Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> Serious Discussion -> Nudity
Report, edit, etc...Posted by (U)Bolt_Head on 2004-09-17 at 12:24:10
Ok so im going to jump to the end of the thread here.

I think what you should be allowed to wear is highly dependant on your enviroment.

If i was making a highschool dress code it would be something like this . . .

Girls-
* No strapless shirts or tops with skinny straps
* No underware or private parts visable
* Abs should not be visable above the belly button
* Shorts should reach down halfway down to the knee
* Skirts should go down to the top of the knew
Guys-
* No shirts with armpits cut out or cut low
... well thats about it the guys would need to follow the same rules as the girls (except most of the time no guy would even come close to breaking those rules lol)

Then of course you would have to make your other extreme of the dress code.
* No wallet chains
* No Spiked Collars
Basicly the extream Goth stuff

As for the matter of girls dress code I enjoy seeing scantly clad attractive girls as much as any guy but school shouldn't be the place to be advertise your sex appeal. I also left out how low cut shirts could be (thats kinda hard to describe, proboly not lower than the base of the armpits).
Report, edit, etc...Posted by man6311 on 2004-09-17 at 16:27:57
there is way to much nudity. people used to worry about games being violent but now they are mad about games and nudity ever since Playboy: the mansion came out
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kow on 2004-09-17 at 22:18:27
I have no problem with people being dressed scantily. It's their choice. But when it interferes with learning at a school, a line needs to be drawn. Short skirts and shorts are fine. I have no problem with that, i just dont want to see some people with it just like underwear, or fat people wearing it. Shirts should not show any skin in the abdominal area, cleavage is fine, as long as the girls are not falling out of the shirt! eww... kinda... well i think thats it...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2004-09-17 at 23:12:00
I just saw the Resident Evil movie like 30 minutes ago, which made me think... The movie was deemed "16+ for nudity and violence scenes"; even though the only moment that there actually were nudity was at the start (where you could see the girl's right breast, slightly)... It's really pathetic.

They actually consider that it is worth warning parents of nudity cuz of a simple "indecent slip" like so...

Nudity is too much hated (even though everyone likes it).
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Necrosis666_ on 2004-09-18 at 01:12:09
i wouldnt mind watching loads of naked chicks but its the guys that gross me out. but i guess nudity is bad, dun really care lol
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2004-09-18 at 01:59:37
So many guys purmped on hormone that want to see naked people... disgust.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DJ_Dan on 2004-09-18 at 02:24:05
There are clothes that doesn't show a lot of the girl, but makes them really hot. And there are clothes that show almost everything she has inside, and anyone will see them as b*tches.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2004-09-18 at 12:18:44
That is a very good point, DJ.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Jordan on 2004-09-18 at 12:52:14
QUOTE(DT_Battlekruser @ Sep 9 2004, 09:24 AM)
Question: On a scale of 1 to 10 with 1 being fully clad and 10 being naked, where would you draw the line.  I mean there are clothes that barely cover up the "private" spots which would be a 2 or 3.  So where do you think the line should be?
[right][snapback]69365[/snapback][/right]


heh i wouldnt draw the line >:)
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Felagund on 2004-09-18 at 15:32:05
Here are the people that shouldn't be allowed to be naked: guys and ugly chicks... for everyone else clothes should be banned j/k
Report, edit, etc...Posted by High on 2004-09-18 at 22:58:08
i second Felagund's statement!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by (U)Bolt_Head on 2004-09-19 at 17:13:37
QUOTE(Shadow Paladin @ Sep 17 2004, 10:12 PM)
I just saw the Resident Evil movie like 30 minutes ago, which made me think... The movie was deemed "16+ for nudity and violence scenes"; even though the only moment that there actually were nudity was at the start (where you could see the girl's right breast, slightly)... It's really pathetic.

They actually consider that it is worth warning parents of nudity cuz of a simple "indecent slip" like so...

Nudity is too much hated (even though everyone likes it).
[right][snapback]74837[/snapback][/right]


Truely awsome movie, I saw the second one (theres more nudity in it lol) but thats not why i liked it. Its just like titanic was when it came out. It was one of the most pathedic nude sceanes ever but since he was painting her they got away with calling it artistic thus the pg13 rating. You only see one breast yet 13 year olds all around the nation went to see the movie just for that one part.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Jordan on 2004-09-19 at 17:19:33
QUOTE(Shadow Paladin @ Sep 17 2004, 10:12 PM)
I just saw the Resident Evil movie like 30 minutes ago, which made me think... The movie was deemed "16+ for nudity and violence scenes"; even though the only moment that there actually were nudity was at the start (where you could see the girl's right breast, slightly)... It's really pathetic.

They actually consider that it is worth warning parents of nudity cuz of a simple "indecent slip" like so...

Nudity is too much hated (even though everyone likes it).
[right][snapback]74837[/snapback][/right]

true but on the second Resident Evil movie had more nudity then the first so it is truely recomended because this one black guy was drivin down the road flipped a zombie and slammed on the breaks then it shows 2 zombie women at a strip club naked so that is pretty much recomended. but hey im 11 i got to c it all lol.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by CaptainWill on 2004-09-19 at 17:27:05
Nude Zombie women?

*gags*
Next Page (3)