Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> Portal News -> Aftermath
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Cole on 2006-09-06 at 22:34:52
QUOTE
My question to you all, is who's got the balls to to step forward and support this? I do.

I like the idea, always have.

QUOTE
It does seem that way, doesn't it? And I'm scheduled to be hit by a truck (long story, all a joke though)

lol, I was suppose to get hit by a bus.....last year around this time. I'm still waiting for it to show up..... Maybe next year...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tuxedo Templar on 2006-09-06 at 22:37:33
QUOTE(DT_Battlekruser @ Sep 6 2006, 09:27 PM)

It seems to be the raging argument that either LW should have been left unscathed or he should have been banned.  It seems Moose holds my thoughts on unprotection and the intellectual rights of mappers.  Don't get me wrong, I support the concept of an open source.  However, I believe it is the right of the creator to withold his map from others.  It is therefore still official SEN policy that we do not support unprotection.

LegacyWeapon did not directly violate any rule of SEN, as many debators have ceaselessly pointed out.  As such, no direct action of punishment was taken.  He was neither warned, suspended, fined, nor banned.  Nonetheless, he violated the true spirit of SEN and mapmaking and also carried himself extremely unprofessionally with his handling of the release of OSMAP and its creation.  It is by these ethics violations that he is deemed unfit to be senior staff at this site.

In conclusion, I fully support all of Moose's actions for the above reasons and also agree that he went neither too far nor not far enough.

[right][snapback]556768[/snapback][/right]
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Golden-Fist on 2006-09-06 at 22:43:18
QUOTE(SiLeNT(U) @ Sep 6 2006, 09:18 PM)
I have nothing against Legacy but I applaud Moose's actions in this matter. He demonstrated that you will be punished regardless of your position or status.[right][snapback]556764[/snapback][/right]

You can't be serious.
If he was not a global mod he would be banned. As for people saying "Well, he didn't spread it on SEN" that is a mere loophole that you guys created so you could all be nicer to him. He made it to affect STARCRAFT MAP MAKING, SEN is the biggest map making community, so it was his intentions for it to affect SEN. Obviously, he's not a moron I'm going to ask a question very boldly:
Why the F*CK would someone who's trying to hide the fact they were trying to destroy any chance map makers had secuirty over their map use their OWN NAME (Thus REVEALING WHO IT IS) and then spread it on SEN?
You guys think "Well he just didn't want SEN to be affect" no, he just wasn't a fool. He knew if he had posted on an alt account an ip would traced to him, or either way, it would leave a loose end of "Who made OSMAP" and after a few hours of investigating it would lead to him. It's pretty much like sniping someone over the border. If I'm in Spain at the border and some important French person is about to cross the border but I shoot him before he can get to it, I shouldn't be charged because it "DIDN'T HAPPEN IN FRANCE."

But why do I bother, this is SEN we're talking about, something can be so wrong you'll be banned but as soon as it affects the people running the site policies change. Here's what will happen: Legacy is demodded (Big surprise) a few months (2-3) of struggle in the mod area since there's a lack of a Global mod. And since SEN is mostly morons anyway no new mods are appointed so they to: LegacyWeapon. Man that punishment really sunk in, I'm sure no one will ever try doing this again.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2006-09-06 at 22:51:34
No, if LegacyWeapon was not a Global Moderator, he would not have been banned. He never posted a link or any other method for downloading OSMAP anywhere on this site. He simply would have seen nobody stick up for him and would have drowned in a mountain of flame.

QUOTE
If I'm in Spain at the border and some important French person is about to cross the border but I shoot him before he can get to it, I shouldn't be charged because it "DIDN'T HAPPEN IN FRANCE."


The French authorities have absolutely no right to charge you for that crime unless the Spanish government agrees to extradict you to French to face charges. If, instead, the Spanish government didn't care, then the French could do nothing short of invading Spain or sending assassins or kidnappers to get at you.

QUOTE
a few months (2-3) of struggle in the mod area since there's a lack of a Global mod. And since SEN is mostly morons anyway no new mods are appointed so they to: LegacyWeapon. Man that punishment really sunk in, I'm sure no one will ever try doing this again.


Unless he undergoes some major change of character, LegacyWeapon will not be coming back as a staff member. Even if he did, it wouldn't be in a period as short as two months.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kenoli on 2006-09-06 at 22:55:49
Many of you are extremely presumptuous, it's disturbing.

