Staredit Network

It's because they aren't as subtle as Daddy was.

To bad you're in the majority.



Hmm.. Thanks for quoting my point when it proves that he showed exactly what to do.

Saying: "Take the powers of the nation, and let the people fix it themselves" is showing what to do. You cannot go step by step on what to do, because there are millions of ways to do it, you nitwit.

That is the most generalized you can get.

Why do you always contradict what you say?

To bad I don't have time to "debate" with arrogent little kids like you. I have a life. I advise you all get one, too.

With equal rights whoever is the closest to the food would get food, people wouldn't be required to work and transport food, thus, they wouldn't do it. Humans started out as anarchists, we didn't come with a government. People saw that it didn't work out and that's why governments were made in the first place.

P.S. Disagreeing with your argument doesn't mean that I am narrow-minded and can't look at the big picture, if you say that then it's obviously the other way around.

If we know that it is wrong and usually deny the urges, then why are there so many rapes that happen every day? The law against it stops some of those sick people, but with Anarchy the whole load would be unleashed on us. Not everyone thinks like an Anarchist, and that is why Anarchy wont work out without a society of perfect people,
and.. well... there is no society of perfect people.

Demaris is right, you guys need to cool it, a comment here and there isn't bad but you guys are constantly flaming each other. Flaming doesn't get your point across, it just makes people flame you two times over.

Wow. Thanks for spamming the topic with your useless comment of reporting me for flame. You're just a whiner.

And what I said, WILL WORK. You're just to close-minded to realize how easily Anarchy would work.

Look at society before government. The caveman days. And look where we are now.

Maybe within your little fantasy world Mr knowitall.

Remember the Mesopotamians? Did the first of them have a form of government when it first started off?

My point exactly. Anarchy ruled the Sumerian's until they created their own form of government.

But since you're to blinded by your pride, you're going to ignore everything I just said, and tell me that I know nothing at all, just because i've proven you wrong.

Mesopotamia? How about Hammurabi? Pretty iron-fisted ruler.

Also, Babylon was the most successful city-state of that time. So the one with the most invested government was the most successful? Imagine that. Looks like anarchy fails in YOUR examples too.


ADDITION:

Also, City-States aren't anarchy, idiot.

anarchy did not rule the early sumerian city-states. the city-states were either ruled by kings, priests or upper classes. i do not think anarchy has ever been tried before. the reason being humans cannot exist in it.

"Reported for flaming"

And by the way: Babylonians were after Sumerians, you dolt.

Let's put it into terms that retards can understand:

James is a bully. He rules the playground with an iron fist.

Johnny get's bullied. He doesn't like it. He rises up against James.

The other little kids see him do this, and rise up, too.

Kicking James from the playground.

James no longer rules. No one rules. Anarchy.

The playground is back to it's normal way of life. Just without James there.

Then later, the school implements Recess Duties; Thus, another authority is in power.

Revolution. Caused by unrest within' a form of government. People rise up, and strike the government down. They fix themselves up.

But again, you're going to say that I'm wrong, and that you're right.

Pride blinds the weak

Put it into terms of adults, reject. Kids are dependant. Adults, are not.

It's called an example. If you're not smart enough to put it into different terms, you don't even deserve to read it.

Just to prove you wrong, here is a situation in terms of adults:


John has all the (insert high demand product here).

He only sells a few at a time, at ridiculous profit.

Now, in Anarchy, nothing is there to stop him.

With a government in place, anti-monopoly laws come into effect, thus stopping him.

ADDITION:


I WAS USING AN EXAMPLE TOO!!!!

For christ's sake, the next time you pull some crap like that, I'm letting you sit and and act dumb by yourself.

This is assuming that everything happens exactly as you say it does, which will rarely be the case.

In Anarchy, he would be dead; Thus, creating a standard way of doing things for everyone else. Enless they wished to die.

Are you to close-minded to realise that people learn from other's mistakes?

Here is another example:

Todd has something that Billy needs.

Todd is a little hoe, and witholds it from Billy.

Billy kills him, and takes it. Setting an example for others.

The example being: If someone wants something, you should share it with them, or be destroyed.

Every single other living thing on this world lives in an Anarchist form. So it's PROVEN it works.

Look where we are now. That's EXACTLY how things worked back in the day, you pudwhacker.

Ever heard of the French Revolution? Where are the French now?

Are they all dead? No.

So it's PROVEN Anarchy works.

And by the way, if it hasn't already been pointed out (As it seems like it hasn't because of your repetative ignorance) Anarchy is only temporary.

As what demaris pointed out, removing a flat tire doesn't fix the car. Unless you plan on replacing it w/ a new tire. (In this case, a new government)

like what I said before, the only thing going for anarchy is the ability to start over.

Are you a fool? That's exactly what Anarchy does! It rids the people of authority, until a new form is created!

That is what I have been saying.

Edit:

No, lions don't. Lions follow the strongest in the herd. Once that one dies out, they follow the other strongest.

Instinct.

We humans, follow what we see is the strongest (Government) Once the government fails, Anarchy prevails until another strongest (Government) is created.

But "you're right, i'm wrong".