Staredit Network

To all you people so interested in ways to go about banning people, stop; don't worry about it, its not important. Theres about 1,000,000 ways to do it and honestly, one is enough.

Yes, there are around 100 units you could use to attack people, you could use spells, you could use upgrades, you might be able to use chat commands now with EUDs, you could have a beacon system, you could vote, you could have player one get control, you could have it so people can only ban themselves on the honor system, hell, why not just make a map where you try to see who gets banned last, with all sorts of ways to ban people? Oh wait, cause that would be gay!

So if an admin reads this please lock the topic, subtract 8 minerals from my count, and lock other topics of the nature I just listed. It is quite a waste of time and space, and banning isn't exactly a new concept. Thank you.

That's true. I don't know why people post inefficient methods for banning. But maybe you could have put this in null, that way it wouldn't get locked.

Actually our "new" ways of expressing these concepts should not be locked. For these are actually new concepts that many people haven't used so far. So this post should be locked but not along with all the methods of banning because they are in the correct forum.

I think lil-Inferno should put all his findings into 1 thread rather than make a million threads about the same kind of action.

>Moved to Staredit related