I use OSMAP mainly to "fix" old maps that use overlaps in the map name, to make them playable again. It can be a useful tool.
On the other hand, it would be nice if there was no protection at all, then unprotection wouldn't be necessary.
Protection is bad.

From what I've seen, protecting a map is a death sentence. People like to make new versions of maps.
Take Team Micro Arena or Nexus Destroyers as an example. Nobody plays the original versions anymore. The longevity of the maps comes from the player's ability to edit them.
In TMA emerald I see this:
QUOTE
Map by JaySmurff aka Cygnus[x.1]
Perfect by Pepsi_One
Crystal  by MidKnight aka i.Knight
Gold by Two_Timer
Saphire by 6.sided.sniper
Emerald by Kynan
That's not map stealing, that's collaboration, and many TMA players consider Emerald to be one of the best versions ever made.
Think that would have happened if the original had been protected? No.

By the way, anti-unprotection zealots, OSMAP's existance dosen't automatically void all protection in the universe. The program itself isn't even particularly well known. If you protect you map, chances are that it will be reasonably safe. (though, as mentioned above, it could end up being the doom of it)
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tuxedo Templar on 2006-09-06 at 23:13:23
Wow Kenoli, good point. But still, should it really be in the hands of just any bnet character to be doing 'updates' to maps? That's the real point here.

Supposedly, blizzard patches aren't supposed to destroy maps. That seems to be an issue mainly with the recent one. Unless it happens again in any significant way, I don't think that necessarily voids protection use. For that we'd have to wait and see, though.

ADDITION:
By the way, map "collaboration" isn't necessarily the rule. Most of the time its just rigging or counter-rigging. Occasionally also stealing.

Bnet ain't no wikipedia, you know.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kenoli on 2006-09-06 at 23:21:41
QUOTE(Tuxedo Templar)
should it really be in the hands of just any bnet character to be doing 'updates' to maps?
Yes.

QUOTE(Tuxedo Templar)
Bnet ain't no wikipedia, you know.
There are quite a few maps that have been enhanced by edits from random battle.net people.
Even when it's nothing but rigging, it keeps the map popular. If people have fun playing it, what else matters?

Also, SEN is a bit different that battle.net. There's no reason for people to not collaborate on maps here. We are all capable of not erasing names from a map.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Zeratul_101 on 2006-09-06 at 23:29:38
Kenoli, in reply to your previous post, what you showed us was editting(for good or for bad) and i really don't think anyone has a problem with that. the problem comes when people map steal and erase all the previous owners.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tuxedo Templar on 2006-09-06 at 23:30:26
QUOTE(Kenoli @ Sep 6 2006, 10:21 PM)
QUOTE(Tuxedo Templar)
Bnet ain't no wikipedia, you know.
There are quite a few maps that have been enhanced by edits from random battle.net people.
Even when it's nothing but rigging, it keeps the map popular. If people have fun playing it, what else matters?

Also, SEN is a bit different that battle.net. There's no reason for people to not collaborate on maps here. We are all capable of not erasing names from a map.
[right][snapback]556792[/snapback][/right]

Well I never implied every map needs protection. Some, like RPGs, would definitely benefit from it, though. Maps that generally benefit less from being publicly accessible than they risk from being outright stolen, that is.

The issue isn't about what possible gain there is from having unprotection. It's about whether it's ok to remove the option for those wishing not to have their works stolen. If they don't wish that, or don't care, then that's fine. In fact, I would encourage keeping open source if you can afford it, as I try to make a practice of myself lately.

But for some things, and some contexts, you just can't.


QUOTE
QUOTE(Tuxedo Templar)
should it really be in the hands of just any bnet character to be doing 'updates' to maps?
Yes.

Authors should always have more say in the matter of their own creations than random bnet strangers. Not everyone can afford to have to prove their sincerity if it comes under fire in cases of theft. And some don't even try, and then you have one less map maker in the community.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2006-09-07 at 00:10:00
QUOTE
Even when it's nothing but rigging, it keeps the map popular. If people have fun playing it, what else matters?


And there are also a large portion of cases where such unprotection destroys a map's balance and integrity.

Regardless of the virtues or sins of unprotection and protection, it is the right of the original creator of the map to decide whether others should edit his map. Unprotection violates that right.

