Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> Serious Discussion -> Government Control
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Shmeeps on 2006-01-04 at 23:15:23
We all know that the government has to keeps it's people under control.

But, is there such thing as too much?

An interesting topic. And of you who have read or watched "Farenheiht 451" or "Equilibrium" will know what I mean.

For those who don't, Farenheiht 451 is a book in which the governemt stops people from reading any books, for fear that the knowledge will cause things to happen. Books found are burned, and sometimes so are the owners. A fireman (Who ironically start fires instead of putting them out) named Gui Montag (Yes, same name as the SC firebat) is moved to stop this and start reading. It goes from there.

Equilibrium is similar story, although mor emodernized. The government uses drugs to stop people from feeling. Anything found that makes them, eg. books, animals, anything, is removed and the owners incinerated. A cleric, who upholds the law, is interested after his former parter does the same, and is killed. Goes from there.

So, this is where the topic comes in. If we can feel nothing, will this stop us from war? Would it make everything peaceful, at the expense of our freedom?

And how many of you would let this happen? Would you let a completely totalitarian fascist government strip all your freedoms to protect the peace?

Would you let humanity become a crime?

Also, what is our life if stripped of it's humanity? Would it even really help? Is what we feel our ultimate destruction?

Your thoughts.



PS: Sorry for any mistakes in there, I'll correct them later, don't have my contacts in wink.gif
And if you haven't read or seen these films/books, you should. They're good.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2006-01-04 at 23:55:22
If a government was radically moving in the direction to stop my free will, then yes I would go Cleric on them and fark some people up.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Cloud on 2006-01-05 at 00:36:07
QUOTE(Shmeeps @ Jan 5 2006, 04:15 AM)
We all know that the government has to keeps it's people under control.

But, is there such thing as too much?

An interesting topic. And of you who have read or watched "Farenheiht 451" or "Equilibrium" will know what I mean.

For those who don't, Farenheiht 451 is a book in which the governemt stops people from reading any books, for fear that the knowledge will cause things to happen. Books found are burned, and sometimes so are the owners. A fireman (Who ironically start fires instead of putting them out) named Gui Montag (Yes, same name as the SC firebat) is moved to stop this and start reading. It goes from there.

Equilibrium is similar story, although mor emodernized. The government uses drugs to stop people from feeling. Anything found that makes them, eg. books, animals, anything, is removed and the owners incinerated. A cleric, who upholds the law, is interested after his former parter does the same, and is killed. Goes from there.

So, this is where the topic comes in. If we can feel nothing, will this stop us from war? Would it make everything peaceful, at the expense of our freedom?

And how many of you would let this happen? Would you let a completely totalitarian fascist government strip all your freedoms to protect the peace?

Would you let humanity become a crime?

Also, what is our life if stripped of it's humanity? Would it even really help? Is what we feel our ultimate destruction?

Your thoughts.
PS: Sorry for any mistakes in there, I'll correct them later, don't have my contacts in wink.gif
And if you haven't read or seen these films/books, you should. They're good.
[right][snapback]398830[/snapback][/right]


this is called dictatorship.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Sie_Sayoka on 2006-01-05 at 00:59:46
i think the power to keep information from the public is good to a certain extent.
example:

the government knows of alien existance.
the government should tell the public about other life.

the government knows of alien existance and the aliens want to kill us.
the government should not tell the public.

in scenerio one the knowledge will only provoke a small unrest.
in scenerio two the knowledge will drive many people crazy and most of the world will be in chaos.

the best way to handle with scenerio two is to find a way to fix it secretly. if this does not work then they should inform the public.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kame on 2006-01-05 at 01:21:07
el oh el. Its ammusing; believing that the government should have little [or no] place in the people's lives is a conservative thought, yet I always was under the impression that this place was liberal.

The government deserves to have very little control over anything. That statement really should answer your questions as far as I care to discuss.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by lonely_duck on 2006-01-05 at 04:43:07
It all comes down to one word, moderation, face it, everything can be done too much, or too little; in all the books that I read about this type of thing (1984, farenheight 451, WWII books...) they all were in a state of war so it couldn't truly be a peaceful life.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kashmir on 2006-01-05 at 16:58:05
1984 for teh win! George Orwell had a vision of the path this world is taking.
QUOTE
If a government was radically moving in the direction to stop my free will, then yes I would go Cleric on them and fark some people up.

You see, in 1984, people thing everything ok, think that what the government is doing is for the better cause. Hmm Denying their freedoms, which they think is going to help them be more "secure". Sounds alot like America today doesn't it? I'm not saying everything in that book is happening now, but if we keep taking this path, it can and most likely will.

