http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1724541,00.htmlhttp://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1724541,00.htmlI don't see Iraq or Afghanistan or support for Israel or support for the Royal House of Saud or support of Hosni Mubarak or support of the Hussein Family of Jordan or support of the rulers of the other Gulf States being mentioned anywhere in there save when Bakri is propagandizing the new recruits. Nor is there any mention of anti-Islam bias or discriminatory government policies, or any of the other typical progressive talking points about terrorism and why the West really is to blame. They do get in their quota of anti-semitism, though. Gotta love the consistency.
Instead we find that the ideological motivations of Islamist terrorists are easily recognizable as the same that drove Hitler and Stalin: paradise on earth through worldwide rule according to the tenets of Nazism/Stalinism/Sharia/What have you.
So, in light of the Times of London's bit of investigative journalism, what do you now believe is the cause of anti-Western, primarily anti-American terrorism whose perpetrators are Muslim? The foreign policies of the West, or because they think it's their holy duty to force the rule of Islam upon the world?