QUOTE(Shapechanger @ Sep 14 2005, 06:32 PM)
Take into note:
WWII - Soldiers were naturally kind to each other, partied with each other during treaties, didn't kill the wounded, didn't shoot civilians.
Now - Treaty? Great time for a car bombing or artillery strike, eh? Wounded? *bam* Sure he ain't dead? Civilian? No, no, that's an Iraq. They're all terrorists, remember?
Difference? No United Nations back in WWII
God I hate America
[right][snapback]314241[/snapback][/right]
Now: Our soldiers nice to terrorists, then "Allah Akbar!" BLAM BOOM BLAM, some dead American soldiers.....and your really smart to beleive Iraqis are all terrorists there...
"Shooting wounded" You must be talking about that video of the marines rushing into a building in Iraq and then the edited version of them shooting bodies laying on the ground. Well thank the ACTUAL terrorists for our policy, they tend to booby trap their wounded and also what you don't see in the video and even the camera man admits it is that the soldiers told the wounded not to move, but one did anyway and blam, thats the end of him....
QUOTE(DT_Battlekruser @ Sep 14 2005, 09:45 PM)
The U.N. was useful until America said "Screw the UN! We do what we want!"
[right][snapback]314359[/snapback][/right]
U.N. was useful when it was proactive, now its corrupt and nothing gets done in there.
UN was a good idea, but its too conjusted at the moment to be effective.