Like I said before, if you think protecton is evil and destroys mapping, don't protect your maps. If others want to, that's their business, and their right which should be preserved.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MillenniumArmy on 2006-09-07 at 00:20:04
QUOTE(DT_Battlekruser @ Sep 6 2006, 09:27 PM)

It seems to be the raging argument that either LW should have been left unscathed or he should have been banned.  It seems Moose holds my thoughts on unprotection and the intellectual rights of mappers.  Don't get me wrong, I support the concept of an open source.  However, I believe it is the right of the creator to withold his map from others.  It is therefore still official SEN policy that we do not support unprotection.

LegacyWeapon did not directly violate any rule of SEN, as many debators have ceaselessly pointed out.  As such, no direct action of punishment was taken.  He was neither warned, suspended, fined, nor banned.  Nonetheless, he violated the true spirit of SEN and mapmaking and also carried himself extremely unprofessionally with his handling of the release of OSMAP and its creation.  It is by these ethics violations that he is deemed unfit to be senior staff at this site.

[right][snapback]556768[/snapback][/right]

Remember when devilesk won the july map making contest? People female doged and female doged saying that he shouldn't have won because of his reputation as a member, not a map maker.

You guys are doing exactly the same thing with LegacyWeapon. Just because he created OSMAP you think he should no longer be a global moderator. Yes he will probably lost much respect as a person by many of us, but that does not mean he should be revoked of his license to moderate. He's one of our best moderators out there; firing him only hurts SEN.

Like with Devilesk, you guys are making up completely irrelevant excuses to revoke someone of their status. You're using invalid reasons to fire LW from his position as a Global Moderator.


Oh, and just so you know, being a Global moderator isn't a status; it's a job. Status is your reputation as a person; whether you're a staff member or not. For instance, Tuxedo-templar. Although he's only a Regular, he's still got status. LegacyWeapon probably has low status now, but that has nothing to do with him being a moderator.


But w/e... please lets just forget this whole thing guys. The more we female dog about it, the worse it all becomes. Let us fill our minds with other issues and continue on with our lives as if nothing happened; we were doing fine a day or two ago weren't we?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kupo on 2006-09-07 at 00:51:29
wow you guys all freak out, its just a game!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2006-09-07 at 01:11:42
QUOTE
You guys are doing exactly the same thing with LegacyWeapon. Just because he created OSMAP you think he should no longer be a global moderator. Yes he will probably lost much respect as a person by many of us, but that does not mean he should be revoked of his license to moderate. He's one of our best moderators out there; firing him only hurts SEN.


It's not "just because he created OSMAP". It's because of the way he handled himself with it and the lack of judgement and professionality he demonstrated. Both judgement and professionality are essential qualities in being Staff; thus he was fired.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Carlsagan43 on 2006-09-07 at 01:21:20
He took advantage of his position and Mod power to make that Protection sticky. He told people to tell him the new protection methods, so he got an easy ride to breaking them. He abused his power.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kenoli on 2006-09-07 at 01:21:21
QUOTE(DT_Battlekruser)
Regardless of the virtues or sins of unprotection and protection, it is the right of the original creator of the map to decide whether others should edit his map. Unprotection violates that right.

Like I said before, if you think protecton is evil and destroys mapping, don't protect your maps. If others want to, that's their business, and their right which should be preserved.
What you're saying is foreign to me, I don't underatnd how you can actually belive this.
It's comical really.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MillenniumArmy on 2006-09-07 at 01:36:35
QUOTE(DT_Battlekruser @ Sep 7 2006, 12:11 AM)
It's not "just because he created OSMAP".  It's because of the way he handled himself with it and the lack of judgement and professionality he demonstrated.  Both judgement and professionality are essential qualities in being Staff; thus he was fired.
[right][snapback]556828[/snapback][/right]

Well but from what I see, his "lack of judgement and professionality" existed outside of SEN; it existed when he went around on an undercover name spreading it on battle.net's forums. It existed when he secretly made his OSMAP better and better. I can see his "lack of judgement and professionality" when it comes to his actions with OSMAP, both creating it and spreading it.

