QUOTE(Euro @ Aug 26 2005, 05:50 PM)
Actually I did know what i was talking about... that simple sketch (obviously you couldn't comprehend it) was practically saying he didn't know what was really happening. I guess i'll add you outside the circle as well.
[right][snapback]299072[/snapback][/right]
U didn't talk about anything, you made a discrimative sketch to over-expose how arrogant you think he was. Like I said before, that is needless spam, we all see how useless Neiji's post was, what's your reason for pointing it out?(No offense again). Also, your post is off the topic of what the point of what my post is. That is also why your other "sketch" was pointless, it didn't help to prove any point you were trying to make. (his post was arrogant, we get it).
Alpha... Read...
QUOTE(Devilesk)
Well those idiots that are athiest and agnostic are the equivalent to the idiot christians and catholics that they also speak of. It's mostly about not being informed. I think that's the problem with atheists. The problem with religious people is that most of them have crappy reasoning and arguments and beliefs.
QUOTE(Tdnfthe1)
Finally, someone makes the equal connection evident(meaning you put it out there). Both sides have Idiots and Intelligentes, that is a major point.
That was my point(euro), you were just an example(and I said no offense).
QUOTE(Tdnfthe1)
see the part that says unreasonably? Unreasonably would be refering to what YOUR opinion of reasonable would be, not a whole. Since you have seperate beliefs what is unreasonable to you, won't be reasonable to others since their opinions are individualized. That explains alot of things that you're trying to say about locking this topic.
Alpha you're referring to something that has nothing to do with the current view point of the thread. But since denying your way of thought makes me an idiot, I'll have to explain I guess?
QUOTE(Alpha(MC))
Seriously, with a POV on logic and reasoning, there can be no such thing as stubburness. And for the record, I didn't disagree with what I quoted from neiji. I only quoted it so my statement would go directly towards. I should've just did Neiji- (Insert Statement) So ppl wouldn't assume the wrong thing.
I took me forever to understand what you were talking about, your grammar needs a little work.
QUOTE(Tdnfthe1)
Good example of one not knowing alot of what he is saying by saying what he is.
If you're so sure of your opinions, you should've known I wasn't talking about you. I said Neiji's said something that he didn't understand the backbone behind what he said. Used your quote as a support. That cleared up for you?
How in the hell are we supposed to resolve ANY arguments with thinking like that. You're saying people should have their own way of logic?
QUOTE(Alpha(MC))
hello, my name is Leif, 1+1=3, it's my opinion of logic and reasoning. You can't prove me wrong. And you know what the scary part is? You actually CAN'T prove me wrong with that whole POV thing you got going on. And I'm not targetting just you. I'm targetting a lot of people that use this kind of mentaliy all the time. Some of it is good, but some of it just down right stupid, yet it sounds very smart.
lol, you went to the extreme on trying to say logic and opinion are crap. Once again read this.
QUOTE(Tdnfthe1)
But see the part that says unreasonably? Unreasonably would be refering to what YOUR opinion of reasonable would be, not a whole. Since you have seperate beliefs what is unreasonable to you, won't be reasonable to others since their opinions are individualized. That explains alot of things that you're trying to say about locking this topic.
Once again you're talking about the opinion part. Your words make no linking connection with that, you're saying someone having the mindset of bread being cow mucus is cow mucus and you can't tell them what it really is. My post is saying YOU, have done something, and YOU feel it is pointless to rediscuss it. It also says that people have different ideas of what reasonable is, not if an apple is really bacon or not. I just don't understand the motive or logic behind your post, but it was a post that is trying to deviate from the point of my post. Not that a point has to be replied to or commented, but you don't leap from one subject to something entirely different, that is what makes these threads feel so useless to some people. My point stands:
QUOTE(Tdnfthe1)
Now I said we shouldn't lock this topic because you think it is useless right? Again, it's only useless for you, so why shoudl YOU be here if it is useless for YOU and you agree that discussing things YOU HAVE already discussed it pointless?
Now that I've said that for the (1-2-3..) 3rd time, I hope that is clear to you now. However this topic has become off-topic and turned into many a spam of topics. So now I have no argument for it being closed for that. I personally read at least 15 posts that were just spam and rude remarks, so close it for those reasons.
~Tdnfthe1