Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2006-01-06 at 23:41:43
Opinion Poll Rules
1. Statements of opinion must be thorough and thought out. Blatant exclamations of "IDIOT!!", for example, will not be tolerated.
2. No flaming people while stating your opinion.
3. A new opinion poll will be posted in less that pi weeks.
Last Week: A moderate majority confirmed there was a difference between love and lust..
This Week: Time to reassess. Same question as #1.
My Response: No. Still am disgusted, and nothing had happened to change that.
List of all previous polls
1.Do you approve of the way President Bush is doing his job?
2.Is Communism a good idea?
3.References to God should be removed (i.e. "under God" in the pledge and "In God We Trust" on money)
4.Is I. Lewis ("Scooter") Libby Guilty?
5.What are your thoughts over the current evidence of corruption in the government?
6.Are you disturbed by in overwhelming Mexican/Hispanic influence on the US?
7.Are love and lust essentially the same thing, varying in intensity?
1. Statements of opinion must be thorough and thought out. Blatant exclamations of "IDIOT!!", for example, will not be tolerated.
2. No flaming people while stating your opinion.
3. A new opinion poll will be posted in less that pi weeks.
Last Week: A moderate majority confirmed there was a difference between love and lust..
This Week: Time to reassess. Same question as #1.
My Response: No. Still am disgusted, and nothing had happened to change that.
List of all previous polls
1.Do you approve of the way President Bush is doing his job?
2.Is Communism a good idea?
3.References to God should be removed (i.e. "under God" in the pledge and "In God We Trust" on money)
4.Is I. Lewis ("Scooter") Libby Guilty?
5.What are your thoughts over the current evidence of corruption in the government?
6.Are you disturbed by in overwhelming Mexican/Hispanic influence on the US?
7.Are love and lust essentially the same thing, varying in intensity?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Sie_Sayoka on 2006-01-07 at 00:29:10
yeah almost everything he has done does not benefit this country. he abuses his power and no one stops him. i think he should of been impeached a long time ago
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kashmir on 2006-01-07 at 05:38:05
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Infested-Jerk on 2006-01-07 at 10:23:41
(Replace Stupid with "Him")Bush is a
moron who couldn't tell a woman's from a donkey's .Report, edit, etc...Posted by Doodan on 2006-01-07 at 11:24:48
I vote no.
It's been obvious since the beginning that his motives are not in the best interest of the people, but in the best interest of himself and his financial supporters (each of the last two elections cost each candidate well over 100 million dollars). But I am happy to see that he's losing footing on his policies and today the people looking into his spying program say the admistrations's arguments were "unpersuasive" and that the act itself is most likely illegal. He hasn't had that damn cocky smirk lately and that makes me happy. He's a sore winner and a sore loser. Nature has a way of toppling the corrupt.
ADDITION:
I just thought of my stance in the theory that Bush doesn't actually run anything. He's a puppet. That's why the people and standards that he claims to represent are of conflicting interests, and his "agenda" is just a shopping list that was compiled by his supporters.
It's been obvious since the beginning that his motives are not in the best interest of the people, but in the best interest of himself and his financial supporters (each of the last two elections cost each candidate well over 100 million dollars). But I am happy to see that he's losing footing on his policies and today the people looking into his spying program say the admistrations's arguments were "unpersuasive" and that the act itself is most likely illegal. He hasn't had that damn cocky smirk lately and that makes me happy. He's a sore winner and a sore loser. Nature has a way of toppling the corrupt.
ADDITION:
I just thought of my stance in the theory that Bush doesn't actually run anything. He's a puppet. That's why the people and standards that he claims to represent are of conflicting interests, and his "agenda" is just a shopping list that was compiled by his supporters.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by dumbducky on 2006-01-07 at 18:13:34
QUOTE
this farker admits to spying on the american public
First off, he is spying on terrorists, not the american public. Also, the Italians caught 3 terrorists planning to bomb America to an extent worse than 9/11 using wire taps I will go and try to find the article.
QUOTE
going to war based on lies
Do you really think that Saddam Hussein would have never tried to build WMD if left ruler of Iraq?
QUOTE
under his leadership we are torturing men who cannot defend themselves because they are tied down
Wtf are you talking about?
Any way, would you like to see Kerry in office? I hope not.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Sie_Sayoka on 2006-01-07 at 18:17:20
hes talking about the afgan prisoners that the soldiers have been abusing.
what exactly is so bad about kerry? we have not seen him in office so we dont know how he would lead.
what exactly is so bad about kerry? we have not seen him in office so we dont know how he would lead.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by dumbducky on 2006-01-07 at 18:27:25
What is so bad about kerry?
