Report, edit, etc...Posted by PwnPirate on 2005-04-02 at 18:48:43
I will post three arguments to each quote I post.
1. They will cross to the place without mines. -_-
2. Any boats would be obviously spotted before they are even completed. (It's just a river.)
3. You have not been to every inch of the border, you haven't even gone to Korea itself.
1. Disagrees with a group of people on Sen, calling them all sick too..
2. It was a joke
3. That has nothing to do with this argument.
1. Dumb
2. No offense, but the special op team would get killed before reaching either of thier targets.
3. There is no reason to invade North Korea.
1. To cripple what is left of thier money also
2. One nuke will not do anything to America, you even said so yourself.
3. Why would you want to destroy thier nuke? That would make North Koreans even more poor. BTW There are INNOCENT CIVILIANS in North Korea too, North Korea is not some crime syndicate.
1. Read your own posts
2. I didn't know flaming me was "argueing".
3. No.
We should not attack North Korea because there is no reason to and STARS is just hungry to kill people, The End.
P.S. Don't act like you know more about Korea than I do.
Tell me what kimchi is and THEN we might talk.
QUOTE
So you have been to EVERY SINGLE INCH of the border? you probably went to one or two citys on the border. The Demilitarization zone is about 2.4 miles wide (up and down of the border), and DUH cars can't go through water, way to go! You stated the obvious. Its called bridges, amphibious landing vehicles, BOATS. To move a large army you need SPACE, and in the areas that have open space on the border there are mine fields, here is PROOF there are mine fields in Korea Proof website in the article when they state 'DMZ' it means DeMilitarization Zone. And if thats not enough for you just go to google and type in 'Mines in Korea' and it will give you a billion articles.
1. They will cross to the place without mines. -_-
2. Any boats would be obviously spotted before they are even completed. (It's just a river.)
3. You have not been to every inch of the border, you haven't even gone to Korea itself.
QUOTE
and 'GG" this isn't a game....this is REAL life buddy, it scares me that you sound like you are relating this to a game which is sick...really.
1. Disagrees with a group of people on Sen, calling them all sick too..
2. It was a joke
3. That has nothing to do with this argument.
QUOTE
And what does America being Baised have to do with Korea? What does me have to do with North Korea? I am just saying all America should do is invade North Korea with Spec. Op. teams that we have.
1. Dumb
2. No offense, but the special op team would get killed before reaching either of thier targets.
3. There is no reason to invade North Korea.
QUOTE
To make sure North Korea doesn't sell that nuke to the wrong hands/people America fears will nuke us. And this can go with what you said about North Korea not having the money or matrials to build another nuke.
1. To cripple what is left of thier money also
2. One nuke will not do anything to America, you even said so yourself.
3. Why would you want to destroy thier nuke? That would make North Koreans even more poor. BTW There are INNOCENT CIVILIANS in North Korea too, North Korea is not some crime syndicate.
QUOTE
Oh, I didn't know argueing with you is flaming.....
1. Read your own posts
2. I didn't know flaming me was "argueing".
3. No.
We should not attack North Korea because there is no reason to and STARS is just hungry to kill people, The End.
P.S. Don't act like you know more about Korea than I do.
Tell me what kimchi is and THEN we might talk.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2005-04-02 at 20:39:56
You won't even admit that you are wrong....wow....We know where the areas are that have no mines, so we will know they must go to those places and thats where we can ambush North Koreans and such! And what does me not having been to Korea have to do with this? I haven't been there and even I knew there were mines and you didn't.
"GG" I was refering to YOU about THIS topic. Which doesn't apply to all SEN members, which means YOU were the only one who stated GG in this topic, which means my earlier post only applies to YOU. Stop acting innocent, and stop trying to act like SEN is against me and with you, that has nothing to do with this topic.
Spec. Op. teams could easly get into North Korea and do their jobs with out COMPLETE mission failure. Maybe one or two members are killed but mission success has more of a chance success then failure.
Did you read what I said earlier cleary enough? I ment act on them only if they are going to sell their nuke to people who we KNOW might nuke us. Personally I would like to see North Korea go bankrupt and then a new leader of the country would spring up, possibly one that has Americas interests at heart.. And one nuke won't destroy America but it will cripple our national spirit and cause devastation. Think 9/11 x10 or 20. Also, destroying a nuke WON'T set it off. It must FIRST be armed and primed. This is for control measures for the safety of the scientists and people building it.
