QUOTE(Kellimus @ Jun 24 2005, 10:38 PM)
How many of you believe his rushing into Iraq because they have "weapons of mass destruction" (which they did, but not nuclear weapons, as he was trying to say they did) was a smart idea?
I would like to show you this quote:
Did you know that for the first half of the war, we had no armored vehicles? That shows how unprepared our country was when we invaded Iraq. But read the above quote, it explains everything.......
[right][snapback]244015[/snapback][/right]
Again, I would have expected better from you. We DID have armoured vechiles, tanks, Bradley Fighting vechiles, M113's (APC), Marine amphibious vechiles (APC), Strykers.
You must be talking about the few hummers that didn't have armor, and you know who were driving those hummers? The men in the BACK of the bus, i.e. the guys were weren't going to see any action. The emergency room medics (non combat) and water purifiers (examples). Basically the men who weren't going to see any action. But when we took over cities and the foreign insurgency started, there was no longer a 'front line' so even men who weren't suppose to see combat were being blown up.
No armoured vechiles? Please....................Do your homework before you make a statement like that.
QUOTE
Is this not how American Democracy is supposed to work? Seems to me, that the people no longer have a say of how the government is ran... Seems like the Chief Exectutive Officer (CEO) also known as the "President" is the one in charge.... And not the american people......
Well, we the people voted him for our president twice. Last election he got the most votes for any President in history, most votes since 1969.