Report, edit, etc...Posted by JordanN_3335 on 2006-10-03 at 17:01:46
Just after reading the Halo wars thread I'm just wondering. If another starcraft game was going to be made, and it was in 3-D what category should it be moved to. It would be awsome to have a first person shooter but with all playable units like a Halo/War combat game. Downside maybe to no possible map editor. Then there could be a MMOG but then a subscription fee and countless noobs hogging up all the space. It could stay RTS but just like warcraft III some peoples computer cannot run it or be able to play online.
Just a thought and then there is the platformer.
Just a thought and then there is the platformer.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Killer_Kow(MM) on 2006-10-03 at 17:07:22
Um, a first person shooter, because if they're going to make a game they'll probably bring back ghost.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by JordanN_3335 on 2006-10-03 at 17:09:04
QUOTE(Killer_Kow(MM) @ Oct 3 2006, 05:06 PM)
Um, a first person shooter, because if they're going to make a game they'll probably bring back ghost.
[right][snapback]571330[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]571330[/snapback][/right]
No,no,no I mean like in if anything was about to happen regardless of change what would the next "So called starcraft be".
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Syphon on 2006-10-03 at 18:00:59
I want a MMORTS... 
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Centreri on 2006-10-03 at 18:03:00
RTS. Blizzard will continue the SC legacy. Or else.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Felagund on 2006-10-06 at 18:38:09
They don't care about money because they have WoW, which has to be the best money-making game of all time. Period.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by lonely_duck on 2006-10-06 at 18:51:04
In all honesty, I think an MMO of Starcraft would most likely be more profitable than WoW, Felagund.
In other news, go go adventure platform!
In other news, go go adventure platform!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Cloud on 2006-10-06 at 19:15:16
QUOTE(Centreri @ Oct 3 2006, 10:02 PM)
RTS. Blizzard will continue the SC legacy. Or else.
[right][snapback]571366[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]571366[/snapback][/right]
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Felagund on 2006-10-07 at 00:12:09
You think so? Are there even 7 million StarCraft players worldwide?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by JordanN_3335 on 2006-10-07 at 10:35:13
I hear syphons foot steps comming I better lock this topic as well.
>Topic locked
>Topic locked
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Syphon on 2006-10-07 at 11:06:02
I'm fine with 1 at a time, and this one is better.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by dumbducky on 2006-10-07 at 12:09:08
I think a 3d SC would have a cool name like project revolution.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by GTi on 2006-10-07 at 13:47:56
None of the above please...
It's going to be Text-Based face the facts my friend. =]
' but if it 'were' to be '3D' like 'people' say then I guess I could asnwer'
its going to be awsome its going to bring a whole to aspect of strategy and other stuff, everything will be close so you can't really look at the battle field, and cheat, unless you hack on the mini map! =] and how would you control your units? unless.. it was like wc3 is wc3 3D? if so then starcraft would look kool, explacially it'll bring bounds back ^_^ ' I guarentee it ' but thats just 3D
Text Based is going to conquer it all.
ADDITION:
I voted for a RTS again hopefully bekuz I love making maps that other people can play =] hopefully style will be like wc3 with the graphics but not that cartooney hopefully more detail
It's going to be Text-Based face the facts my friend. =]
' but if it 'were' to be '3D' like 'people' say then I guess I could asnwer'
its going to be awsome its going to bring a whole to aspect of strategy and other stuff, everything will be close so you can't really look at the battle field, and cheat, unless you hack on the mini map! =] and how would you control your units? unless.. it was like wc3 is wc3 3D? if so then starcraft would look kool, explacially it'll bring bounds back ^_^ ' I guarentee it ' but thats just 3D
Text Based is going to conquer it all.
ADDITION:
I voted for a RTS again hopefully bekuz I love making maps that other people can play =] hopefully style will be like wc3 with the graphics but not that cartooney hopefully more detail
Report, edit, etc...Posted by smasher25 on 2006-10-07 at 16:59:20
Definately another RTS; blizzard is cornered whether they like it or not and their only option is to make another RTS after Starcraft: ghost, putting aside their fears. I dont know what other things might happen to postpone another starcraft game or starcraft 2 for that matter, but chances are we wont be getting another SC RTS game for a long long time
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Ksrugi on 2006-10-07 at 17:28:38
QUOTE(Felagund @ Oct 6 2006, 04:37 PM)
They don't care about money because they have WoW, which has to be the best money-making game of all time. Period.
[right][snapback]572447[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]572447[/snapback][/right]
They don't care about money....?
Sure....
That's why they're in the business, to make money. It's rather idiotic to say that they're not interested in making money.
Sooner or later, they'll develop something else when people get bored of WoW or if they see a certain market they have a large influence over in trouble.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Felagund on 2006-10-07 at 18:39:45
What I meant was that money is not a concern for them.
*Edit* I just browsed for a few minutes, and I found some articles stating that WoW had generated more than $1 billion for Blizzard. It's not the best-selling game of all time, but it's the game that has made the most profit of all time.
*Edit* I just browsed for a few minutes, and I found some articles stating that WoW had generated more than $1 billion for Blizzard. It's not the best-selling game of all time, but it's the game that has made the most profit of all time.