If Im geussing correctly kimchi is just kimchi. I probably wrong, I'm sorry Im not too interested in your fooked up country. Its not THAT important to me and its pretty small.
P.S. Don't act like I know NOTHING about Korea. and I'm Hungry to kill North Koreans, well at least the ones who aren't innocent
"GG" I was refering to YOU about THIS topic. Which doesn't apply to all SEN members, which means YOU were the only one who stated GG in this topic, which means my earlier post only applies to YOU. Stop acting innocent, and stop trying to act like SEN is against me and with you, that has nothing to do with this topic.
Spec. Op. teams could easly get into North Korea and do their jobs with out COMPLETE mission failure. Maybe one or two members are killed but mission success has more of a chance success then failure.
Did you read what I said earlier cleary enough? I ment act on them only if they are going to sell their nuke to people who we KNOW might nuke us. Personally I would like to see North Korea go bankrupt and then a new leader of the country would spring up, possibly one that has Americas interests at heart.. And one nuke won't destroy America but it will cripple our national spirit and cause devastation. Think 9/11 x10 or 20. Also, destroying a nuke WON'T set it off. It must FIRST be armed and primed. This is for control measures for the safety of the scientists and people building it.
If Im geussing correctly kimchi is just kimchi. I probably wrong, I'm sorry Im not too interested in your fooked up country. Its not THAT important to me and its pretty small.
P.S. Don't act like I know NOTHING about Korea. and I'm Hungry to kill North Koreans, well at least the ones who aren't innocent
Report, edit, etc...Posted by PwnPirate on 2005-04-02 at 21:23:16
QUOTE
who we KNOW might nuke us.
Like I said, a nuke poses no danger to America.
QUOTE
We know where the areas are that have no mines, so we will know they must go to those places and thats where we can ambush North Koreans and such!
Yes mm hmm, innocent North Koreans looking for a better life to get shot down. If war was declared there wouldn't be a chance they would make it across the river, they would die, dur, that's why the bridge was destroyed.
QUOTE
Personally I would like to see North Korea go bankrupt and then a new leader of the country would spring up, possibly one that has Americas interests at heart.
No, North Koreans will starve and die you heartless... *COUGH*
Like I pointed, and like you persist to not to listen to, America's way is not the best way.
QUOTE
Also, destroying a nuke WON'T set it off. It must FIRST be armed and primed. This is for control measures for the safety of the scientists and people building it.
When the hell did I say anything about that?
QUOTE
I probably wrong, I'm sorry Im not too interested in your fooked up country. Its not THAT important to me and its pretty small.
O. M. G. Ok I am not posting in this topic anymore.
You disgust me.
Hopefully someone else can come by and "enlighten" you.
Addition: Sorry, I expected too much of you. No one can "enlighten" you.
Btw: I didn't run away, you chased me away with your crudeness.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2005-04-03 at 14:40:50
NIce, real mature, run away from an arguement, hahaha what ever, I sort of predicted this would happen.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Oo.ZeALoT.oO on 2005-04-04 at 17:53:50
Though i do think korea will try and pull a world war 2 thing like germany, i think it is a bad time for the US to go kick more ass bcuz they were just slaughtering a bunch of iraqies and if they went off to kill a bunch of koreans the world would b like woh wtf? u just finished killing another country and now ur after them!?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2005-04-04 at 22:46:47
The United States should not invade Korea. Why? Because Kim Jong-Il (sp?) is not stupid (well, thats debatable...). If he used a nuclear weapon on the United States, or any other country, it would provoke an instant response from most of the world.
I'm assuming that Kim Jong-Il is enjoying his rule, and would NOT like to be removed from power with most of his army destroyed. No one is going to stand by and watch North Korea nuke someone without provoking a response.
Plus, I still have faith in the talks.
I'm assuming that Kim Jong-Il is enjoying his rule, and would NOT like to be removed from power with most of his army destroyed. No one is going to stand by and watch North Korea nuke someone without provoking a response.
Plus, I still have faith in the talks.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2005-04-10 at 03:36:35
North Korea is like a bullet ant.
America is like a human with a boot.
America is annoyed by North Korea's presence and wants to smoosh it. If America misses then North Korea could crawl up America's leg and bite it. AND OUCH WTF!!!!! North Korea's bites hurt becuase they are bullet ants.
