Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> Games -> HL2/CS SOURCE vs CS/HL/CZ
Report, edit, etc...Posted by ABCDEFG on 2006-07-13 at 09:58:05
I vote Half-life 1 series with Counter-Strike and Counter-Strike Condition Zero, I prefer Condition Zero because it doesn't have no recoil like Source does but source is more realistic compared to all the other stuff. Condition Zero is almost Hack-Free meaning there are a very low percent of hackers compared to all the other games. Counter-Strike however is the probably where most people hack at. Half-Life2 I vote more than Half-life1 for being more realistic and better quality.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Shapechanger on 2006-07-13 at 10:44:28
Counter-Strike: Source all the way!

I just really like the stuff the source engine adds. For one, better graphics, but also ragdolls, the ability to create crude barricade, much better grenade physics, etc.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Gigins on 2006-07-13 at 13:02:00
Source engine doesn't run on my trash so I vote for Half-Life, CS and CZ.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheRealCloakEnix on 2006-07-13 at 13:05:12
I vote for counterstrike 1.6-_-;
Report, edit, etc...Posted by yeow on 2006-07-13 at 16:40:34
I personally like 1.6 the best, and no Recoil makes it to easy.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Caboose on 2006-07-13 at 18:19:54
Only pros for Source is the graphics, go CS 1.6!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Felagund on 2006-07-13 at 21:50:41
There's enough recoil on Source. It's more realistic that way - you know, with the insanely better physics (as Source is primarily a physics engine over a graphics engine). Source has decent anti-hacker support, but the best solution is an admin, of course. And of course, it's prettier. I've had no trouble with either Source or 1.6, and I play Source because it's more fun (and highest graphics still give new games a run for their money). Also, Half-Life 2 is better (amazingly) than the original, and Day of Defeat Source (you forgot to mention that!) looks much nicer too, though I've not played it.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Valug on 2006-07-13 at 22:28:27
[sub]I'll vouch for Day of Defeat Source ownage.[/sub]
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheRealCloakEnix on 2006-07-14 at 01:13:41
QUOTE(Valug @ Jul 13 2006, 08:28 PM)
[sub]I'll vouch for Day of Defeat Source ownage.[/sub]
[right][snapback]523423[/snapback][/right]


Eh everyone looks the same in DOD lol
Report, edit, etc...Posted by yeow on 2006-07-14 at 03:29:21
I hope DoD:Source has good graphics becuase I have regular DoD and when I was holding like a kinfe.. his hand looked like a foot lol.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mr.Camo on 2006-07-14 at 13:27:38
I play Day of Defeat: Source more than any other game right now, but I love CS: S and DoD: S the most, so I'll go with HL2/All source
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathawk on 2006-07-14 at 14:18:24
Hrm... bad graphics or good graphics.

I pick good.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Revelade on 2006-07-14 at 17:05:13
Hmm, cheap game I can get dozens of mods, like TFC, NS, HI, ESF and such with,

or

upgrading my comp = buying more ram, better video card

and buying a pricey game with less mods

I go for teh value. happy.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by IDontChat on 2006-07-15 at 01:04:19
Source for the win. You've got graphics, you've got physics, you've got the ability to laugh at people who have puny computer (I can smell the problems coming from this, too). And if it's more newb friendly, then there's less undeserved free-kills. XD
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Caboose on 2006-07-15 at 16:33:28
Source actually has more hackers now than 1.6... Most people on top of pubs are either ex1.6 players or hackers(People with a 7 digit steam id or more are most likely hackers). I have friends in a hacking clan called myg0t and they have moved from making 1.6 hacks to making undetectable hacks in Source.

Source should be still in it's beta stage btw... I do enjoy playing Source to make pub n00bs feel bad and completely destroy their clan server.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Cnl.Fatso on 2006-07-15 at 19:35:51
I thoroughly enjoy both subsets. I loved CS 1.6 but I don't have it. Source is all I have, so that's what I play.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by dumbducky on 2006-07-15 at 22:11:54
QUOTE(Valug @ Jul 13 2006, 10:28 PM)
[sub]I'll vouch for Day of Defeat Source ownage.[/sub]
[right][snapback]523423[/snapback][/right]





QUOTE(TheRealCloakEnix @ Jul 14 2006, 01:13 AM)
Eh everyone looks the same in DOD lol
[right][snapback]523496[/snapback][/right]

What are you talking about? All classes look different

QUOTE(yeow @ Jul 14 2006, 03:28 AM)
I hope DoD:Source has good graphics becuase I have regular DoD and when I was holding like a kinfe.. his hand looked like a foot lol.
[right][snapback]523550[/snapback][/right]

The graphics are as good as CS:S

QUOTE(Mr.Camo @ Jul 14 2006, 01:27 PM)
I play Day of Defeat: Source more than any other game right now, but I love CS: S and DoD: S the most, so I'll go with HL2/All source
[right][snapback]523724[/snapback][/right]

My DOD:S always crashes on me after that gay "optimization" patch.

For those of you who haven't guessed, I say Source FTW!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Eskimo Bob on 2006-07-16 at 02:48:19
QUOTE(IDontChat @ Jul 14 2006, 10:03 PM)
Source for the win. You've got graphics, you've got physics, you've got the ability to laugh at people who have puny computer (I can smell the problems coming from this, too). And if it's more newb friendly, then there's less undeserved free-kills. XD
[right][snapback]524076[/snapback][/right]


Tottally agree with ya chat, But the old ones are still fun to play sometimes, But source is ownage, Thank god for physics
Report, edit, etc...Posted by LonE)Paravin on 2006-07-22 at 02:01:51
Half Life 2 is the best! ( I loved City 17 and the Citadel.. )
Next Page (1)