QUOTE(PCFredZ)
I wasn't hijacking, I was referring to my statements that seemed two-sided, and your response to it, "He agrees n' in the same place swirls opinions when he realizes that it goes against his creed(s)." Kerry contradicted himself, and I wasn't trying to do that. I just have some trouble with advanced sentence structures pinch.gif ...
So, it wasn't hi-jacking. Instead it was thread derailling.

And since you brought up flip-flopping, that wasn't really it I said you stated. I was refering to
M.Army's expressed PoV's that got contradicting.
QUOTE(PCFredZ)
I clicked on the Extremism link you provided, and there it was... "Extremist, along with "radical", is a common term to describe those who tend to choose extreme methods, particularly violence to express their views, in an attempt to cause political or social change." Dictionary.com: "zealotry-- n : excessive intolerance of opposing views [syn: fanaticism]". These aren't exactly, ahem, nice words.
...
I didn't say we should applaud people, the phrasing "which are not exact what you'd say to applaud someone" should be interpreted as "which are stuff you'd say to make one feel negative".
Again I say, those weren't offensive no matter how hard you try to twist it. And 'till the day some of the site's
mod(s)/admin(s) warns me (that I'm getting over the forums' policy or being offensive), I'll keep using'em when see fit.

(By no chance am trying to stir animosities or similars amidst the general forum goers, just stating my view point.

)
Stop with the straw-man technique that it won't do you any good. I didn't said those to make someone "feel negative" but instead as negative attitudes that would need a lil' tinkering to improve, imho.
As I was sometime in the past not far ago, told to improve my English from
IRC chatting style (mild 1337 or whatever) with the numbers n' all that jazz to a real regular English speaker... by now you can guess what I ended up doing, don't you?

QUOTE(PCFRedZ)
Wouldn't marriage of people with the same gender complicate this already disastrous society (assuming you live in the U.S.)? As in, change of last names, etc. I'm not against it, but I'm not for it.
Uhmm... How can I put this?

Look at my flag 1st.
*Hint, hint*As stated by me in other place before, open-mindedness can do wonders.
Peep here to see a conservative attempt to ban homo' marriages getting bashed no time flat. (It's from an ol' post of mine in a related subject.

)
Please tell me in wich part it (read gay marriage) offends your rights or even shortens'em up.

QUOTE(Idsa)
No according to the Christian Faith. YOU DO NOT HAVE THE HOLY SPIRIT WITHIN YOU UNTIL YOU CONFESS AND BECOME A CHRISTAIN.
that means that you CAN control yourself to do what is right in YOUR eyes, not in the Holy Spirit's eyes. So thus you do not have the presence of the Holy Spirit unless you are Christian.
Where did you hear that everyone has the presence of the Holy Spirit? Not everyone does.
I heard millions of times during my childhood while getting taught Catholic religion/principles. And for about a decade, give or take a few. And if you payed any attention to what I've been saying all along, have quited on the Christian faith a while back now.

Btw, in wich 'metter' do you acknowledge that I haven't got the
Holly Spirit within me? Just wondering...
*Sarcasm*
Edit reason: Smillie fix.
