Report, edit, etc...Posted by AgenT_Nick on 2005-09-29 at 18:26:11
1.
[attachmentid=14281]
2.
[attachmentid=14282]
thx
[attachmentid=14281]
2.
[attachmentid=14282]
thx
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Ninebreaker on 2005-09-29 at 18:27:59
First Picture: Nothing amazing, still good 6.5/10
Second: Too many waterfall sprites + the bridge looks weird going from
lvl 2 to lvl 1... (height wise)
Second: Too many waterfall sprites + the bridge looks weird going from
lvl 2 to lvl 1... (height wise)
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Sniper on 2005-09-29 at 18:42:31
The elevation is messed up on the second one.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by AgenT_Nick on 2005-09-29 at 20:37:35
theres a cliff across the river but u cant see it =/
Report, edit, etc...Posted by WoodenFire on 2005-09-30 at 16:28:23
First 1 is nice cliff to cliff blending, 3/10.
Second can be fixed height wise by adding cliff on the northwest part, 2/10.
Second can be fixed height wise by adding cliff on the northwest part, 2/10.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by PlayaR on 2005-09-30 at 16:32:22
QUOTE(Ninebreaker @ Sep 29 2005, 06:27 PM)
Second: Too many waterfall sprites
[right][snapback]324242[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]324242[/snapback][/right]
it only has 17....
and ill rate now
first = 4/10
2nd = 5/10
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Toothfariy on 2005-09-30 at 19:30:53
i can't make ash world terrain worth blam but i think thats nice. 
8/10
second one is ok, 6/10
8/10
second one is ok, 6/10
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DjDTM on 2005-09-30 at 23:01:10
The second one hurts my head. Its like the impossable Cube...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Ninebreaker on 2005-09-30 at 23:56:20
QUOTE
it only has 17....
And the waterfall is 2x2
thats 4 sprites per square.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Wilhelm on 2005-10-01 at 09:26:51
For one and two, there's some repetition in places, it'd be easy to fix. The second has it's share of easy to fix flaws. For starters, the elevation is completely screwed. As people have said, it goes from elevation to a low bridge. The piece that makes it "go back" is also on land, further screwing with the perspective, not to mention the fact that if there's a waterfall, it has to be taller then the next piece, but it looks like it's not taller, just further back than it. Overall, 4/10, since they're not terrible, just some rather cliche ideas. Come on people! Let's see some innovation!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kamikaze.Kow on 2005-10-01 at 12:01:37
QUOTE(Wilhelm @ Oct 1 2005, 06:26 AM)
...Come on people! Let's see some innovation!
[right][snapback]325153[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]325153[/snapback][/right]
How inspiring..
Anyway, the first one is simple, and OK. Nice job on it I say.
The second has quite a bit of problems that I won't list considering that countless others already have.
Try fixing the problems other people have said, and make the second one not so bland. I mean, it's just dirt. Maybe put some rocky terrain in there, a bit of high dirt and some other stuff?
KICK IT UP A NOTCH!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by glytchur on 2005-10-01 at 12:34:20
QUOTE
KICK IT UP A NOTCH!
BAM!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by T-MaStAA on 2005-10-01 at 13:59:12
I can tell im not a terrain expert (this type) I think there awsome.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Atreyu) on 2005-10-01 at 14:28:51
They look pretty good 7.5/10 on both gf Agent