See my example?
Bullet ant = North Korea = small, but has nukes
Human = America = Big, but has more nukes
America is like a human with a boot.
America is annoyed by North Korea's presence and wants to smoosh it. If America misses then North Korea could crawl up America's leg and bite it. AND OUCH WTF!!!!! North Korea's bites hurt becuase they are bullet ants.
See my example?
Bullet ant = North Korea = small, but has nukes
Human = America = Big, but has more nukes
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Wilhelm on 2005-04-10 at 09:24:04
So North Koreans are as intelligent as ants, (IE, no brain, just a nervous system), huh Chris? I think you're just angry that we didn't win in Korea. There's no reason. Kim Jong isn't crazy, stupid, or vicious, really. He's just not democratic. So what? You've got no basis for an invasion besides ONE nuke. One nuke. So they can take out a city, oh my God, oh, that's so scary! Except that there's thousands of cities in the US and the US army would sweep in and crush them. So they might have more then one? No. They would tell you! They want you to be scared, why else would they tell you about the nuke? Besides, weapons grade plutonium isn't exactly the most common element.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2005-04-14 at 21:56:38
QUOTE(Theoretical Human @ Apr 10 2005, 05:24 AM)
So North Koreans are as intelligent as ants, (IE, no brain, just a nervous system), huh Chris? I think you're just angry that we didn't win in Korea. There's no reason. Kim Jong isn't crazy, stupid, or vicious, really. He's just not democratic. So what? You've got no basis for an invasion besides ONE nuke. One nuke. So they can take out a city, oh my God, oh, that's so scary! Except that there's thousands of cities in the US and the US army would sweep in and crush them. So they might have more then one? No. They would tell you! They want you to be scared, why else would they tell you about the nuke? Besides, weapons grade plutonium isn't exactly the most common element.
[right][snapback]184615[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]184615[/snapback][/right]
ho ho ho WOW hahaha. When did I say North Koreans have the intelligence of ants? How does it feel to be completely clueless!
. One nuke can take out MILLIONS of people in ONE second. Hit New York and MILLIONS would die. WHO ARE YOU to say a city getting nuked is no big deal becuase thats how you are argueing. And how would you like it that some random terrorist nuked YOUR city that had your entire family there? How would you like it if they nuked the city you are in right now? How would you like it if they nuked your friend's city? How would you like it if they nuked your grandeparent's city or uncles etc..? And I am angry about something that happened 50 years ago(war)? dude.....I wasn't even born then, I have no control over what happen 50 years ago. So how can I be angry over something that happened that long ago, which really I don't care about Korea 50 years ago. I care about the present Korea. And I am no afraid of Korea nuking the US, I am afriad that North Korea wil sell their nuke to terrorists or people that would nuke the US. Has NO ONE been reding my posts? Thats probably the third time I have stated that.Report, edit, etc...Posted by MapUnprotector on 2005-04-16 at 18:29:12
I heard that North Koreans aren't allowed to leave the country at all, and that the media can only see what Kim Jong lets them see, like pictures and stuff. Is that true? Can anyone describe a North Koreans life style or quality of life?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-04-16 at 18:38:14
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Puni(F) on 2005-04-16 at 18:47:01
I don't see any threat... But if they make any threat on any other counter with nuclear weapons... Then I say we go over there... And make them 
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2005-04-16 at 21:54:52
Its the threat of them selling their nuke to the highest bidder (terrorists mostly). Thats what we don't want to have happen.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2005-04-17 at 07:48:57
I guess you have to compare the costs, IF North Korea sells their nuke to a terrorist organization, which action would cost more lives, a nuclear detonation in the United States, or a second Korean War?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2005-04-17 at 13:41:17
It depends on what city is blown up. Los Angeles would kill millions. New York would kill millions. Even during vietnam we didn't lose millions, but we did lose ALOT. Modern war right now I can see the US losing a couple thousand but wiping out the North Korean army. But like I said a couple times before, we shouldn't invade north korea with an army, but with special forces. Probably asian american delta or seal teams so they can blend in better then a caucasian could. Now these seal/delta teams would be stationed in North Korea in secret for months, watching the nuke and seeing whats being done with it. If it is being sold to terrorists then the seal/delta teams move in. If not then they sit and wait.