps, it edits your minerals to where it WOULD be if you had posted that originally?
Or maybe every time you edit, you lose, say 2 minerals.

A suspension sounds fine...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathknight on 2004-12-11 at 19:41:36
Since December 4th, 2004, Kow has abused the mineral system and has done so for 88 of his posts. Each post gained him 16 minerals. Therefor he should be fined for 1408 minerals, and given a punishment of suspension for 3 days.


Clokr_, it wasn't a bug, it was abuse.


QUOTE
yea, listen to Clokr_ ¡VIVA ESPAÑA! minerals arent more important than members, come on

Meaning you are telling Kow that minerals are not important right? Or is that directed towards me?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Reever on 2004-12-11 at 19:45:42
*agrees*
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Revelade on 2004-12-11 at 19:47:15
Actually maybe he did it to prove a point. I'm not saying it is right, but then again if he has been saying there are errors and they aren't getting fixed, maybe he was trying to say "GET IT FIXED".
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Clokr_ on 2004-12-11 at 19:49:28
If it was not a bug then the mineral system SUCKS.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Reever on 2004-12-11 at 19:49:46
He could of said "hey theres bug here i only did it a few times to see if it was one so here it is" thats gets bugs fixed faster
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathknight on 2004-12-11 at 19:51:02
No, because if he was, it belonged in the feedback forum. I'll say it again, it isn't a bug, but it doesn't make it right. He made the post, he got the minerals, like it was suppose to do, then he edited the post and reduced it(removing his spam), and the system did not take minerals away, also as it was not programmed to do.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Clokr_ on 2004-12-11 at 19:53:24
well, tell me what rule he broke. Where does it say that you cant edit the posts for make them smaller?

EDIT: DK, you are the first that exploits SC bugs, and now you are complaining about exploiting something that is not even a bug? lol
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Reever on 2004-12-11 at 19:57:09
*Creates rule* Editing your posts to make them smaller and to bug up the system to gain a ibgger mineral count is prohibited.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathknight on 2004-12-11 at 19:58:15
He was spamming, and spamming is technically not allowed on SEN correct? Spamming, then editing the post, is still spamming.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Reever on 2004-12-11 at 20:01:19
Yea spamming is not aloowed so he deserves some punisemnt.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2004-12-11 at 20:02:49
Kow's much better than Salacious. If anyone is to be banned ban Sala tongue.gif

BTW, I don't know if anyone noticed, but there's something called "WARN LEVEL". Use it. And FINE Kow if he've been abusing. Like 10,000 minerals. He'll have to work his way throught negative minerals to get back.


Kow owns most other members here.

Another edit: Alot (ALOT) of other members ALSO spam for no censored.gif ing reasons, and they're still here *coughreevercough*. Banning ain't a solution. Kow owned the mineral system. Fix it, punish a little, and end this there. Banning is for serious FORUM offence (minerals are only killing this website).
Report, edit, etc...Posted by SaLaCiouS(U) on 2004-12-11 at 20:07:11
SaLaCiouS is too awesome to ban. Kow will be punished, somehow, but probably not by me I will let Isolated decide.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathknight on 2004-12-11 at 20:09:26
You're right, banning is a little unrealistic, but I believe the punishment I suggested was justified.

QUOTE
Since December 4th, 2004, Kow has abused the mineral system and has done so for 88 of his posts. Each post gained him 16 minerals. Therefor he should be fined for 1408 minerals, and given a punishment of suspension for 3 days.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2004-12-11 at 20:09:52
There are limits for having an oversized ego, and you're breaking that limit by posting semi-flamming threads about other people, or useless ones about yourself. Even though you have very interesting statements, it gets on the nerves to keep seeing someone that shouts to everyone hes a god...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by NeoNightmareX on 2004-12-11 at 20:20:28
QUOTE(Ðeathknight @ Dec 11 2004, 07:41 PM)
Meaning you are telling Kow that minerals are not important right? Or is that directed towards me?
[right][snapback]109302[/snapback][/right]

directed towards you, cmon, just fine and suspend him, don't ban him
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kow on 2004-12-11 at 20:56:50
It almost seems like a challenge to work my way up back to zero if i get in major debt...

Ah! 50/50 Votes!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Moogle on 2004-12-11 at 21:05:16
I disagree let kow stay he a friend -_- u know a " Friend " im sure u wouldnt ban your own friends =/ unless ur evil heartless bastard bah I VOTE NO!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by EzDay281 on 2004-12-11 at 21:19:30
Actualy, someone would only NOT ban his own friends if he was biased.
But, anyways.

"Kow's much better than Salacious. If anyone is to be banned ban Sala tongue.gif

BTW, I don't know if anyone noticed, but there's something called "WARN LEVEL". Use it. And FINE Kow if he've been abusing. Like 10,000 minerals. He'll have to work his way throught negative minerals to get back.


Kow owns most other members here.

Another edit: Alot (ALOT) of other members ALSO spam for no censored.gif ing reasons, and they're still here *coughreevercough*. Banning ain't a solution. Kow owned the mineral system. Fix it, punish a little, and end this there. Banning is for serious FORUM offence (minerals are only killing this website)."

Words of wisdom right there. Especially the comments about Sala wink.gif


I say don't ban Kow.

Also, the reason spamming is considered against the rules is because it's a waste of space, loading time, and makes it hard to find posts with actual content.

True, it is spam, but it does none of the things mentioned above, and so didn't really effect anyone else.
All it did is give kow many, many minerals, which are just used for ZergPets/SCArmies.
Now, why do any of you care if he exploited a bug that just affects some stupid, boring game, that's contributing to the degrading of SEN anyway?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kow on 2004-12-11 at 21:22:40
And its not like its just for MY use! It ALL goes towards funding the prizes for the Monthly Challenges
Report, edit, etc...Posted by KaboomHahahein on 2004-12-11 at 21:47:29
Could you have just asked staff to donate some money towards your tournament?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kow on 2004-12-11 at 21:48:11
They have, but it might be cut, if we dont get enough participants (200 to each contest)
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Reever on 2004-12-11 at 23:42:38
Im not the worst spammer. There are worse than me.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2004-12-12 at 00:04:32
Please replace that last reply's "I'm" and "me" ideas by Kow.

Problem solved.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by IsolatedPurity on 2004-12-12 at 09:59:54
QUOTE(Shadow Paladin @ Dec 11 2004, 07:02 PM)
Alot (ALOT) of other members ALSO spam for no  censored.gif ing reasons, and they're still here *coughreevercough*. Banning ain't a solution. Kow owned the mineral system. Fix it, punish a little, and end this there. Banning is for serious FORUM offence (minerals are only killing this website).


That is so true... he pwned a weakness in the script. If I were to ban kow, I would have to ban some other members that abused the edit glitch... one of them that is most likely in very high standing among a lot of people here.

I could make his minerals negative 1 million, reset his post count to zero, etc... but that won't even come close to comparing to his own knowledge of the respect he lost.


On another note, if you (Sala) took it in your own hands to dish out punishment, I would mirror that punishment on you. You're only a moderator for your own forum, not SEN.
Next Page (2)