... but not when it comes to his personality/actions here on SEN. SEN's rules/ettiquette apply here and only here on SEN; likewise the United States of America's laws/morals exist here and only here in the United States, nowhere else.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Desperado on 2006-09-07 at 01:46:43
This issue is quite simple. I am the only member here who has created maps that have
been played publically on Battle.net for the past four years. People are playing them
right now. Thusly, to decide if unprotection is good or bad, one only needs to look at
how it would effect me. Nothing else matters. I'll say right now, I can only be harmed by
unprotection, not benefited by it. Therefore unprotection is bad.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MillenniumArmy on 2006-09-07 at 01:50:33
QUOTE(Desperado @ Sep 7 2006, 12:46 AM)
This issue is quite simple. I am the only member here who has created maps that have been played publically on Battle.net for the past four years. People are playing them right now. Thusly, to decide if unprotection is good or bad, one only needs to look at how it would effect me. Nothing else matters. I'll say right now, I can only be harmed by unprotection, not benefited by it. Therefore unprotection is bad.
[right][snapback]556842[/snapback][/right]

So have I. I've also made maps that have been wellspread throughout battle.net.

So if you look at unprotection for me, people would still know that I am the original maker. And it's going to be hard to spread "newer" versions of my map since my versions are already being played by many people.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Desperado on 2006-09-07 at 01:58:27
QUOTE
So have I. I've also made maps that have been wellspread throughout battle.net.

When I went to make my post, I could only think of two people who have made popular
Battle.net maps who go here: MillenniumArmy and Tuxedo-Templar. Yours are the only
maps I have seen played publically. Frankly though, I hate you as a person and as a
map maker. No one would ever steal or rig your maps because they are not original
and not worth playing. Also it would be pretty hard for someone to rig Tux's fishing map.
I -suppose- Trigger Happy D could be at risk, but neither of you have maps that are
played publically at this point in time.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kookster on 2006-09-07 at 03:13:41
For the argument about asking people how things are done you cant always do that look at dabbu long gone and his map is protected.
QUOTE
"Rocks Blocks"

Protecting was never a right to the map maker maps are owned by blizzard and i quote from staredit:
QUOTE
This software program (the "Program"), any printed materials, any on-line or electronic documentation, and any and all copies and derivative works of such software program and materials are the copyrighted work of Blizzard Entertainment,

QUOTE
All use of the Editor or any New Materials is subject to this License Agreement. The Program is licensed, not sold. Your license confers no title or ownership in the Program.

Copyright © 1997 Blizzard Entertainment.  All Rights Reserved.

QUOTE
2. Ownership. All title, ownership rights and intellectual property rights in and to the Program and any and all copies thereof (including but not limited to any titles, computer code, themes, objects, characters, character names, stories, dialog, catch phrases, locations, concepts, artwork, animations, sounds, musical compositions, audio-visual effects, methods of operation, moral rights, any related documentation, and "applets" incorporated into the Program) are owned by Blizzard Entertainment or its licensors. The Program is protected by the copyright laws of the United States, international copyright treaties and conventions and other laws. All rights are reserved. The Program contains certain licensed materials and Blizzard's licensors may protect their rights in the event of any violation of this Agreement.

Copyright © 1997 Blizzard Entertainment.  All Rights Reserved.

Legacy had the right to make this program its called free will, and he didnt brake any laws, and he hasnt signed anything legally that would make it so he cant make it.
Just as Moose has the legal right to demote him.
I do not support him being demoted but i do not support the release of this program as it does allow massive amounts of crap maps to appear.
But I do approve of it in a learning aspect I have used it several times for learning purposes.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kashmir on 2006-09-07 at 07:18:47
QUOTE
He took advantage of his position and Mod power to make that Protection sticky. He told people to tell him the new protection methods, so he got an easy ride to breaking them. He abused his power.

Pulling things out of your arse. Name one piece of information that he did not already use to make OSMAP better. All he did was undo his current Uberation code. HE CREATED THAT CODE. He does not need people with the mentality of 3 year olds telling him how to make an uprotector. Case closed. We've already finished with that argument. The Question now is the reason for demotion. Which was entirely uncalled for as MA has clearly explained. Using MA's logic, if I drank alcohol in Germany where the age is 16. Then came back to the states, where the age is 21, should I be arrested for underage drinking?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by roryfenrir on 2006-09-07 at 10:03:34
QUOTE
I use OSMAP mainly to "fix" old maps that use overlaps in the map name, to make them playable again. It can be a useful tool.


I totally agree, if i would have had osmap i would have just fixed path d and income defence when the update came and just removed the over lap. (now i have versions of both that can work so im good) again, i restate my point, who are we trying to impress with our mapping skills? Not the people playing battl.net, they dont care, all of us are trying to make a good impresion and show off our skills to us on staredit.

