QUOTE(devilesk @ Aug 21 2005, 08:20 AM)
No... just because others will be SAD that you are dead, doesn't mean you should be AFRAID of death. It doesn't make sense. I wouldn't be afraid, I would just AVOID death.

[right][snapback]294760[/snapback][/right]
thats an entirely unslefish view if i've ever seen one...
QUOTE(Euro @ Aug 21 2005, 12:20 PM)
Ever notice those people ( you probably haven't ) who never raise their voice yet can wlays get their point across and prove you wrong? [right][snapback]294909[/snapback][/right]
I can do it in real life...unfortunately the skill doesn't transfer to the computer

*feels sad inside now*
*back to original post* yes, man has always feared the unknown. for isntance look at darkness, people dont like it becuase they cant see in it so they dont know as easily whats coming. the reason people fear the unknown is becuase they dont have power to influence it or control it in anyway becuase it's (no brainer here) unknown and being such no known mechanism of control can be used agaisnt it. this can also be seen in the desire to see the future because people want to know whats coming, also this can be associated with the want to travel into the past so that you could change the present and control it. there is another reason why humans inheritly fear death, not only is it unknown but it also represents the ultimate lose of power, being dead you no loner have the ability to control anything.
The instinct for control over one's environment is present in almost all aspects of life. for instance this struggle and want to control your surroundings can be seen in the very concept of this forum. 1) the want to force yourself to be a wiser, better person then you currently are by partaking in discussion of seriose content 2) and more subtly the want to control the way others think by controlling discussions that are some of the most highly personal.
*ranting from here on out that is off topic but makes sense with what i ahve just posted above dont have to read becuase doesnt pertain to our discussion about the end*
now imagine that you put all these people into a area where they could try to force their control onto other peoples opionions and having them openly be able to do so. now imagine that all these people are trying just as hard as eachother to change one anothers ways to be their own. imagine all these people attempting to exert control over eachother. what would be the result? well you don't have to imagine becuase you can see a live sample here in this very forum. The natrual tendency with all this conflict occuring would be to yell and scream at one another, in this case flame.... it's not like we've ever seen any of that hear in this very forum? (irony becuase i'm semi doing it myself with this statement [ more irony in the fact that im telling you im doing it becuase i'm semi flaming myself...etc]) so I ask myself what would the more civilized tendency be? what would actually lead to productive discussion that could actually benefit people?
well for one people could not automaticly assume that everyone else is a moron that they are talking to (this is the one i have trouble with). Another thing that could help would be people who wouldnt necisarilly give their own views credit where no credit is do. I.E. syaing that your argument doesnt have a problem when it obviously does. another thing that would help is that when a opinion or statement is made, information and logical arguments are used to back up these opinions instead of the classical stupid argument "it's that way because". now although these opinions shouldnt have been made in the first place if they dont have proper support you cant discredit them unless there is a obviose flaw in them or a flaw that is made obviose by logical argument.
*end rant which was totally off topic*
I personally beleive in god for reasons i dont want to go into at the moment, so i do beleive in heaven and hell so I cetainly about death and life. but i cant disprove atheism so again i can see the point of view of people such as Euro. one quick note for those who are atheist out there, dont miss judge those who are religiose with those who are evangelical (i.e. are always trying to convert you to their religion). one of the sad things about those who are evangelical is that they are most often the ones least fit to do the job of convincing others. all the smart ones relize that it cant easily be done but they at least could put up a good argument, while all those who are ost often trying to convert others are to dumb to relize this point. of coure there are some exceptions but i dont think euro meet one of those.
also, kow what do u mean your not afraid of death it's self but of dying?