These are from WorldcantWait.org, which I STRONGLY encourage each and every one of you to read through.
Also check this site, which is listed at WCW.
http://www.nion.us/NSOC/NION2wsigninfo.htm

"The Bush regime is setting out to radically remake society very quickly, in a fascist way, and for generations to come."

It is our responsibility to stop the Bush regime from carrying out this disastrous course. We believe history will judge us sharply should we fail to act decisively.

"Q: In your Call you compare Bush to Hitler, isn’t that too extreme?

A: The Bush regime has sanctioned unrestrained governmental spying on its citizens; has rounded up more than 23,000 Arabs, Muslims and South Asians from within U.S. borders; has opened secret torture prisons in countries across the world; openly practices torture; is persevering in an unjust war that the world knows was based on lies; is dangerously close to ending birth control and abortion for women (one of the first things the Nazis did); has created a separate legal category for gays through the banning of gay marriage; is undermining science; has let a major city rot in its own ruins and abandoned hundreds of thousands of its displaced mainly black population; has concentrated unrestrained power in the executive branch; has constructed a political apparatus and redrawn electoral districts and put in place suspect voting machines potentially creating a situation where, like the PRI of Mexico, it can win elections for decades, and shows no signs of relenting despite massive public disapproval.

IF ALL OF THIS ISN’T ENOUGH TO MAKE YOU “THINK OF FASCISTS,” then, you have learned to accept too much.

Yes, Bush is different from Hitler. Fascism here will not have a weird mustache and brownshirts. The comedian George Carlin said it will come in Nike sneakers and smiley faces. Or, we’d add, perhaps cowboy boots, blue jeans and a smirk.

Sunsara Taylor has written: “It is faulty logic to dismiss the comparison to Hitler because George Bush hasn’t yet crushed all political opposition, murdered millions in death camps, or dispatched jack-booted storm troopers in the streets. The Nazis were genocidal before they committed or even planned genocide.” ...

“It is easy to look back today, and believe that the Nazis were a unique evil without parallel. But, during their rise, it was controversial and criminally uncommon for people to correctly identify the direction and the logic of society as it became dominated by the Nazis, a once-fringe group of extremists. Even after the first nation-wide action where Nazi brownshirts prevented people from shopping in Jewish businesses, it was still the case that, in the words of one observer, “the majority of the people on the street were inclined to treat the matter as more or less of a joke.”

“And, despite the increasing dominance of the Nazis over society and their long established history of fierce anti-communism and anti-Semitism, when the escalation of terror would taper off for a little while, people would tell themselves the story that the worst was over. For instance, while 60,000 Jews left Germany during 1933 and 1934, by mid-1935 10,000 of them returned. All the way to the gates of the death camps, people took false comfort in the assumption that such things ‘could never happen here.’

“While the Nazis certainly didn’t harbor any moral qualms with it, they did not actually start out with a plan for mass extermination of millions of Jews. Their first years of terror were aimed at annihilating the communists and other political dissidents and forcing Jews out of the country. It was not until 1941, eight years after Hitler became Chancellor and entered WWII that he began to turn concentration camps into death-camps which killed millions. Still, the logic and moral justification for such a ‘Final Solution’ was discernable even in the early days.” (end excerpt, full text).

Think about this. During Hitler’s rise, Germany was a defeated power, severely constrained by the terms of the first World War. Today, the U.S. is the most powerful military force in the world. Nobel laureate Harold Pinter wrote, "The Bush Administration is the most dangerous force that has ever existed. It is more dangerous than Nazi Germany because of the range and depth of its activities and intentions worldwide. I give my full support to the Call to Drive out the Bush Regime."

No one is claiming that Bush and Hitler are exactly the same. We are saying that it would be criminal to sit back and just hope this all goes away on its own. We still have time, if we seize it now and act with great urgency to do what the German people of the 1930’s failed to do – that is, drive out this regime before it takes its greatest toll. "
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2006-01-05 at 18:28:47
QUOTE(Euro @ Jan 5 2006, 01:58 PM)
1984 for teh win! George Orwell had a vision of the path this world is taking.

You see, in 1984, people thing everything ok, think that what the government is doing is for the better cause. Hmm Denying their freedoms, which they think is going to help them be more "secure". Sounds alot like America today doesn't it? I'm not saying everything in that book is happening now, but if we keep taking this path, it can and most likely will.

These are from WorldcantWait.org, which I STRONGLY encourage each and every one of you to read through.
Also check this site, which is listed at WCW.
http://www.nion.us/NSOC/NION2wsigninfo.htm

"The Bush regime is setting out to radically remake society very quickly, in a fascist way, and for generations to come."