He can't make his mind on anything.
Even his squad mates from Vietnam call him a liar.
BTW i found the the article
click here for it.
He can't make his mind on anything.
Even his squad mates from Vietnam call him a liar.
BTW i found the the article
click here for it.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2006-01-07 at 19:43:58
QUOTE
First off, he is spying on terrorists
No, he is not. He authorized the NSA to tap any international calls to any country made by an American citizen. If I made a business call to Tokyo, or a personal call to Seoul, it could be tapped and I would not be told.
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/17/bush.nsa/
QUOTE
Any way, would you like to see Kerry in office? I hope not.
Yes, I would. Kerry is a much more sensible person than Bush.
QUOTE
Even his squad mates from Vietnam call him a liar.
This is also not true. The "Swiftboat Veterans for Truth" were not affiliated or in the same boat as Kerry, and had no way of knowing the truth. All Kerry does is change his mind if new evidence comes to light, something Bush seems incapable of doing.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2006-01-07 at 19:51:22
Torturing prisoners? haha
You mean we aren't letting them sleep becuase they won't tell us information. I bet though terrorists get more sleep then I do...
You mean they are in hot contianers outfitted to be cells, which would be a vacation for them away from the extreme heats they are use to.
You mean we play loud pop music in their cells day and night, which I will agree to be torture cause I hate pop music.
Techniqually we could kill them if we wanted to. They don't where uniforms, they don't represent any country and they fight with no banner...
I say execute the lot......
You mean we aren't letting them sleep becuase they won't tell us information. I bet though terrorists get more sleep then I do...
You mean they are in hot contianers outfitted to be cells, which would be a vacation for them away from the extreme heats they are use to.
You mean we play loud pop music in their cells day and night, which I will agree to be torture cause I hate pop music.
Techniqually we could kill them if we wanted to. They don't where uniforms, they don't represent any country and they fight with no banner...
I say execute the lot......
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Sie_Sayoka on 2006-01-07 at 22:11:22
they are being tortured.
havent you seen them being physically and sexually abused?
havent you seen them being physically and sexually abused?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Cloud on 2006-01-08 at 00:12:00
QUOTE(Doodan @ Jan 7 2006, 04:24 PM)
I vote no.
It's been obvious since the beginning that his motives are not in the best interest of the people, but in the best interest of himself and his financial supporters (each of the last two elections cost each candidate well over 100 million dollars). But I am happy to see that he's losing footing on his policies and today the people looking into his spying program say the admistrations's arguments were "unpersuasive" and that the act itself is most likely illegal. He hasn't had that damn cocky smirk lately and that makes me happy. He's a sore winner and a sore loser. Nature has a way of toppling the corrupt.
ADDITION:
I just thought of my stance in the theory that Bush doesn't actually run anything. He's a puppet. That's why the people and standards that he claims to represent are of conflicting interests, and his "agenda" is just a shopping list that was compiled by his supporters.
[right][snapback]400673[/snapback][/right]
It's been obvious since the beginning that his motives are not in the best interest of the people, but in the best interest of himself and his financial supporters (each of the last two elections cost each candidate well over 100 million dollars). But I am happy to see that he's losing footing on his policies and today the people looking into his spying program say the admistrations's arguments were "unpersuasive" and that the act itself is most likely illegal. He hasn't had that damn cocky smirk lately and that makes me happy. He's a sore winner and a sore loser. Nature has a way of toppling the corrupt.
ADDITION:
I just thought of my stance in the theory that Bush doesn't actually run anything. He's a puppet. That's why the people and standards that he claims to represent are of conflicting interests, and his "agenda" is just a shopping list that was compiled by his supporters.
[right][snapback]400673[/snapback][/right]
what he said.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kashmir on 2006-01-08 at 01:20:51
QUOTE
Torturing prisoners? haha
You mean we aren't letting them sleep becuase they won't tell us information. I bet though terrorists get more sleep then I do... disgust.gif
You mean they are in hot contianers outfitted to be cells, which would be a vacation for them away from the extreme heats they are use to.
You mean we play loud pop music in their cells day and night, which I will agree to be torture cause I hate pop music.
Techniqually we could kill them if we wanted to. They don't where uniforms, they don't represent any country and they fight with no banner...
I say execute the lot......
You mean we aren't letting them sleep becuase they won't tell us information. I bet though terrorists get more sleep then I do... disgust.gif
You mean they are in hot contianers outfitted to be cells, which would be a vacation for them away from the extreme heats they are use to.
You mean we play loud pop music in their cells day and night, which I will agree to be torture cause I hate pop music.
Techniqually we could kill them if we wanted to. They don't where uniforms, they don't represent any country and they fight with no banner...