As long as you are the first to submit a map on staredit data base, its yours as far as im concerned. And if some one would submit a game like particle arena and call it their own, we would know that that person didnt make it. Im not a popular mapper, if i saw a game named ff8 battle on the games list, even if it said some one else made it, id be happy people like my map enough to play it. (Its probably a diferent story for you popular guys)

There are many times which i could have used a map unprotector, not to steal, but like if i accedently protected my map and the .bac ver of it is way behind. Also, sometimes, i just want the .wav file! Now i see it as, why protect if theres an unprotector.

I think staredit should host the unprotector, so those of us who need it, we can use it for mapping purposes. If staredit does have it, they could host a bug-free version and make sure we dont get viruses from dling it. Weapon should be thanked, we all needed to wake up, times have changed and we should go with the enevetable, not against it.

And also remember, ITS JUST A GAME, IT WONT MATTER 2 YEARS FROM NOW WHEN YOU ARE OUT OF HIGH SCHOOL, AND IF YOU AN ADULT PLAYING SC GET A LIFE! (no offence if you guys are)
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2006-09-07 at 10:34:13
QUOTE
Legacy had the right to make this program its called free will, and he didnt brake any laws, and he hasnt signed anything legally that would make it so he cant make it.
Just as Moose has the legal right to demote him.
I do not support him being demoted but i do not support the release of this program as it does allow massive amounts of crap maps to appear.
But I do approve of it in a learning aspect I have used it several times for learning purposes.


On the contrary, the making of OSMAP is techinically illegal. So is the making of Starforge, or any other third party program fro Blizzard maps. It's just that Blizzard doesn't care.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by JaFF on 2006-09-07 at 11:37:22
QUOTE(Cnl.Fatso @ Sep 7 2006, 03:14 AM)
Now, the idea of a new-improved DB sounds excellent.

Sure it is. Just wait until v5. lmfao.gif

QUOTE(Cloud @ Sep 7 2006, 03:18 AM)
Moose if that was Yoshi modding LW would have been banned.

Wrong. Read what Yosh said about LW in the first (now locked) topic.

QUOTE(Golden-Fist @ Sep 7 2006, 05:42 AM)
If he was not a global mod he would be banned.

You are not Moose or IP, so you can't possibly know.
QUOTE(Golden-Fist @ Sep 7 2006, 05:42 AM)
And since SEN is mostly morons anyway no new mods are appointed so they to: LegacyWeapon.

I disagree. There are people with brains. Urmom, Kenoli, and some more. Moose is just hella conservative on this matter, he thinks only his current Global Mod's are worthy enough to wield the power.

QUOTE(Desperado @ Sep 7 2006, 08:46 AM)
This issue is quite simple. I am the only member here who has created maps that have
been played publically on Battle.net for the past four years. People are playing them
right now. Thusly, to decide if unprotection is good or bad, one only needs to look at
how it would effect me. Nothing else matters. I'll say right now, I can only be harmed by
unprotection, not benefited by it. Therefore unprotection is bad.

I'm interested... what maps ? And you claim that you're the only member, when there are MA, Bolt_Head, Tuxedo Templar.

QUOTE(Desperado @ Sep 7 2006, 08:58 AM)
When I went to make my post, I could only think of two people who have made popular
Battle.net maps who go here: MillenniumArmy and Tuxedo-Templar. Yours are the only
maps I have seen played publically. Frankly though, I hate you as a person and as a
map maker. No one would ever steal or rig your maps because they are not original
and not worth playing.
Also it would be pretty hard for someone to rig Tux's fishing map.
I -suppose- Trigger Happy D could be at risk, but neither of you have maps that are
played publically at this point in time.
[right][snapback]556847[/snapback][/right]

The bold part is so flawed. You claim that only original and interesting maps are rigged/stolen ? Everything gets rigged in b-net. And crap also. I think those words bypassed your logics part of the brain because, as you said, you hate him as a person and a mapmaker.

And also you say that both of them have no mpas that are played now. Well, I can say that Wall Ball is played, House of the Haunted is played, and a fiew other maps that have their name on them are played. Just go to Europe.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Gigins on 2006-09-07 at 11:46:15
LW dirty lied to us all also to moose. I think this requires no more explanations about why he did get fired. ermm.gif
Next Page (4)