QUOTE(MillenniumArmy)
[God is] something you can't really prove but you must accept.
In other words, if you believe, then you'll see believing makes sense. Circular logic.
QUOTE
I doubt anyone living on earth is one right now.
I doubt anyone ever was.
QUOTE
The church is built for christians to serve god and praise him.
If there is a god, I don't think you'll find him in a place known to take your money, wash your brain, discredit scientific advances, and rape your kids.
QUOTE
He does exist, you can't prove it neither could you really disprove it.
...
And everyone that is Anti-God just doesn't seem to be able to answer that question and provide valid proof.

I guess everyone just missed my post about how it's folly to believe in something just because it hasn't been proven false, and how the burden of proof isn't on the skeptic, but on the person making the affirmative claim. Post #40 it was.
QUOTE
It's not sad if you dont believe in God but it is pretty sad if you believe in Final Fantasy. Believing some virtual reality game made by humans just proves how much you really dont have a life.
Instead of addressing his point, you make a personal attack on him. Nice.
QUOTE
QUOTE
Gods often take the form of some father figure, which is a theme from childhood. It could be possible that we evolved the idea of god because it served as a placebo, benefitting our psychological health. It's probably just a vestigial feature now. This is just my hypothesis.
Humans were made with the belief in god already planted in their minds. it's because of sin coming into the world that some people begin to forget about god, thus forming their own religions and arguing that god doesn't exist.
My hypothesis is more plausible because I start with what is already known, and don't multiply entities (such as God, fall of Adam & Eve, or anything that hasn't been ascertained) needlessly.
Before your explaination becomes as valid as mine, you'd have to prove God actually does exist (the Christian god, in this case), and that there was a fall in the Garden of Eden. Until then, you make superfluous assumptions that the law of parsimony would simply ignore.
See
Occam's Razor.
QUOTE
QUOTE
Leprechuans are real, and they won't exist unless you believe they exist. Do you wonder how that one guy won the lottery? It couldn't have just happened by chance, it was a leprechuan doing it.
Same could go with God.
You could insert any entity in place of God to explain this event. Such as Zeus, Anubus, my alleged Leprechaun, the ghost of the Taco Bell dog's mother, Bob the chocolate grape diety - and they would all yield the same explainatory power, that is none.
They are neither capable of confirmation or falsification, but applying Occam's Razor, you don't need those assumptions to explain the phenomena.
Again, you should start with what is already known, in my case with the lottery ticket, the phenomena can easily be explained by the law of great numbers. It doesn't make any superfluous assumption to explain the phenomena, and it's something that's already known to be true. Invoking God however, is unparsiminous because it isn't a well-established fact.
QUOTE
If you TRULY believe god exists, then he will be there for you. If you dont believe in God, he wont be there for you thus making you more inclined to not believing in him.
And if you believe in God, you'll be more prone to believe in him.
In this particular statement, you do at least make some testable predictions. I congratulate you for that. All you need to do now is run some experiments. Maybe you could drop 50 people off a cliff who believe in God, to see if he will save them, and drop 50 people who do not believe in God to see if it yields a different result.
QUOTE
Then plz explain why historical documents other than the bible state that Jesus Exists?
Without details on the observations, I can only offer possible explanations - Delusions, hallucinations, even outright lying and fraud.
QUOTE
You can't truly confirm his non existance really.
Absolutely. Because something that doesn't exist can't leave behind evidence it doesn't exist.
ADDITION:
QUOTE
You can't use science to find the causes of miracles.
Oh, yes you can. Well, actually, it depends on how you define "miracle." Me suriviving a cold? Probably not a miracle now (althought it would be hundreds of years ago, and people would invoke unparsimionus entities such as God). Surviving a car crash? That seems more acceptable, but physics can explain it.
QUOTE
That was then, this is now. We dont live in a country where religion is required or you will be threatened. We have freedom of religion.
