i don't understand it. ive' seen people commenting on the weaknesses of all 3 next gen systems. i always see graphics as one but then some people say it will have so many childish games...
This makes no sense at all. I only owned a cube last generation and 70% of my games were probably rated E and I love everything single one of them. I'm 18 and play E rated games...stop the presses!
I just want someone to tell me why people mock nintendo for having too many childish games. because i like blood and gore as much as the next guy but there doesn't has to be blood for it to be fun
Well, what rating would Mega Man X have gotten if the ESRB had been around back then? Probably K-A, which merged into E later on. Still a fun as hell game.
All I dream of is a Mario game with fountains of blood and decapitations.
Zelda games have pretty much been E, yet people have always loved them.
It's just WHO these ERSB people think can handle the content of the game. I'd rather have another score for the complexity of the game.
I mean Zelda gets Es, but the puzzles can be downright confusing. On the other hand, most FPS games with M ratings are just running into an area, blasting and moving on.
It's not the difficulty of the games. The games are rated by the amount and intensity of violence, adult language, adult content and nudity that a game has.
That's why you see really hard games rated E, which obviously can't be finished by a child and it's hard for that child to understand it and then you see M rated games which children love, because they understand it and can finish it easily. Not all games are like this, but quite a large percentage.
a bunch of PS3 fanboys have been spamming the nintendo wii board on gamefaqs claiming that have more M rated games. i find that point invalid...
do you guys agree?