In my defence:
QUOTE
*Complete lack of professionalism (like 0 doodads)
Added like 30 doodads
QUOTE
*Lack of color/interest
The only color i didn't use was bright pink. Lack of interest?!?! what is that supposed to mean?
QUOTE
*No buildings or points of direction
Its just landscape, so its a good thing there aren't buildings
QUOTE
*Absolutely no sign of usefullness of the terrain piece (example : Not used in a map (unused terrain))
Pretty sure it's unused terrain because I just made it. No one is going to copy it straight from the picture each time I make some terrain and make a map out of it.(btw, pieces of this might be going into my zelda oot map)
QUOTE
*Bad choices of back-cliff blending
Thats true... You got me there. lol.
QUOTE
*Multipul spacing problems
It helps to know where so I can fix it...
QUOTE
*Multipul mirrored cliff faces and tiles
lol... "fixed some mirrored tiles"
QUOTE
*Multipul repetitive cliff faces and tiles
Well, seeing as there are only like 10 different cliff face blends, all terrain has this problem.
QUOTE
*Pre-Isom layout failure
Pretty sure you just added this in to make your list longer...
QUOTE
*Lack of puddles/lakes/water features
Added a puddle... About 40% of the terrain is water... Unless if i take a screenshot of straight water, Idk if I can get much more...
Although I defend myself, that doesn't mean that some of these statments aren't true... I still need to work on mirrors and repitition, and there needs to be a little more variaty, but this shouldn't give me a 2/10... I deserve at least a 2.5/10 lol... But past that, it seems like people are trying to pull the; teacher giving a student a 'B' even when they deserve an 'A' to see if they can do better.
Oh well, thats just my take on it... maybe it is just a piece of junk...