Hm, I think Dark Magneto puts it best when he says:
QUOTE(Dark Magneto @ Blizzforums)
...this guy named moses comes down from a mountain with a set of stone tablets that have rules on them, saying that a God (yes, another one of those things, just like the Egyptians and Romans and Greeks and ancient tribesman and all the others invented). Well this one happened to be more successful than those gods of ancient past. Its values happened to also be the values of the people in that exact time period. What a coincidence, eh? Then it became outdated, so they made Yahweh v. 2.0, with the New testament. That was over 2 thousand years ago, so it's horribly outdated nowadays. You know, back then eating meat on a Friday, eating shellfish, or wearing clothes of more than 1 fabric were punishable by death. Notice we don't do that anymore. Society has evolved, and as a result, people reinterpret scriptures to say things that they don't. There's an entire practice for it called 'Apologetics', which is spin-doctoring scripture to try to shoehorn it with modern-day values.
Why did god have to write two testements? He should have just wrote a rough draft first to avoid embarassing mistakes.
QUOTE
Are u saying that there is valid evidence against christianity yet i still choose to believe in it?
Geez, you're inconsistent. First, there's no evidence against the existence of FF events or characters, and yet, you insult Mr. Coop for believing in FF. I guess Coop can say the same for you, since there is no evidence God doesn't exist (you're actually right about that one), and you choose to believe in God.
QUOTE
Did we find any proof that they didnt believe in a creator?
They didn't believe in your particular God, so they must be going to Hell, even though they had no rational reason to even suspect that was ever the case. What about the Greeks? They never even heard of your particular God, are they in Hell for non-belief?
What about third-world tribes that are oblivious to the rest of the world? They probably have their own alleged god to explain things such as thunder, volcano eruptions, a Fed-Ex planes flying by. The only way they can known about your particular God is if a missionay comes to them, gives them food to entice them before the big brainwash, and tells them all about this God character. Are they going to Hell too?
QUOTE
You're saying nothing in the bible happened? Then explain how the Temple in Jeruselum came to being if there were no Bible.
Well, the writers of the Bible were most likely real people who may have written some real things. I can write about my trip to the pool across Main Street, where I met a magic genie, but since there exist a Main Street, does there also exist a genie that I claimed to have met?
Don't believe everything you read.
ADDITION:
QUOTE(Mr.Kirbycode774)
QUOTE(DrunkenWrestler)
Hehehe, can you "Disprove" Zeus? Haven't heard anything about that.
Can you prove or disprove the existence of Zeus? Now THERE'S an obvious fallacy.
Excuse me for being direct and rude: DUH!Ah, so you do concede it's a fallacy?
QUOTE
Which is why I posted the question after it which you for some reason ignored even though you put it as part of the quote.
Excuse me for being direct and rude, but since it's a fallacy of shifting the burden of proof, it's a totally vacuous and illogical post, not to mention asinine in my opinion.
QUOTE
False trioctomy. It's like saying 1+1 is either 6, 10, or 90, when there could be other possibilities.
Which are..
Three. Possibilities aren't limited to 6, 10, and 90. Just like possibilities of prohibition aren't limited to embargoing of drugs or pure sanction. Another possibility is a drinking age of 21. Just like possibilities of Jesus aren't limited to Lord, Liar, Lunatic. I wasn't making any assertions, just alternative possibilities.
QUOTE
Well lets see... Jews were obsessed with accuracy... they would put a line of hair between each letter and if they screwed up on one letter or puncuation mark,
Can you help me clear this slight contradictions then?
4k, or 40k?
(1 Kings 4:26) Solomon had
40,000 stalls of horses for his chariots, and 12,000 horsemen.
(2 Chronicles 9:25) Now Solomon had
4,000 stalls for horses and chariots and 12,000 horsemen, and he stationed them in the chariot cities and with the king in Jerusalem.
Who's the father of Joseph?
(Matthew 1:16)
Jacob was the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, by whom Jesus was born, who is called the Messiah.
(Luke 3:23) When [Jesus] began His ministry, Jesus Himself was about thirty years of age, being, as was supposed, the son of
Joseph, the son of Eli,
Is God ominpoent?
(Jer.32:17) Ah Lord God! ... there is nothing too hard for thee.
(Jg.1:19 ) And the Lord was with Judah; and he drave out the inhabitants of the mountain;
but could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley, because they had chariots of iron.