I say execute the lot......
Uh no, humiliation is a form of torture... thought you kept up on the news chris. Torturing them based on their phobias, going against their religion (showing them naked women) I mean ya i would like that but to them its a sin.
Also dumbdonkey, I'm glad you picked your name based on your intelligence.
Saddam would probably not go for them in the next 10 years. He couldn't afford them, he was so in debt trying to just support his military, he owed russia like a couple million and other countries too. Even an inside source said their nuclear program died a decade ago. Plus why should we police the world of nuclear weapons... when we have over 2000 in our arsenal!
BTW, as DTBK said, he IS spying on americans. He spies on country-country calls of american citizens.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by the on 2006-01-08 at 01:28:43
if humiliaation counts as torture, then the word "torture" loses it's meaning
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2006-01-08 at 01:38:08
QUOTE(Euro @ Infested-Jerk, Doodan)
(Replace Stupid with "Him")Bush is a
moron who couldn't tell a woman's from a donkey's .I vote no.
It's been obvious since the beginning that his motives are not in the best interest of the people, but in the best interest of himself and his financial supporters (each of the last two elections cost each candidate well over 100 million dollars). But I am happy to see that he's losing footing on his policies and today the people looking into his spying program say the admistrations's arguments were "unpersuasive" and that the act itself is most likely illegal. He hasn't had that damn cocky smirk lately and that makes me happy. He's a sore winner and a sore loser. Nature has a way of toppling the corrupt.
ADDITION:
I just thought of my stance in the theory that Bush doesn't actually run anything. He's a puppet. That's why the people and standards that he claims to represent are of conflicting interests, and his "agenda" is just a shopping list that was compiled by his supporters.
[right][snapback]400673[/snapback][/right]
That pretty much sums up what I believe.
To Doodan: He is the puppet of the NWO (New World Order), the people trying to form the world into one dictatorship.
QUOTE(dumbducky @ Jan 7 2006, 04:13 PM)
First off, he is spying on terrorists, not the american public. Also, the Italians caught 3 terrorists planning to bomb America to an extent worse than 9/11 using wire taps I will go and try to find the article.
Do you really think that Saddam Hussein would have never tried to build WMD if left ruler of Iraq?
Wtf are you talking about?
Any way, would you like to see Kerry in office? I hope not.
[right][snapback]401048[/snapback][/right]
Do you really think that Saddam Hussein would have never tried to build WMD if left ruler of Iraq?
Wtf are you talking about?
Any way, would you like to see Kerry in office? I hope not.
[right][snapback]401048[/snapback][/right]
Um.. Why would the United States Government, need to know every single book you check out from the library, eh? How about your local police department getting bored one day, and decides to tap into your house and listen to you talking to your girlfriend about going and doing things for the first time, and know EXACTLY where you're going to do it, then they arrest you eh?
Exactly. Just be quiet, greyie.
Uh.. No. He isn't that stupid like Bush is.
Actually, I WOULD like to see Kerry in office. It's a lot better than an arrogent fark like Bush.
QUOTE(S.T.A.R.S-Chris @ Jan 7 2006, 05:51 PM)
Torturing prisoners? haha
You mean we aren't letting them sleep becuase they won't tell us information. I bet though terrorists get more sleep then I do...
You mean they are in hot contianers outfitted to be cells, which would be a vacation for them away from the extreme heats they are use to.
You mean we play loud pop music in their cells day and night, which I will agree to be torture cause I hate pop music.
Techniqually we could kill them if we wanted to. They don't where uniforms, they don't represent any country and they fight with no banner...
I say execute the lot......
[right][snapback]401144[/snapback][/right]
You mean we aren't letting them sleep becuase they won't tell us information. I bet though terrorists get more sleep then I do...
You mean they are in hot contianers outfitted to be cells, which would be a vacation for them away from the extreme heats they are use to.
You mean we play loud pop music in their cells day and night, which I will agree to be torture cause I hate pop music.
Techniqually we could kill them if we wanted to. They don't where uniforms, they don't represent any country and they fight with no banner...
I say execute the lot......
[right][snapback]401144[/snapback][/right]
I laugh at your first remark. Remember the picture of a certain Prv. holding a hose, and doing the thumbs up with a cig in her mouth, and a naken POW? Remember how she got sent to trial, too?
And the rest of your post, is just random, bland, useless spam.
If we excecute them, that = a breach in the Geneva Treaties (Terrorists don't applie to them, so don't use the argument, "They don't follow it" because we are a world super-power. We should follow the rules and set examples. Whoopsie, to late!)