It is our responsibility to stop the Bush regime from carrying out this disastrous course. We believe history will judge us sharply should we fail to act decisively.

"Q: In your Call you compare Bush to Hitler, isn’t that too extreme?

A: The Bush regime has sanctioned unrestrained governmental spying on its citizens; has rounded up more than 23,000 Arabs, Muslims and South Asians from within U.S. borders; has opened secret torture prisons in countries across the world; openly practices torture; is persevering in an unjust war that the world knows was based on lies; is dangerously close to ending birth control and abortion for women (one of the first things the Nazis did); has created a separate legal category for gays through the banning of gay marriage; is undermining science; has let a major city rot in its own ruins and abandoned hundreds of thousands of its displaced mainly black population; has concentrated unrestrained power in the executive branch; has constructed a political apparatus and redrawn electoral districts and put in place suspect voting machines potentially creating a situation where, like the PRI of Mexico, it can win elections for decades, and shows no signs of relenting despite massive public disapproval.

IF ALL OF THIS ISN’T ENOUGH TO MAKE YOU “THINK OF FASCISTS,” then, you have learned to accept too much.

Yes, Bush is different from Hitler. Fascism here will not have a weird mustache and brownshirts. The comedian George Carlin said it will come in Nike sneakers and smiley faces. Or, we’d add, perhaps cowboy boots, blue jeans and a smirk.

Sunsara Taylor has written: “It is faulty logic to dismiss the comparison to Hitler because George Bush hasn’t yet crushed all political opposition, murdered millions in death camps, or dispatched jack-booted storm troopers in the streets. The Nazis were genocidal before they committed or even planned genocide.” ...

“It is easy to look back today, and believe that the Nazis were a unique evil without parallel. But, during their rise, it was controversial and criminally uncommon for people to correctly identify the direction and the logic of society as it became dominated by the Nazis, a once-fringe group of extremists. Even after the first nation-wide action where Nazi brownshirts prevented people from shopping in Jewish businesses, it was still the case that, in the words of one observer, “the majority of the people on the street were inclined to treat the matter as more or less of a joke.”

“And, despite the increasing dominance of the Nazis over society and their long established history of fierce anti-communism and anti-Semitism, when the escalation of terror would taper off for a little while, people would tell themselves the story that the worst was over. For instance, while 60,000 Jews left Germany during 1933 and 1934, by mid-1935 10,000 of them returned. All the way to the gates of the death camps, people took false comfort in the assumption that such things ‘could never happen here.’

“While the Nazis certainly didn’t harbor any moral qualms with it, they did not actually start out with a plan for mass extermination of millions of Jews. Their first years of terror were aimed at annihilating the communists and other political dissidents and forcing Jews out of the country. It was not until 1941, eight years after Hitler became Chancellor and entered WWII that he began to turn concentration camps into death-camps which killed millions. Still, the logic and moral justification for such a ‘Final Solution’ was discernable even in the early days.” (end excerpt, full text).

Think about this. During Hitler’s rise, Germany was a defeated power, severely constrained by the terms of the first World War. Today, the U.S. is the most powerful military force in the world. Nobel laureate Harold Pinter wrote, "The Bush Administration is the most dangerous force that has ever existed. It is more dangerous than Nazi Germany because of the range and depth of its activities and intentions worldwide. I give my full support to the Call to Drive out the Bush Regime."

No one is claiming that Bush and Hitler are exactly the same. We are saying that it would be criminal to sit back and just hope this all goes away on its own. We still have time, if we seize it now and act with great urgency to do what the German people of the 1930’s failed to do – that is, drive out this regime before it takes its greatest toll. "

[right][snapback]399200[/snapback][/right]


YES! Take up arms!! Call in the liberal minute men! Revolt against this government who has stripped us of all our freedoms and freewill. We must stop this evil empire of hate! Onward with the divisions!

Euro, you command the 1st Airborne, you have the east coast, take Washington!
Kellimus, you command the Navy in the Pacific, Blockade the government's supplies!
We need one more general though to command the 1st infantry for middle america...

Come brothers, theres no time to wait, gather together and meet in San Fransico in 3 months!


Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kashmir on 2006-01-05 at 18:31:20
Roger that, btw I control the 82nd, get it right!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2006-01-05 at 18:32:20
Well since its a new liberal army, I was thinking we should start out with 1s. You could be the 101st?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kashmir on 2006-01-05 at 19:59:28
Sure why not smile.gif But lets stay on topic as to not get this thread closed too. I enjoy debating/arguing with you smile.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Rantent on 2006-01-05 at 20:29:34
People are normally happy.
When the government gives people a right, the people are happier.
When the government take away a right, the people become less happy then if they never had the right.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kame on 2006-01-05 at 20:31:10
QUOTE(Rantent @ Jan 5 2006, 06:29 PM)

People are normally happy.
When the government gives people a right, the people are happier.
When the government take away a right, the people become less happy then if they never had the right.
[right][snapback]399462[/snapback][/right]

From one perspective, yes. But I bet people are happier knowing that there won't be a bomb on their airplane because of compulsory luggage checks.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kashmir on 2006-01-05 at 20:34:47
QUOTE
From one perspective, yes. But I bet people are happier knowing that there won't be a bomb on their airplane because of compulsory luggage checks.
Yes bu no one is fighting over luggage checks.. let hem check... What I'm taking about (the government) is the NSA doing surveillence on americans, without warrents!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2006-01-05 at 20:41:23
Warrants---shmorrants tongue.gif

All it is, is a peice of crapola from trees happy.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kashmir on 2006-01-05 at 21:53:39
terrorists ---- smerawists

Who cares if they kill people, they'll die one day anway.... ;D
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kame on 2006-01-06 at 01:13:54
QUOTE(Euro @ Jan 5 2006, 06:34 PM)
Yes bu no one is fighting over luggage checks.. let hem check... What I'm taking about (the government) is the NSA doing surveillence on americans, without warrents!
[right][snapback]399472[/snapback][/right]

Well then, there is an exception to every rule, isn't there? I have nothing to worry about, I'm not doing anything wrong. And if someone is wrongly accused, the people won't stand for it. And if they do stand for it...then its their own damn fault the government is getting away with it.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kashmir on 2006-01-06 at 18:46:34
QUOTE
Well then, there is an exception to every rule, isn't there? I have nothing to worry about, I'm not doing anything wrong. And if someone is wrongly accused, the people won't stand for it. And if they do stand for it...then its their own damn fault the government is getting away with it.
The people have stood for it. What are they going to do? Half of them are brainwashed into thinking anything bush does is for the good of the people, and a quarter of the people don't like it but won't do anything about it, and the last quarter of ppl want it to stop and protest.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2006-01-06 at 21:24:09
I would say the 'people' means more then just a couple hundred... Thats a tiny percent of a country.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Loser_Musician on 2006-01-06 at 21:28:22
QUOTE(S.T.A.R.S-Chris @ Jan 4 2006, 11:55 PM)
If a government was radically moving in the direction to stop my free will, then yes I would go Cleric on them and fark some people up.
[right][snapback]398867[/snapback][/right]


That about sums it up for me.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kashmir on 2006-01-06 at 21:46:45
but you see, its not going to move super fast as to alert everyone. It will discreetly move into a facist and unfree society where everyone thinks alike that their government is working for them, and in reality they are mindless puppets. You, my friend, would not rise up as you would be alone, once ww2 started and the gestapo were about, any kind of revolt in nazi germany would of been crushed. Thats why people say we must act now before it even gets to that point.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Loser_Musician on 2006-01-07 at 20:32:18
Exactly. That's why you act sooner. Shoot em while they're young. If adult hood = Nazi, you shoot em while they're a teenager. Either it be with a bullet, or with the law.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kashmir on 2006-01-08 at 01:03:14
Lately you haven't come up with a good argument and sound like your always joking. Whats up alpha?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by the on 2006-01-08 at 01:12:49
QUOTE(Euro @ Jan 6 2006, 08:46 PM)
but you see, its not going to move super fast as to alert everyone. It will discreetly move into a facist and unfree society where everyone thinks alike that their government is working for them, and in reality they are mindless puppets. You, my friend, would not rise up as you would be alone, once ww2 started and the gestapo were about, any kind of revolt in nazi germany would of been crushed. Thats why people say we must act now before it even gets to that point.
[right][snapback]400430[/snapback][/right]


i see that you hate the government listenning to what you say

how do you feel about the government taking your money? or forcing you not to buy things that are harmless to others?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2006-01-08 at 03:26:09
Wow. How observant you are! *Claps*

I dislike the government taxing me. Is it my fault they are to stupid to help their own financial problems? No. So why take my money to help with their own problems when they are supposed to be on top of things??

And you need to quit assuming.

Edit: By the way. Why is it, that every post you have on here, lacks a concrete arguement? What are you, 12? (That personal attack against me was uncalled for: http://www.staredit.net/index.php?showtopi...ndpost&p=401626. Moderators have been informed.)
Next Page (1)