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Doodan on 2006-01-08 at 02:28:39
I'll tell you what the real danger of the wiretapping is:
Some of you may know this, some may not, but during the Cold War, the government kept surveillance over the country. Often times, if the leader of an interest group that had conflicting views with the current administration began to gain some power, evidence that they were communists would conveniently surface and they would lose everything in the turmoil of trying to clear their names.
The same thing could happen now (and probably already has). If someone starts to become a threat to the administration, then I'm sure evidence of being linked to terrorists might conveniently surface and they would lose everything.
Bush has maintained that the spying is a "wartime privilege," but he has also said that the war on terror is a "neverending war." You see where I'm going here?
Some of you may know this, some may not, but during the Cold War, the government kept surveillance over the country. Often times, if the leader of an interest group that had conflicting views with the current administration began to gain some power, evidence that they were communists would conveniently surface and they would lose everything in the turmoil of trying to clear their names.
The same thing could happen now (and probably already has). If someone starts to become a threat to the administration, then I'm sure evidence of being linked to terrorists might conveniently surface and they would lose everything.
Bush has maintained that the spying is a "wartime privilege," but he has also said that the war on terror is a "neverending war." You see where I'm going here?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2006-01-08 at 04:46:44
QUOTE
The same thing could happen now (and probably already has). If someone starts to become a threat to the administration, then I'm sure evidence of being linked to terrorists might conveniently surface and they would lose everything.
Been watching Good Night and Good Luck?
Seriously though, this is a major concern. The Plame family comes to mind. He speaks out about the war and conveniently it leaks out his wife is in the CIA.
Also, there is the ridiculousness of some of the terrorist measures. A woman's infant child ended up on a terrorist watch list and she was held up because they had to make sure 5-month-old baby wasn't going to hijack the plane.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kashmir on 2006-01-08 at 05:24:23
hey you never know! if the mother did steriods during pregnancy... he may pack a punch....
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Freedawk on 2006-01-08 at 08:36:24
Suprised that no one voted for no comment.
No because he is always late for a disaster. He is more of a laid back guy who depends on others instead of doing all the work for himself.
No because he is always late for a disaster. He is more of a laid back guy who depends on others instead of doing all the work for himself.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2006-01-08 at 11:16:25
No... infact, my opinion of him has only gotten worse since the first poll.
Agreed.
QUOTE
I just thought of my stance in the theory that Bush doesn't actually run anything. He's a puppet. That's why the people and standards that he claims to represent are of conflicting interests, and his "agenda" is just a shopping list that was compiled by his supporters.
Agreed.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Cloud on 2006-01-08 at 16:29:09
actually dont we have like 2 or 3 other polls about Bush? if im right which im pretty sure i am, this is pretty pointless and adding up to more flamming 
eather that or im just a plain straight up idoit.
eather that or im just a plain straight up idoit.Report, edit, etc...Posted by Sie_Sayoka on 2006-01-08 at 18:22:01
its a combination of the 2. lol jk dude yeah if anything our opinions about bush would of worsend
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kashmir on 2006-01-08 at 20:41:08
QUOTE
f humiliaation counts as torture, then the word "torture" loses it's meaning
Actually no it doesn't, it retains its meaning because humiliation IS a form of torture. Emotional torture is still torture. Torture does not just mean physical. Figured they taught that in 6th grade, you probably haven't gotten there yet.Report, edit, etc...Posted by dumbducky on 2006-01-09 at 16:04:42
So a few soldiers himiliate some prisoners and suddenly all of the American troops stationed at prisons are torturing their prisoners?
That happened two years ago(or was it 3?) and those responsible were punished.
So don't say we torture our prisoners.
That happened two years ago(or was it 3?) and those responsible were punished.
So don't say we torture our prisoners.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Cloud on 2006-01-09 at 18:51:08
QUOTE(Euro @ Jan 9 2006, 01:41 AM)
Actually no it doesn't, it retains its meaning because humiliation IS a form of torture. Emotional torture is still torture. Torture does not just mean physical. Figured they taught that in 6th grade, you probably haven't gotten there yet.
[right][snapback]402371[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]402371[/snapback][/right]
agreed.
QUOTE(dumbducky @ Jan 9 2006, 09:04 PM)
So a few soldiers himiliate some prisoners and suddenly all of the American troops stationed at prisons are torturing their prisoners?
That happened two years ago(or was it 3?) and those responsible were punished.
So don't say we torture our prisoners.
[right][snapback]402788[/snapback][/right]
That happened two years ago(or was it 3?) and those responsible were punished.
So don't say we torture our prisoners.
[right][snapback]402788[/snapback][/right]
No. Your taking his meaning in a very brainless way.
MA edit: Don't flame, or you will be warned. Thanks
